The Hillary Question
View Comments | Print This Post Print This Post |

by Isaiah Z. Sterrett | January 12th, 2004

Whenever conservatives dare mention the former president (or current senator), we are bombarded with the idea that we’re “obsessed” with them.

Continually reminding voters of President Clinton’s failed healthcare plan, depletion of the military, bungling of every foreign policy endeavor that came his way, and total degradation of the office he held — not to mention his various felonies — has worked out nicely for conservatives.  Since he left the Oval Office in early 2001 Republicans have managed to pick up both Houses of Congress, a majority of governorships, and the presidency.  As one might expect, liberals are none too pleased.

Whenever we dare to mention the former president (or current senator) we are bombarded with the idea that we’re “obsessed” with them.

Writing recently in Newsday, Ellis Henican enumerated the myriad political goings-on in which the Clintons are likely involved, including the candidacy of Wesley Clark and Al Gore’s endorsement of Howard Dean.  But anyone who believes these rumors is laughed off as one of the many “Clinton-obsessives” living in a “complete Clintonian Universe!” 

In September of last year Sean Hannity and Alan Colmes took their Fox News show on the road to Detroit.  A woman from the audience asked Colmes, the liberal co-host, how anyone could believe Hillary when she says she’s not going to run for President.  Colmes’ response:  “I don't know why you're so obsessed with the Clintons.”

Most egregiously, the New York Times’ Elisabeth Bumiller recently asked outright, “Is George W. Bush obsessed with Bill Clinton?”

Wild questions and rambling, accusatory narratives notwithstanding, conservatives are not obsessed with the Clintons.  We’re sick of them.  We wish they’d go away and never come back.  In 2000, as Mrs. Clinton was running for the senate seat she now holds, we thought we were going to be rid of her for good.  But then Rudy Giuliani was stricken with cancer.  New York Republicans responded by naively replacing him with Rick Lazio, who, as expected, lost the election.  Now, four years into her term, we can’t say a word about anything political without rehashing the various aspects of The Hillary Question.

Will she run in 2004? How about ‘08? What would Bill’s role be? Would she run as a centrist? Would she give her healthcare plan another go? Who would be V.P.? Is she really hoping for another four years of Bush?

To be sure, it’s completely understandable why the press has such a mad crush on the Clintons.  They’re fascinating.  The former president managed to smoke pot, dodge the draft, probably rape Juanita Broderick, drop his pants for Paula Jones, “comfort” Kathleen Willey, award Monica Lewinsky the first known set of Presidential Knee Pads, perjure himself, suborn perjury, obstruct justice, get impeached for it, and then avoid conviction on the basis of his use of the term “right wing.”

Hillary stayed married to the sleazeball, denounced those of us who weren’t thrilled with his behavior as part of a “conspiracy,” and participated in numerous scandals categorically ignored by the media.  Now she’s the junior senator from New York, shoe-in for the Democratic nomination whenever she wants it, and arguably the most important Democrat in the country.  She’s also the bestselling author of a book she didn’t write.

Who else has a record like that?

The only people who are obsessed with the Clintons are the Clintons.  Even Democrats are sick of them.  Susan Estrich, who ran Michael Dukakis’ doomed campaign, wrote in August 2000 that Hillary is “warmer, funnier, and plain nicer than her image suggests.”  But by mid-2003, Estrich had changed her tune.  “The Clintons suck up every bit of the available air.  Nothing is left for anyone else.”

We spent eight years listening to their incessant yammering about the scandal du jour, and we survived.  But in the Clinton years, we didn’t know we had anything better to do.  When the biggest threat facing the republic was an Al Gore speech, the fact that the president liked to play doctor with flabby interns was sort of funny.  But unfortunately, now we’ve got to worry about Islamofascists transforming passenger jets into cruise missiles.  In case they’ve not heard, there’s a war on.  And enough is enough.

Labels: Politics: General

Isaiah Z. Sterrett, a resident of Aptos, California, is a Lifetime Member of the California Junior Scholarship Federation and a Sustaining Member of the Republican National Committee.
isterrett@hotmail.com
Visit their website at:

Read more articles by Isaiah Z. Sterrett on IntellectualConservative.com

 

Responses to "The Hillary Question"

No comments yet.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.







Latest Articles

Conservative Reformation
 by Alan Roebuck
Thoughts: Young Camille Paglia’s Protest Letter, Coulter’s Invitations & Snowmen
 by Ben-Peter Terpstra
Ayers and Dohrn are Liars
 by Thomas E. Brewton
Terrorists' Rights Versus Crime Prevention
 by Rachel Alexander
Duly Noted
 by George de Poor Handlery
Reversal of Fortune
 by Bernie Reeves
What Happened and What’s Next?
 by Jan Collmer
The Plain Truth about Glorious Carbon Dioxide
 by Alan Caruba
Healthy Wisconsin is a Destructive Health Care Proposal
 by Aaron Rodriguez



Book Reviews



Features







         Top 25