So long as agricultural employers cannot fill jobs with American citizens or legal residents, they will be more than happy to fill those vacancies with people who enter the United States illegally.
Earlier this month, Senator John McCain received a rough ride when he spoke before the AFL-CIO in Washington, D.C. McCain, who will likely seek the Republican nomination for the 2008 Presidential race, did not impress AFL-CIO members with his proposed guest worker program for illegal immigrants. While the labor movement tends to be sympathetic towards illegal immigrants, others in the labor movement oppose illegal immigration on the grounds that it depresses wages.
During the question and answer session that followed his speech, union members challenged the merits of a guest worker program. For his part, McCain offered his audience $50/hour to pick lettuce in Arizona. A number of delegates indicated they would be more than happy to take him up on his offer. But McCain replied, “You can’t do it, my friends.” Union members were not impressed with having their work ethic questioned.
Senator McCain, if I were offered $50 an hour to pick lettuce, not only would I pick lettuce but I would pick carrots, radishes, tomatoes and any other produce submerged beneath the ground. For $50 an hour I might also concoct a smashing balsamic vinaigrette dressing.
This was not Senator McCain’s finest hour. He deserves to be criticized for this position. Let me rephrase that statement. He deserves to be constructively criticized for this position.
Radio talk show host Tammy Bruce, a self described classical liberal, pilloried McCain on her website on April 6th. Bruce writes, “Let me be blunt. McCain is a self-serving, opportunistic pig.” Wow! What incisive political commentary. But wait, it gets better. “And we’ve got the perfect combo of that scourge with the McCain-Kennedy immigration bill — McCain clearly has learned a lot from Kennedy about the strategy of abandoning someone and leaving them to drown,” writes Bruce.
Bruce does make a point that our soldiers earn a relatively modest living doing a far more dangerous job. That’s all very well and good, but someone evidently forgot to tell Bruce that McCain served in Vietnam and spent nearly six years as a POW. McCain does not need a lecture from Tammy Bruce about the plight of our soldiers and the perils that face them every day. She cannot begin to comprehend what McCain had to endure at the hands of the Viet Cong. Bruce can disagree with McCain’s remarks (as I do) but is there really any need to call McCain “a self-serving, opportunistic pig” or accuse him “of abandoning someone and leaving them to drown?” Quite honestly, it contributes absolutely nothing to the vital national debate concerning illegal immigration. Bruce’s comments ultimately serve no purpose and ought not be taken seriously.
What Senator McCain ought to have done is offer AFL-CIO members $7.25 an hour to accompany him to Arizona and pick lettuce. He might not have had so many takers.
According to the National Agricultural Workers Survey (NAWS) which was published by the U.S. Department of Labor, the average hourly wage for farm workers is $7.25 an hour. Released in March 2005, the survey is based on interviews conducted with 6,472 farm workers between October 2000 and September 2002.
The statistics are quite illuminating. Seventy-five percent of all farm workers in this country were born in Mexico. When one includes farm workers from other parts of Latin America, more than half of these workers (53%) are here illegally. Only 23% of farm workers were born in the United States.
Additionally, farm workers work an average of 42 hours a week, earn an average annual individual income between $10,000 to $12,499, with a total average annual family income between $15,000 to $17,499. Only 23% have some form of health insurance. If lettuce pickers made $50 an hour, one suspects that nearly 100% would have some form of health insurance.
If the AFL-CIO members were aware of this information, somehow I don’t think Senator McCain would have had as many volunteers willing to follow him to Arizona to pick lettuce. How many of you reading this article knowing these facts would be prepared to pick lettuce as your chosen vocation?
This is not a question of the American work ethic. There are clearly some Americans who pick lettuce for a living. It is that there are not enough Americans willing to pick lettuce for a living.
Our policymakers can erect fences and place the National Guard on the border with Mexico. It might deter some from coming here. But it does not address the problem at its very root.
When it comes down to it this is really a question of supply and demand. Americans love their lettuce. In order to satiate this demand, agricultural employers need to find people willing to pick lettuce in order for it to get to market. But if we are to rely solely on the American labor force to pick our lettuce that demand will not be met. There are simply not enough Americans willing to go to Arizona to work in 100 degree weather on their hands and knees to pick lettuce for $7.25 an hour without health insurance and limited access to clean drinking water. Most Americans would rather earn $7.25 an hour working at WalMart, McDonalds or Starbucks. Enter the illegal immigrants from Mexico. They provide the labor supply necessary to meet our demand for lettuce. It’s that simple.
