<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In Defense Of Ann Coulter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/02/14/in-defense-of-ann-coulter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/02/14/in-defense-of-ann-coulter/</link>
	<description>Conservative and Libertarian Intellectual Philosophy and Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 02:17:58 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: A.C. Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/02/14/in-defense-of-ann-coulter/comment-page-2/#comment-7535</link>
		<dc:creator>A.C. Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2006 20:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/in-defense-of-ann-coulter/#comment-7535</guid>
		<description>Of Hyperbole &amp; Slander… one Christian’s perspective.

Whether or not Ann Coulter’s unkind comments toward the widows of 9-11 slanders them, will be a matter for lesser courts; but her ongoing and arguably un-Christian self-promotion through hateful hyperbole, perhaps calculated for maximum fame and profit, belies the crucifix she wears around her neck, and  slanders our Christ, whose love and sacrifice it represents.  As Christians, we will love Ann, but must challenge her words and actions, when they are so contrary to our Lord’s example, and could threaten the inheritance of so many.  For the sake of our children, who look toward our example and what we value and reward, we must stand up, and speak out.

Ann’s compassionate conservatism was contrasted by her vitriol, in recent television interviews.  Regrettably, her style and manner remains consistent, buoyed no doubt by monetary reward and celebrity. Is this what we, regardless our religion or politics, hope to stand for?  Is this what we choose to reward?  Is this the legacy we would leave for our children? 

I could not take my eyes off the beautiful cross around her neck, and wonder its effect on those who might otherwise be attracted to life through the Lord.  I pray that if she is to continue to wear a cross in venues where so many can see and hear her, she would act in a way that brings more people to God, than repels them, and that she reflects peace and light in her life.  For all of us who might be attracted to the attacks and divisiveness that our society now seems to crave and reward,  it would be better to study the life and teachings of Christ, and pray for the wisdom and strength to pattern our lives closer to His.  

We are taught to know a thing by the fruit it bears, and too much is but bitter and poisonous.  None of us can be perfect, but all of us can be better than this.  And when we fail, as we all do at times, nothing goes further than a sincere apology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of Hyperbole &amp; Slander… one Christian’s perspective.</p>
<p>Whether or not Ann Coulter’s unkind comments toward the widows of 9-11 slanders them, will be a matter for lesser courts; but her ongoing and arguably un-Christian self-promotion through hateful hyperbole, perhaps calculated for maximum fame and profit, belies the crucifix she wears around her neck, and  slanders our Christ, whose love and sacrifice it represents.  As Christians, we will love Ann, but must challenge her words and actions, when they are so contrary to our Lord’s example, and could threaten the inheritance of so many.  For the sake of our children, who look toward our example and what we value and reward, we must stand up, and speak out.</p>
<p>Ann’s compassionate conservatism was contrasted by her vitriol, in recent television interviews.  Regrettably, her style and manner remains consistent, buoyed no doubt by monetary reward and celebrity. Is this what we, regardless our religion or politics, hope to stand for?  Is this what we choose to reward?  Is this the legacy we would leave for our children? </p>
<p>I could not take my eyes off the beautiful cross around her neck, and wonder its effect on those who might otherwise be attracted to life through the Lord.  I pray that if she is to continue to wear a cross in venues where so many can see and hear her, she would act in a way that brings more people to God, than repels them, and that she reflects peace and light in her life.  For all of us who might be attracted to the attacks and divisiveness that our society now seems to crave and reward,  it would be better to study the life and teachings of Christ, and pray for the wisdom and strength to pattern our lives closer to His.  </p>
<p>We are taught to know a thing by the fruit it bears, and too much is but bitter and poisonous.  None of us can be perfect, but all of us can be better than this.  And when we fail, as we all do at times, nothing goes further than a sincere apology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: An ex-grunt</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/02/14/in-defense-of-ann-coulter/comment-page-2/#comment-630</link>
		<dc:creator>An ex-grunt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 21:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/in-defense-of-ann-coulter/#comment-630</guid>
		<description>Remember the old blonde joke, “What do intelligent blondes and UFO’s have in common?  We hear a lot about how they really exist but we have yet to see one!”  Well, Ann is proof that UFOs do exist!  First, she is hot!  Second, she got brain cells!  Third, she knows how to use those brain cells!  Fourth, did I mention she’s hot!  OH!  Please excuse my hormonal distractions…the only bad this about Ann is that she is a lawyer, but I can forgive and over look her youthful indiscretions. (That was a joke folks, calm down!!)

