Comments on: How to Beat Hillary in 2008 http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/02/12/how-to-beat-hillary-in-2008/ Conservative and Libertarian Intellectual Philosophy and Politics Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:00:53 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Cabler http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/02/12/how-to-beat-hillary-in-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-17567 Cabler Fri, 11 Aug 2006 14:14:07 +0000 http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/how-to-beat-hillary-in-2008/#comment-17567 It would be more prudent than not to have a "smart" person as President. That seems to be the only aspect of Ms. Clinton's character everyone agrees upon. A separate but germaine question is when did a huge military--read huge budget with an even larger waste of taxpayer funding through the behemoth political and bureaucratic industrial complex it entails--become the aspiration for a group noted for their disdain of big government and love of personal wealth? It would be more prudent than not to have a “smart” person as President. That seems to be the only aspect of Ms. Clinton’s character everyone agrees upon.

A separate but germaine question is when did a huge military–read huge budget with an even larger waste of taxpayer funding through the behemoth political and bureaucratic industrial complex it entails–become the aspiration for a group noted for their disdain of big government and love of personal wealth?

]]> By: McDorman http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/02/12/how-to-beat-hillary-in-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-6223 McDorman Mon, 29 May 2006 15:30:13 +0000 http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/how-to-beat-hillary-in-2008/#comment-6223 I myself will not support Clinton#2. She's completly to far left. However, we as conservatives cannoy underestimate her political poweras a candidate. Moreover, the power and weight she would carry as the Vice President. I myself will not support Clinton#2. She’s completly to far left. However, we as conservatives
cannoy underestimate her political poweras a candidate. Moreover, the power and weight she would carry as the Vice President.

]]> By: mark http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/02/12/how-to-beat-hillary-in-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-1676 mark Fri, 14 Apr 2006 07:08:14 +0000 http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/how-to-beat-hillary-in-2008/#comment-1676 I agree with the latest post. I would like to think the conservative intellectual is based mainly off of reason and logic instead of typical liberal rhetoric. Im tired of conservatives like Rush and Hannity using terms, that liberals use rhetoric in describing an opponent as an angry and bitter person. Theres people in every political ideology that are angry and bitter. Those have nothing to do political credentials. She has a socialist upbringing from her college days up to the present. The pathetic article also used right wing sources, American Conservative Union and Fox News (which can be seen by some as being right-lean) and left wing groups like NARAL and SANE to describe their stance on her. It's not rocket sncience knowing that conservative groups don't like Hillary and leftist ones do. Im sick and tired of reading daily news reports that state these obvious facts. I love the comment "once a socialist, always a socialist." Since her new left teachings at college all the way through she has been a major proponent of welfarism, radical feminism and environmentalism, anti-war sentiments, and an overall massively government advocate. Anyone can see this by her comments and voting record on the net. Obviously in order to become pres she's going to have to come to the right more as a moderate and become a hawk (by voting for a few out of hundreds of defense projects and national defense legislation) but then again that can be seen by selling out her own cause. She's a smart woman that knows theres a means to an end and will go back to her counterculture leftist roots. I agree with the latest post. I would like to think the conservative intellectual is based mainly off of reason and logic instead of typical liberal rhetoric. Im tired of conservatives like Rush and Hannity using terms, that liberals use rhetoric in describing an opponent as an angry and bitter person. Theres people in every political ideology that are angry and bitter. Those have nothing to do political credentials. She has a socialist upbringing from her college days up to the present. The pathetic article also used right wing sources, American Conservative Union and Fox News (which can be seen by some as being right-lean) and left wing groups like NARAL and SANE to describe their stance on her. It’s not rocket sncience knowing that conservative groups don’t like Hillary and leftist ones do. Im sick and tired of reading daily news reports that state these obvious facts. I love the comment “once a socialist, always a socialist.” Since her new left teachings at college all the way through she has been a major proponent of welfarism, radical feminism and environmentalism, anti-war sentiments, and an overall massively government advocate. Anyone can see this by her comments and voting record on the net. Obviously in order to become pres she’s going to have to come to the right more as a moderate and become a hawk (by voting for a few out of hundreds of defense projects and national defense legislation) but then again that can be seen by selling out her own cause. She’s a smart woman that knows theres a means to an end and will go back to her counterculture leftist roots.

]]> By: Paul Macdonald http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/02/12/how-to-beat-hillary-in-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-1010 Paul Macdonald Tue, 14 Mar 2006 15:23:18 +0000 http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/how-to-beat-hillary-in-2008/#comment-1010 It is sad that you resort to such language to descibe people. Are you that frightened that she is going to win. It is sad that you resort to such language to descibe people. Are you that frightened that she is going to win.

]]> By: jason http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/02/12/how-to-beat-hillary-in-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-368 jason Tue, 14 Feb 2006 04:23:01 +0000 http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/how-to-beat-hillary-in-2008/#comment-368 LOL if Hillary is an objectivist, that must make President Reagan a Marxist. LOL if Hillary is an objectivist, that must make President Reagan a Marxist.

