Capitalism demands moral behavior to function, and Christianity supplies it. A person who cheats someone else is not behaving as a capitalist or a Christian, he is behaving as a thief and lawbreaker. There is no such thing as a greedy capitalist, for as soon as greed manifests in a transaction, the transaction no longer is in the realm of capitalism.

Again, a capitalist must be moral and be law-abiding. If either of these things are absent, then he is no longer a capitalist.

because of the christian conservative view of human nature he often SEEMS amenable to classic “conservative” thought, limited government, capitalism, individual rights, but its a mistake to think that he is. he sees those things not a the best way to do conduct human affairs, but as intrinsically BAD, but “necessary evils” required to deal with “human nature”, which as stated before is “fallen”. his TRUE ideals are IDENTICAL to those of the leftists and thats why the left can always shame him into “compromising” and eschewing his STATED political goals for leftists goals.

Thanks Bush!

First problem: Leftists tell people what leftists believe, and leftists tell people what conservatives believe. These two straw men are not demolished because there are too few prominent conservatives who are willing to speak powerfully and cogently to conservative positions and unmask the failures of leftist philosophy. Newt is one, Rush is another, but by and large, conservatives retreat from their convictions at the first sign of opposition.

After all, no one wants to be viewed as a bigot or a homophobe, which brings us to point two. This favorite weapon of the Left, name-calling, is as effective as it is vapid. One would think that by now conservatives would have developed a glib, potent response. But conservatives engage the debate as framed by leftists rather than reject the premise and go on the attack.

That’s the third point: Conservatives never get around to advancing their agenda because they are constantly on the defensive, and always afraid of criticism. Let’s take tax cuts for example. A little teeny tax cut was passed over the hysterical objections of the left, but it hardly amounts to anything given degree of opposition. Since we know that tax cuts are going to be subject to all sorts of opposition, why don’t conservatives go the whole way and cut 30%?

Lastly, the judges whom are violating the constitution in various ways must be impeached. We have the power to do this, but no will. Why? After all, Roy Moore of Alabama was sent down the road by rabid leftists. What’s stopping us from doing the same with leftist judges who egregiously violate the law and disregard the constitution at will? What would happen if a legislature just ignored a judicial decree that exceeded constitutional boundaries?