Ann is dead on the mark with her comments about the Muslim terrorists.  And although I have no problem with folks who have a different opinion, I do oppose those folks who are ignorant of what the Muslim world is trying to tell us.  Ann just got it right and or she understands what the Muslim world is trying to tell us.  Maybe we should listen a little closer to the Muslim world also, we might learn a thing or tow about them and their intentions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember the old blonde joke, “What do intelligent blondes and UFO’s have in common?  We hear a lot about how they really exist but we have yet to see one!”  Well, Ann is proof that UFOs do exist!  First, she is hot!  Second, she got brain cells!  Third, she knows how to use those brain cells!  Fourth, did I mention she’s hot!  OH!  Please excuse my hormonal distractions…the only bad this about Ann is that she is a lawyer, but I can forgive and over look her youthful indiscretions. (That was a joke folks, calm down!!)</p>
<p>Ann is dead on the mark with her comments about the Muslim terrorists.  And although I have no problem with folks who have a different opinion, I do oppose those folks who are ignorant of what the Muslim world is trying to tell us.  Ann just got it right and or she understands what the Muslim world is trying to tell us.  Maybe we should listen a little closer to the Muslim world also, we might learn a thing or tow about them and their intentions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/02/14/in-defense-of-ann-coulter/comment-page-2/#comment-563</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 18:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/in-defense-of-ann-coulter/#comment-563</guid>
		<description>DebO,

To suggest that Ann Coulter is not an intellectual simply because she speaks the truth with force, is simply sticking your head in the sand.  This is typical of Democrats:  I disagree with you, therefore, you are ignorant.  That&#039;s how they tried to paint Reagan, that&#039;s how they still portray W., and that&#039;s another reason why they have lost election after election.  

To suggest that she is bitter simply betrays a willful blindness to her amazing sense of humor, wit, and linguistic mastery.  

Lastly, as a matter of perspective, Democrats&#039; most precious sacrament, abortion, is responsible for more deaths than Hitler and al-Qaida combined, so maybe &quot;sworn enemies&quot; is rather appropriate for those who want to protect innocent life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DebO,</p>
<p>To suggest that Ann Coulter is not an intellectual simply because she speaks the truth with force, is simply sticking your head in the sand.  This is typical of Democrats:  I disagree with you, therefore, you are ignorant.  That&#039;s how they tried to paint Reagan, that&#039;s how they still portray W., and that&#039;s another reason why they have lost election after election.  </p>
<p>To suggest that she is bitter simply betrays a willful blindness to her amazing sense of humor, wit, and linguistic mastery.  </p>
<p>Lastly, as a matter of perspective, Democrats&#039; most precious sacrament, abortion, is responsible for more deaths than Hitler and al-Qaida combined, so maybe &#034;sworn enemies&#034; is rather appropriate for those who want to protect innocent life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cynical Skeptic</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/02/14/in-defense-of-ann-coulter/comment-page-2/#comment-479</link>
		<dc:creator>Cynical Skeptic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 01:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/in-defense-of-ann-coulter/#comment-479</guid>
		<description>A Danish political cartoonist&#039;s artwork implies that Islam may not be a &quot;religion of peace&quot;. 
In response, Muslims place a petrol-soaked tire around an innocent Christian man and burn him alive. With machetes, they hack to death, other innocent Christians including children, during an orgy of murder and arson.  How dare anyone imply that Islam is not peaceful!  Ann Coulter should  give these peace-loving people the respect and dignity they deserve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Danish political cartoonist&#039;s artwork implies that Islam may not be a &#034;religion of peace&#034;.<br />
In response, Muslims place a petrol-soaked tire around an innocent Christian man and burn him alive. With machetes, they hack to death, other innocent Christians including children, during an orgy of murder and arson.  How dare anyone imply that Islam is not peaceful!  Ann Coulter should  give these peace-loving people the respect and dignity they deserve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous256</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/02/14/in-defense-of-ann-coulter/comment-page-2/#comment-477</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous256</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2006 18:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/in-defense-of-ann-coulter/#comment-477</guid>
		<description>From the Canadian Press
Sat Feb 18 2006,

MAIDUGURI, Nigeria (AP) - Nigerian Muslims protesting against caricatures of the Prophet Muhammad attacked Christians and burned churches Saturday, killing at least 15 people in the deadliest confrontation yet in the whirlwind of Muslim anger over the drawings.

It was the first major protest to erupt over the issue in Africa&#039;s most-populous country. Mobs of Muslim protesters swarmed through the city centre of Maiduguri with machetes, sticks and iron rods. One group threw a tire around a man, poured gas on him and set him ablaze. 

...

Anyone still offended by the word rag-head?

If you are still offended then you better check yourself in the nearest health clinic, or you better move to the Middle East where you will fit in nicely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the Canadian Press<br />
Sat Feb 18 2006,</p>
<p>MAIDUGURI, Nigeria (AP) &#8211; Nigerian Muslims protesting against caricatures of the Prophet Muhammad attacked Christians and burned churches Saturday, killing at least 15 people in the deadliest confrontation yet in the whirlwind of Muslim anger over the drawings.</p>
<p>It was the first major protest to erupt over the issue in Africa&#039;s most-populous country. Mobs of Muslim protesters swarmed through the city centre of Maiduguri with machetes, sticks and iron rods. One group threw a tire around a man, poured gas on him and set him ablaze. </p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>Anyone still offended by the word rag-head?</p>
<p>If you are still offended then you better check yourself in the nearest health clinic, or you better move to the Middle East where you will fit in nicely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vegamopeepus</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/02/14/in-defense-of-ann-coulter/comment-page-2/#comment-470</link>
		<dc:creator>vegamopeepus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2006 10:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/in-defense-of-ann-coulter/#comment-470</guid>
		<description>Many years ago, in response to a comment regading the offense nature of some of the comedic skits of the Monty python troupe,  actor John Cleese remarked, &quot;there are some people one should wish to offend!&quot; I couldn&#039;t agreee more. I love Ann Coulter, she can sit on my face anytime!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many years ago, in response to a comment regading the offense nature of some of the comedic skits of the Monty python troupe,  actor John Cleese remarked, &#034;there are some people one should wish to offend!&#034; I couldn&#039;t agreee more. I love Ann Coulter, she can sit on my face anytime!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T. Parker</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/02/14/in-defense-of-ann-coulter/comment-page-2/#comment-465</link>
		<dc:creator>T. Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2006 04:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/in-defense-of-ann-coulter/#comment-465</guid>
		<description>&quot;Rag-head&quot; is a convenient racial slur to describe the enemies of the U.S.A.  We can blow them up, 
but, man-oh-man, don&#039;t call them names??!?  Come on, people.  War is hell... call them names, 
shoot them, bomb them, stab them, take their stuff, nuke them... that&#039;s what war is all about.
Now we bomb and negotiate... bomb and rebuild, bomb and then bring food.