]]> By: G of Sedona http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/02/12/how-to-beat-hillary-in-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-366 G of Sedona Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:42:59 +0000 http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/how-to-beat-hillary-in-2008/#comment-366 "Hillary favors universal healthcare, and when she was put in charge of it at the Clinton White House, failed miserably." Bill put her in charge of reforming the public education system in Arkansas when he was governor, and also failed miserably. Has she ever managed ANYTHING successfully? “Hillary favors universal healthcare, and when she was put in charge of it at the Clinton White House, failed miserably.”

Bill put her in charge of reforming the public education system in Arkansas when he was governor, and also failed miserably. Has she ever managed ANYTHING successfully?

]]> By: Dan Behrens http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/02/12/how-to-beat-hillary-in-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-363 Dan Behrens Mon, 13 Feb 2006 18:36:10 +0000 http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/how-to-beat-hillary-in-2008/#comment-363 Fiscally, what is the difference? I despise the left wing agenda, but truth be told, would have a GOP Congress passed our transportation budget under a democratic White House? I doubt it. As for as pandering to win an office, how in the world could it be done anymore than it is? Fiscally, what is the difference? I despise the left wing agenda, but truth be told, would have a GOP Congress passed our transportation budget under a democratic White House? I doubt it. As for as pandering to win an office, how in the world could it be done anymore than it is?

]]> By: Chris http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/02/12/how-to-beat-hillary-in-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-360 Chris Mon, 13 Feb 2006 16:12:47 +0000 http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/how-to-beat-hillary-in-2008/#comment-360 To those who vote to "split" the Executive and Legislative branches: Let's think this through. In your oh-so-clever ploy to split the branches, you will vote for a left leaning candidate for president? What message will this send to ALL potential politicians? They will, more likely than not, look at the results and say, "Gee, looks like the public supports a left-leaning agenda. If I want to win office, I'd better pander to that." The result? A shift to the left at all levels of government. Just what we need... To those who vote to “split” the Executive and Legislative branches:

Let’s think this through. In your oh-so-clever ploy to split the branches, you will vote for a left leaning candidate for president? What message will this send to ALL potential politicians? They will, more likely than not, look at the results and say, “Gee, looks like the public supports a left-leaning agenda. If I want to win office, I’d better pander to that.”

The result? A shift to the left at all levels of government. Just what we need…

]]> By: Dan Behrens http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/02/12/how-to-beat-hillary-in-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-355 Dan Behrens Mon, 13 Feb 2006 12:40:18 +0000 http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/how-to-beat-hillary-in-2008/#comment-355 The best way to defeat Hillary is to simply give her all the air time she wants. Give that woman enough rope and she will hang herself. She has been a phony in every aspect of her public life, and seemingly her private one as well. This flaw will not hold up during a national campaign. I do strongly agree with Lincoln Uyeda's comments however as far as it is conceivable the only way to get a GOP House and Senate to act like Conservatives may be to have a Democrat *(gasp)* in the White House. The spending of this Congress and President surpass even FDR in short-sighted stupidity. Years from now we will look back on this Congress and this President as the worst keepers of our tax dollars in history, and sadly they ran as Republicans . We need Conservatives to represent us, RINO's have changed the chant of "tax and spend democrats" to "spend and deficit republicans." We have become what we despised, and winning an election has taken precedent over fiscal conservatism. Ronald Reagan is turning in his grave. The best way to defeat Hillary is to simply give her all the air time she wants. Give that woman enough rope and she will hang herself. She has been a phony in every aspect of her public life, and seemingly her private one as well. This flaw will not hold up during a national campaign. I do strongly agree with Lincoln Uyeda’s comments however as far as it is conceivable the only way to get a GOP House and Senate to act like Conservatives may be to have a Democrat *(gasp)* in the White House. The spending of this Congress and President surpass even FDR in short-sighted stupidity. Years from now we will look back on this Congress and this President as the worst keepers of our tax dollars in history, and sadly they ran as Republicans . We need Conservatives to represent us, RINO’s have changed the chant of “tax and spend democrats” to “spend and deficit republicans.” We have become what we despised, and winning an election has taken precedent over fiscal conservatism. Ronald Reagan is turning in his grave.

]]> By: Mistress Moon http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/02/12/how-to-beat-hillary-in-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-353 Mistress Moon Mon, 13 Feb 2006 11:18:07 +0000 http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/how-to-beat-hillary-in-2008/#comment-353 Comment for Lincoln Uyeda. Would you mind pointing out for me where Mrs. Clinton has stated that she is an Ayn Rand supporter? I would like to see how she can justify supporting objectivism and socialism at the same time. This is the woman who claims that it "takes a village to raise a child" and wants to push her "free health care" on the taxpayers. Hillary stands for everything that Ayn Rand so vocally abhorred. Comment for Lincoln Uyeda.

Would you mind pointing out for me where Mrs. Clinton has stated that she is an Ayn Rand supporter? I would like to see how she can justify supporting objectivism and socialism at the same time. This is the woman who claims that it “takes a village to raise a child” and wants to push her “free health care” on the taxpayers. Hillary stands for everything that Ayn Rand so vocally abhorred.

]]>