<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Ten Commandments Lawsuits: Successfully Eroding the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2003/08/24/the-ten-commandments-lawsuits-successfully-eroding-the-free-exercise-clause-of-the-first-amendment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2003/08/24/the-ten-commandments-lawsuits-successfully-eroding-the-free-exercise-clause-of-the-first-amendment/</link>
	<description>Conservative and Libertarian Intellectual Philosophy and Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:00:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Otshine</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2003/08/24/the-ten-commandments-lawsuits-successfully-eroding-the-free-exercise-clause-of-the-first-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-9083</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Otshine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 04:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2003/the-ten-commandments-lawsuits-successfully-eroding-the-free-exercise-clause-of-the-first-amendment/#comment-9083</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think this whole affair would have caught the attention of the ACLU and Americans
United for the Separation of Church and State if it weren&#039;t for the fact that Chief Justice
Moore was &quot;exercising his First Amendment right to the  free exercise of religion&quot; at a government
job, on government property.
&quot;No one really believes that an obscure monument of the Ten Commandments represents
government establishing one religion and prohibiting others,&quot; writes Rachel Alexander. Oh no?
If the judge did exactly the same thing, but the &quot;obscure&quot; monument contained religious rules
of the Aztecs, would Rachel Alexander really find his stance acceptable? I&#039;m sure the followers of
the Persian god Mithras had some good rules too. Would Ms. Alexander honestly feel OK with her
trial opening with a few Mithraic prayers? Come on! No religion of any sort in our government is
best.

One last thing: why is it that people of a right-wing economic bent are imagined so much in our
society to be right-wing when it comes to moral values? Why is there not room for a party
representing those with right-wing moral values and what are considered left-wing economic
values? I would like to hear from others who have opinions on why economics and moral values
have been slotted into two spheres in this way. 
 
Cheers,
Mark O.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think this whole affair would have caught the attention of the ACLU and Americans<br />
United for the Separation of Church and State if it weren&#8217;t for the fact that Chief Justice<br />
Moore was &#8220;exercising his First Amendment right to the  free exercise of religion&#8221; at a government<br />
job, on government property.<br />
&#8220;No one really believes that an obscure monument of the Ten Commandments represents<br />
government establishing one religion and prohibiting others,&#8221; writes Rachel Alexander. Oh no?<br />
If the judge did exactly the same thing, but the &#8220;obscure&#8221; monument contained religious rules<br />
of the Aztecs, would Rachel Alexander really find his stance acceptable? I&#8217;m sure the followers of<br />
the Persian god Mithras had some good rules too. Would Ms. Alexander honestly feel OK with her<br />
trial opening with a few Mithraic prayers? Come on! No religion of any sort in our government is<br />
best.</p>
<p>One last thing: why is it that people of a right-wing economic bent are imagined so much in our<br />
society to be right-wing when it comes to moral values? Why is there not room for a party<br />
representing those with right-wing moral values and what are considered left-wing economic<br />
values? I would like to hear from others who have opinions on why economics and moral values<br />
have been slotted into two spheres in this way. </p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Mark O.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

