Payday loans
Cialis
Car insurance

A Comprehensive Border Security & Immigration Policy

 A three-part proposal for solving immigration: 1) build a fence, 2) eliminate social benefits, and 3) simplify the process of legal immigration.

Sadly, even after President Bush's recent speech on illegal immigration, a truly comprehensive policy to secure our borders and address the influx of illegal aliens (not "undocumented immigrants") has not been put forth. Therefore, I'd like to propose one. The problem of illegal immigration is many faceted, and our approach to combating it must be as well. There is no single "quick fix" – but implementing a comprehensive strategy which addresses the root issues can and will work to provide both security and sanity to the border chaos. Fortunately, there are those taking steps to comprehensively solve this problem. The Maricopa County Attorney's Office in Arizona sponsored the Southwest Conference on Illegal Immigration, Border Security, and Crime last fall, which focused on resolving all of the problems, not just superficial sound bites. Here is what needs to be done:

1) The borders themselves are too easy to physically cross.

We must build a Gulf to Pacific double fence. In areas of highest crossing activity, this fence should be a wall. Observation towers should be erected at appropriate intervals, and in sparsely populated and rarely crossed regions – camera monitoring may be used. The fence should be periodically inspected for breaches, and repairs immediately effected. A program to "adopt a mile" can be instituted, where individuals can contribute a dollar amount to sponsor a mile of the fence to help with funding the project.

The Border Patrol must be effectively staffed. Hiring to attain a truly effective force must be done. The cost to do so is far outweighed by the costs of illegal immigration.

2) There are too many benefits for illegals once they arrive across the border.

We must eliminate automatic citizenship of children born of illegal aliens. There is presently legislation pending in congress to deny citizenship to kids born to parents not here legally. We should go a step further: A constitutional amendment should be enacted stating that citizenship is extended at birth only to the child of a mother who is a US citizen or legal permanent resident. A mother here legally on a temporary visa still should have no right to birth a citizen! One who is not legally in this country to begin with even less so. Citizenship should be constitutionally defined as one who is born in the US of a mother who is a US Citizen or Legal Permanent Resident, or as one who entered the country legally and becomes a naturalized citizen.

Government entitlements of any kind should be denied to anyone who is neither a citizen nor documented legal permanent resident. If someone is unable to support themselves here, and they're not even here legally, it is not the responsibility of the citizens of the United States to provide for them. If we are going to have an entitlement society, let's at least limit it to citizens and legal permanent residents!

The granting of visas must come under greater scrutiny. Tracking should be instituted to ensure they are not over-stayed. Granting of long term visas to people who will not ultimately be seeking citizenship should be more limited. The goal of our immigration policy should be to allow in MORE people who seek to become productive Americans, and fewer of those who want to simply take something from America.

We grant educational visas excessively. Space in our schools is being denied to citizens because those seats are occupied by those who will take our education, return to their nations of origin, and then take our jobs which get outsourced. Why are we educating the world, while our own educational level is sinking below the waterline?

Employers who hire illegal aliens should be severely penalized. The incentive to hire these low-wage workers should be offset by the fear of the consequences of getting caught. Americans can absorb the higher cost of goods more easily than they can absorb the illegals! Sufficient enforcement personnel must be hired to represent a genuine threat to those who would hire illegals for cheap labor. Further, a database should be publicly available on the web, listing those businesses which are found to flagrantly violate the law in their employing of illegals. The public should have the right to know, so they may knowledgably direct their dollars as they choose.

Forget "guest worker" programs. Quit cowtowing to the businesses who attract illegals by hiring them for cheap labor. Make them hire from the existing pool of American workers. Pay what the market demands. There are unemployed people (though less of them, thanks to the improving economy!) who, despite the liberal claim to the contrary, will do these jobs if not given to the near slave waged illegals.

Forget Amnesty. There should be no "statute of limitation" on illegality of residency! If one came here illegally, then as long as they are here, they are here illegally. If we find them, we should deport them. Immediately. Regardless of how long they've been here, what nice people they are, and how productive they've been. Why dishonor those who played by the rules and stood in line and endured the paperwork to come here legally by raising the white flag and legitimizing illegals who have managed to stay here illegally for some length of time? Those who ARE here illegally should live in fear of discovery and deportation.

The common language of the United States is English. It should be the official language as well. There should be a "wall of separation" between government and multi-lingualism! If you come here to stay, you should learn the language. We should not have to provide bilingual schools, street signs, food labels or anything else.