So unless more Americans are prepared to roll up their sleeves, get on their knees and dirty their hands this will be the state of affairs for the foreseeable future. Could the American consumer boycott lettuce? Perhaps. But if Cesar Chavez couldn’t move Americans to give up their Caesar salads I doubt anyone else could. Could the U.S. government encourage agricultural employers to hire Americans and give them a tax credit for it? Sure it could. Could our high schools and colleges have agricultural employers recruit their students on career days for summer jobs? Sure it could. Could the U.S. government fine agricultural employers so heavily for every illegal immigrant they hire that it would not be worth it to them to go that route? Sure it could. These measures either individually or collectively might have the effect of decreasing our dependence on illegal immigrants to pick our lettuce. But these measures will have a marginal effect at best.
None of this is to suggest that the Government of the United States does not have the right to place controls on our border with Mexico. It most certainly does. Erecting a fence, placing military personnel on the border and deporting those who overstay their visas might very well go a long way in addressing this problem. But it will not go all the way. Most Mexicans enter the United States illegally for a reason. A better life for themselves and their families. One might believe illegal immigration to be bad for the United States but let us not kid ourselves. Illegal immigration to the United States would not exist in such large numbers if we did not play a part in it. So long as agricultural employers (and for that matter employers in the construction and restaurant industries) cannot fill their vacancies with American citizens or legal residents, they will be more than happy to fill those vacancies with people who enter the United States illegally and look the other way all the way to the bank.
Now if you will excuse me I’ve got to run to Whole Foods and buy a Ready Pac All American Salad. All this talk of lettuce.







































Possibly the worst post I have ever seen. A response is futile to a brain that has no understanding of basic economics. How do these people survive with such ignorant irresponsible reasoning?
Mr. Goldstein neglects to mention two very relevant points: 1. The average illegal alien in the U.S. is NOT a farm worker and, in fact, works in industry for the exact same wages at legal residents receive due to their use of counterfeit documents making them "legal." 2. Illegal alien farmworkers are typically furnished room and board on top of the wages received. The five year old study puts the hourly wage at $7.25. It may be as high as $10.00 now. Couple that with free room and board, and disposable income for a family is certainly more than many U.S. citizens make. Large farms hire illegals not so that they can pay a lower wage, but because the illegals are less transient than their unskilled, uneducated American counterparts. The liberal U.S. welfare system has all but destroyed the work ethic for lower socio-economic classes of Americans.
He forgot something else…the United States is a First World country. We won't roll up our sleeves to pick lettuce, we'll roll up our sleeves to invent a machine to do it for us. Remember the Bracero program in the 60's? And this, we have a surplus of food. And this, we subsidize farmers. Boy what a deal. Farmers get government welfare and slave labor. Sharecropping and slavery do have a place however…in the 19th century.
In the United States, we invent machines to pick lettuce, unless we have a steady supply of slave labor. Remember the Bracero program? Boy, farmers have it pretty good: taxpayer-financed welfare and slave labor!
I have worked in a vineyard in the late 50, my vineyard with Bracero Labor. The Braceros never made less the 100.00 dollars per day as they were paid piece work. The Braceros were given a place to stay with individual rooms, showers, clothes washers. The Braceros had no intention of staying in the United States as they had nice homes in Mexico and a nice life. They worked the season for about 6 months and had enough money to live on for the rest of the year. You can thank Ceaser Chavez and the uniionization of the farm workers for the demise of the Bracero program. The United Farm Workers earned 3.25 an hour and they were not from Mexico. They would show up for work at about 10 or 11 am, go potty then eat lunch for an hour then it would be too hot to work so they would demand their money, 8 hours at 3.25 and hour without doing one bit of work. Very few of the illegal immigrants work in the fields for any amount of money. They work in construction at a premium wage or draw welfare. The part that should scare you is when you see an illegal immigrant working in a restaurant as they have not had health checkups nor any immumization and do not have the same sanitary habits. Enjoy your next meal.
I agree that the columnist neglects basic economics, especially when he says that most Americans would rather earn the same wage at Walmart and different places. The price level is not fixed! If we were to allow the market consisting of American workers and employers to operate sans illegals, we would find the the equilibrium wage rate would be higher. And if the demand for lettuce is so great that the author incorrectly supposes that we can't suplly enough, I'm guessing that this demand would be fairly inelastic. With an inelastic demand, we would of course see a small change in the quantity of lettuce demanded as price changed. The workers would have to receive a higher wage than they do know, prices would increase for lettuce, and the quantity consumed would decrease by a fairly small percentage. This is the economics of the deal. Personaly, I'd rather we keep the laws we already have and not send the message to the world that we'll reward you if your smart enough to break our laws without getting caught for a certain amount of time.
Test
Unbelievable. What else can you say. I agree with Honker, not even worth arguing with someone so obviously lacking in reasoning and logic.