France, the birth-place of socialism, is now living socialism's logical end-game.
Mobs in the streets of France, led by university students, are smashing store-fronts, burning automobiles, barricading streets, and their labor union buddies are threatening a syndicalist general strike.
The occasion for this fulmination is the proposed enactment of a first-job contract law that would permit businesses to fire a worker under the age of 25 for any reason during his first two years of employment.
These reactions are idiotic. Students are rioting against legal action to make it easier for them to get jobs, a process with limited prospects of success today.
Unemployment overall is somewhere well north of 10% and nearly 25% among people under age 25.
The reason for this is, in short, socialism.
More specifically, the problem is similar to what labor unions working with welfare-state government have created in the United States. Employers are reluctant to hire new workers full time, resorting to temp agencies instead, because union contracts and government regulations make hiring full-time extraordinarily expensive and layoffs both costly and time consuming.
France's proposed first-job contract law was intended to diminish this punitive burden and thereby to encourage employers to hire more young people.
This, however, is only the tip of the iceberg. Even for those fortunate enough to have jobs, the French economy is in worse shape than any of the other majors in Europe. And this is just what the French seem to desire, because the idea of free-market competition, the only route to innovation and job growth, is regarded as American barbarism.
The French, in effect, don't want cradle-to-grave government benefits; they want to be embalmed and laid to rest at birth.
As Alexis de Tocqueville wrote in the 1850s, after half-a-century of socialism in France, the French had become a nation of self-centered people, heedless of the greater good of society, intent only upon getting their prescribed government benefits, and prepared to endure any degree of despotism, so long as the benefits arrived.






































Well said. Socialism can’t work. The reasons for this are pretty basic. A system that takes away incentives, punishes innovation, and rewards imcompetence… Hmmm. Yep, sounds like a real winner alright. Now try explaining that to the libs. And they have the balls to accuse us of hiding our heads in the ground. Amazing.
Sadly, this is the same direction our once-great country is tending. If our forefathers could see us now…
The two things Washington told our country never to do: 1) Don’t have a two party system, and 2) Don’t make entangling alliances.
Looks like we did that by 1800 for sure.
After shaking Ronald Reagan’s hand in 1980 while I was a student at Purdue,
I changed my party affiliation to Republican. Now, after 26 years I’m ready for
someone to start a “conservative party.” I’m tired of open boarders, out of
control Government growth, the Republican welfare state and taxes have
never been higher. They “create” more Government agencies and as April
15th looms…I CAN’T UNDERSTAND THE 6 MILLION WORD IRS
CODE AND LIKE 40 MILLION OTHER AMERICANS, HAVE TO PAY
SOMEONE ELSE TO DO WHAT I SHOULD DO FOR MYSELF! Who ever
coined the phrase DEMOPUBLICANS hit the nail on the head! HELP!