3) It is too difficult for well intentioned people to immigrate legally.

Steps must be taken to streamline the process of legal immigration. We should raise the number of immigrants permitted legally. We are indeed a nation which welcomes people of diverse national and cultural backgrounds. While curtailing border crashing, we should not permit the legal immigration process to be so encumbering as to make the illegal route seem more attractive.

Finally, the goal of our immigration policy should be to strengthen America with more ruggedly individualistic and diverse productive people. It is not our purpose to become nursemaid to an ever growing population of mouths on the government nipple. Therefore, a requirement of legal permanent resident status should be some marketable skill and either a rudimentary understanding of English, or having an English speaking citizen or legal resident sponsor who will take responsibility for the immigrant until such time as that immigrant can demonstrate a rudimentary understanding of English. In addition, all immigrants should be granted a 1 year visa only. At the end of the year they may apply for permanent residency – if they can show gainful employment and productivity. If they cannot, the visa would expire and the person would have to return to their country of origin, and re-apply to re-enter the US if they wish. The US welcomes new productive Americans. We should not, however, willingly play host to parasites.

Share

5 comments to A Comprehensive Border Security & Immigration Policy

  • Bob Stapler

    I agree with your first and second points, but have reservations with the third. I am not overly concerned we can find sufficient quality people to come to this country. There are plenty trying to come in, but many more looking for a free ride. America is a beacon to those wanting a better life and willing to work. However, word is out that our entitlement programs, emergency care on demand, open school programs, and obsession with diversity make coming to the U.S. a guarantee of survival without giving back in equal measure. We have also become a society that enables crime and provides ample opportunity to those who prey on their fellows. Thus, we need to take the emphasis off of diversity and put in on proven work history and longer probationary periods.

  • M. Osborne

    I agree whole-heartedly with points 1 and 2. Point 3 is argueable.

    The arguement that we need the labor is lacking. In the absence of cheap (virtually slave) labor, the free market will lead to increased automation of the tasks that are currently performed by what are essentially second-class citizens. Increased automation will lead to a higher level of skills in our legal labor pool and eliminate the need for cheap labor. At the same time, we strengthen our own position in the world.

    Perhaps if our ancestors had imported cheap horses from foreign countries, we wouldn’t have been forced to develop the automobile.

    While many immigrants are hard-working and would be good citizens, our nation will be better off if they stay home and fix the problems leading them to wish to come to America.

  • Bill White

    Good ideas, well expressed. I am not certain we need to expand our population. There is a case to be made for limits.

  • e.b.miller

    2 out of 3s not bad.

  • mwb

    All three points are good, and should be supported.

    Point #3 seems to be the most necessary to immigration reform, due to the fact that it gives the good and productive people who wish to immigrate to this country a legal and effective way to do so. Without streamlining the process and increasing the amount of immigrants allowed in from every country, you are stuck with a bunch of people who want to come to this country, but can’t or at least can’t do so in a timely manner. Their only choice will be to risk it, and take a chance on illegal immigration (wether it be sneaking across the border or staying here past their visa). Which will lead us right back to where we are now.

    The only problem I do have is with a part of Point #2, which is the lack of a “guest worker” program. Implementing a “guest worker” program is not “cowtowing to the businesses who attract illegals”. What it is the only effective way to have illegals leave this country and begin the process of legal immigration. Granted if you impose strict sanctions on businesses who hire illegals, most of the jobs will dry up and many will return to Mexico, or their home country. Additionally effective round ups and deportations will remove even more from this country. However, with over 11 million illegals here, most of which the government has no idea who, or where they are, it is likely that most will remain in this country illegally. With no jobs and no ability to get jobs the illegals will become permeant employees of the welfare state, getting free ER care and taking up space in shelters and other free care programs the government provides. The “guest worker” program will give these people an incentive to return to their home countries and begin the process of immigrating here legally. I want to make it clear, they do have to return to their home countries and begin the process from there. No special entitlements should be given to these people and they should not be allowed to begin this process from within the U.S. while they are illegal. Newt Gingrich made this point in a recent speech and I totally agree. As he stated, allowing them to begin the process from here, “makes a fool out of their cousin who’s been sitting at home waiting for a visa”. (Gingrich “5 Challenges America Faces”, August 4, 2005)

Leave a Reply

Articles Archived by Topic