Screw that.  Let&#039;s just go to it and be done with.  Everyone should stop being so sensitive and learn
to destroy an enemy without mercy or remorse.  Otherwise, kiss America goodbye.

Don&#039;t believe it?  Whatever helps you sleep at night...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#034;Rag-head&#034; is a convenient racial slur to describe the enemies of the U.S.A.  We can blow them up,<br />
but, man-oh-man, don&#039;t call them names??!?  Come on, people.  War is hell&#8230; call them names,<br />
shoot them, bomb them, stab them, take their stuff, nuke them&#8230; that&#039;s what war is all about.<br />
Now we bomb and negotiate&#8230; bomb and rebuild, bomb and then bring food.</p>
<p>Screw that.  Let&#039;s just go to it and be done with.  Everyone should stop being so sensitive and learn<br />
to destroy an enemy without mercy or remorse.  Otherwise, kiss America goodbye.</p>
<p>Don&#039;t believe it?  Whatever helps you sleep at night&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M Jacobson</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/02/14/in-defense-of-ann-coulter/comment-page-1/#comment-460</link>
		<dc:creator>M Jacobson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2006 13:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/in-defense-of-ann-coulter/#comment-460</guid>
		<description>Great job Ann!  We are at war with the violent wing of Islam and we cannot afford 
the luxury of nuance.  Get ready, because they are coming for our heads.  We won&#039;t survive by 
sitting around worrying about their feelings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great job Ann!  We are at war with the violent wing of Islam and we cannot afford<br />
the luxury of nuance.  Get ready, because they are coming for our heads.  We won&#039;t survive by<br />
sitting around worrying about their feelings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous256</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/02/14/in-defense-of-ann-coulter/comment-page-1/#comment-453</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous256</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2006 02:59:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/in-defense-of-ann-coulter/#comment-453</guid>
		<description>Fri. Feb. 17 2006 10:09 AM ET

A leading Pakistani cleric has offered a 1.5 million rupee reward and a car to anyone who kills the cartoonist who drew Prophet Muhammad, reports say.

Mohammed Yousaf Qureshi, prayer leader at the historic Mohabat Khan mosque in Peshawar, announced he would give a 1.5 million rupee ($25,000 US) reward and a car for killing the cartoonist of the prophet pictures that appeared first in a Danish newspaper, The Associated Press reported.

&quot;This is an unanimous decision of by all imams of Islam that whoever insults the prophet deserves to be killed and whoever will take this insulting man to his end, will get this prize,&quot; Qureshi was quoted as saying by AP.&quot;

...

I agree &quot;rag head&quot; is not the right word... seventh century barbarians is more like it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fri. Feb. 17 2006 10:09 AM ET</p>
<p>A leading Pakistani cleric has offered a 1.5 million rupee reward and a car to anyone who kills the cartoonist who drew Prophet Muhammad, reports say.</p>
<p>Mohammed Yousaf Qureshi, prayer leader at the historic Mohabat Khan mosque in Peshawar, announced he would give a 1.5 million rupee ($25,000 US) reward and a car for killing the cartoonist of the prophet pictures that appeared first in a Danish newspaper, The Associated Press reported.</p>
<p>&#034;This is an unanimous decision of by all imams of Islam that whoever insults the prophet deserves to be killed and whoever will take this insulting man to his end, will get this prize,&#034; Qureshi was quoted as saying by AP.&#034;</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>I agree &#034;rag head&#034; is not the right word&#8230; seventh century barbarians is more like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Young</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/02/14/in-defense-of-ann-coulter/comment-page-1/#comment-446</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 21:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2006/in-defense-of-ann-coulter/#comment-446</guid>
		<description>Wait a minute debO.  We shouldn&#039;t leave out the liberal news media.  I don&#039;t know who is worse the media or democrats but I sure wouldn&#039;t want to have to live on the difference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait a minute debO.  We shouldn&#039;t leave out the liberal news media.  I don&#039;t know who is worse the media or democrats but I sure wouldn&#039;t want to have to live on the difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
