On Being 65
View Comments | Print This Post Print This Post |

by Burt Prelutsky | January 10th, 2006

When I’m asked if there’s anything good about getting older, the first thing that comes to mind is, “It’s better than the alternative.”

Somebody once asked me how old I’d think I was if I didn’t know my actual age. At the time I was in my mid-50s, and I believe I said I’d think I was about 35. It is now 10 years later and, if I were asked the same question, I’d come up with pretty much the same answer. Most days, at any rate.

I guess because I’ve been blessed with reasonably good health and am still able to play tennis, I don’t really feel my age, unless, of course, there’s a mirror in the neighborhood or it’s the day of the month that my Social Security check arrives.

I’ve even managed to hang onto all my own teeth, which is more than I can say about my hair. But because that started leaving home before I’d even turned 30, I don’t attribute baldness to growing old. I attribute it to God’s being a practical joker.

When I’m asked if there’s anything good about getting older, the first thing that comes to mind is the line I first saw attributed to Maurice Chevalier. When asked that question, he supposedly said, “It’s better than the alternative.”

For my part, I enjoy the fact that being a curmudgeon at 65 seems far more age-appropriate than being one at 25. When young people are cranky, it’s just tiresome. At my age, being cantankerous is cute.

An added bonus is that I can enjoy women’s company without giving a hoot what they look like. Or worrying what I look like.

On the minus side of the ledger, one of the worst things about getting old is that when you get an ache or suffer even a minor injury, you’re not sure you’ll ever get over it. For instance, I hurt the heel of my left foot three weeks ago and I’m still hobbling around on it. At this point, although nothing’s broken, I have no assurance it will ever be better, no way of knowing whether my temporary exile from the tennis courts will be permanent.

The other depressing thing is that it’s inevitable that I will be spending more and more time with doctors and nurses, more time being probed and poked, more time in examination rooms sitting around in my shorts, awaiting the latest indignities modern medicine can foist on me. It’s only a matter of time until I will be spending far more time checking my blood pressure than checking box scores.

Even though my stamina isn’t what it used to be, even though arthritis has established a beachhead in my hands and my eyesight certainly isn’t what it was, the one bright spot in all this is that I have somehow become stronger than ever. Frankly, I’m at a loss for an explanation. All I know is that it wasn’t so long ago that it required both my arms to carry $20 worth of groceries into the house. I’m now proud to say I can carry $40 worth with one arm tied behind my back.

Labels: Culture: General, Humor

Burt Prelutsky has written for Dragnet, McMillan & Wife, MASH, Mary Tyler Moore, Rhoda, Bob Newhart, Family Ties, Dr. Quinn, and Diagnosis Murder. He wrote a humor column for the Los Angeles Times and was the movie critic for Los Angeles magazine. His most recent book is Conservatives Are From Mars, Liberals Are From San Francisco (A Hollywood Rightwinger Comes Out of the Closet).
BurtPrelutsky@aol.com
Visit their website at: http://www.burtprelutsky.com/

Read more articles by Burt Prelutsky on IntellectualConservative.com

 

Responses to "On Being 65"

  1. Your added strength is indeed a benefit of aging. Call it a "second wind" of cellular health and vitality. I have found evidence of this among those I most admire.
    mlv

    Comment by Matthew Verrill | January 11, 2006

  2. Amen, brother!!! I will turn 65 Sunday the 15th. First I can't believe I'm that old. When I got my Medicare card I was actually glad!!I have arthritis too in my knees and that causes me a problem but I do the same routine you do, I visit my various specialists, get their good word, get my scripts filled and pray they work and I don't come up with another afliction between visits!!!All in all it is necessary to as Paul put it: " to be content in whatever circumstance I am in"! All in all the Bible is a better "bible" than Merks ( a medicat dictionary).It at least covers the age, the condition, the soul and the help to get thru it.Its a journey, go thru it screaming and shouting and be totally worn out when you get to the end, but happy!!!

    Comment by Penny Amos | January 14, 2006

  3. I think the business about the groceries might also have been a comment on the rising price of everything, including groceries.

    Comment by Joanna Fuchs | January 21, 2006

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.







Latest Articles

Obama’s Limited Intelligence
 by Aaron Goldstein
Why Panetta?
 by Phillip Ellis Jackson
Is Israeli Policy Crazy?
 by Ivan Eland
Military Keynesianism to the Rescue?
 by Robert Higgs
Conservative Reformation
 by Alan Roebuck
Thoughts: Young Camille Paglia’s Protest Letter, Coulter’s Invitations & Snowmen
 by Ben-Peter Terpstra
Ayers and Dohrn are Liars
 by Thomas E. Brewton
Terrorists' Rights Versus Crime Prevention
 by Rachel Alexander
Duly Noted
 by George de Poor Handlery



Book Reviews



Features







         Top 25