Why Desk Jobs Are (Mildly) Better Than School
by Jonathan David Morris | View comments |
Print This Post
There are many similarities between going to school and having a desk job. If there’s a difference, though, it’s that schools actively put you in situations meant to highlight your shortcomings, while the working world lets you hide your shortcomings behind cubicle walls for weeks at a time.
One of my editors asked me to write a back-to-school column this week. This assignment is difficult for two important reasons:
1. To me, back-to-school means buying school supplies. Unfortunately, I know little about that process. When I was six, my mom overbought book covers, pencils, and folders. It was the only time we ever went shopping for school supplies — ever.
2. I have a desk job. This means my entire life revolves around sitting at a desk, checking the clock, then checking it again because I didn’t really check it the first time. It’s hard for me to get back into that back-to-school mindset. Years after graduation, I feel like I never left.
Indeed, there are many similarities between going to school and having a desk job. If there’s a difference, though, it’s that schools — especially high schools — actively put you in situations meant to highlight your shortcomings, while the working world lets you hide your shortcomings behind cubicle walls for weeks at a time. Officially, this is your reward for being old enough to handle responsibility. Truthfully, it’s because not having personal space would probably lead you to kill yourself. Most companies would rather keep you alive than train a new employee.
Either way, this difference makes having a job at least marginally better and closer to freedom than spending one’s days in our nation’s educational prison system. So rather than dwell on back-to-school issues, I’d like the rest of this column to focus on something more optimistic — namely, a few of the things students are put through, which finally go away when they get out of school.
If you’re reading this as a student, think of this list as a small ray of hope. If you’re reading it as an adult, think of it as a reminder that, no matter how much your life stinks, you still have it better than kids.
ELECTIVES: Every school has courses that students must elect to take. Ostensibly, this means you’re interested in whatever subject those courses are trying to teach you. If you take woodshop, for instance, it means you’d like a career making birdhouses with sharp nails sticking out to endanger the lives of birds. The working world is under no such delusions. People with jobs realize employment has nothing to do with what you enjoy. Instead, you work for whomever offers you the most money at the closest distance to where you live. Then you spend as much of your workday as possible looking up things you enjoy on the Internet. This is called “time management.”
GYM CLASS: For some reason, someone decided a long time ago that schools should consist of long hours spent on plastic chairs. Somewhere along the way, someone felt bad about this, so they decided to give kids an hour of volleyball and exercises in physical intimidation. Thus, the idea of Phys. Ed. was born. Most companies don’t have room for basketball nets and wrestling mats in their offices. For this reason, gym class goes the way of the dodo bird and rational political discourse once you find employment. Unfortunately, this means you can no longer use the expression, “I forgot my clothes,” if you wish to be taken seriously. However, if you find a company with generous health benefits, you can sit on your rear eating candy all day, and your boss will pay to clean your teeth.
PERIODS: Like sentences and the female anatomy, schools derive their very structure from something called periods. Every 45 minutes, a bell rings to make you forget what you just learned, so you can go learn something else. Ultimately, this means you learn nothing about everything. Once you get a job, though, periods go away. At that point, being scatterbrained is called multitasking, and this is considered an asset. The more inefficient you are, the more people figure you must be doing some really good work.
SCHOOL SPIRIT: High school sports hinge on the idea that you should only root for athletes who take the same busses as you do. Since people with jobs usually find their own transportation, the working world operates under a slightly different principle. Instead of pom-poms and marching bands, employers will ask you to be a “good team player.” This probably sounds like the same thing as school spirit, but it isn’t, because it’s easier. Now, all you have to do is pretend you’re listening when other people talk to you, and say things like “What we should do is this” or “What we really need is that” to make it sound like your goals are the same as whomever owns the company. Occasionally, someone dressed as a Cougar or Spartan will come by your desk, urging you to put your hands in the air. That aside, though, it’s a real piece of cake.
SEX EDUCATION: Schools teach about sex by gathering kids together and making the process as awkward as possible. Companies teach about sex by holding Christmas parties and serving vast amounts of alcohol. Of course, this process is still somewhat awkward. On the bright side, however, the alcohol is free.
readjdm@yahoo.com
http://www.readjdm.com/main/
Read more articles by Jonathan David Morris



Very true. It seems to me that it's more the case that schools are aiming to produce student-products that can function more at ease in the cubicle environment; a kind of 'soma pill' curriculum that trains them for the service-factory economy. Paradoxically, is it not possible that any one who did not find himself looking at the clock could be branded a free-thinker? We would expect such to be model employees; but I tend to think that curriculum developers/ideologues view the successfully educated (trained) to be those who disparage the clock, yet obey it. Sex education too merely trains future drones to function properly after work at the local TGIFridays.
Comment by P.S. Borkowski | August 23, 2006
The school system is bad NOT because it makes students sit and learn (how else are they supposed to do it?) but because it teaches them bad IDEAS. As a project of the state, the school system is overwhelmingly pro-state and pro-government, and it teaches children all the modernist, progressive nonsense it can. Once I finished with public schooling, I went to a Catholic school and never looked back. It took them a long time to get me to unlearn all the nonsense I had learned in state-run schools, but I'm glad of it.
Comment by Ted | August 24, 2006
Great humor and with a grain of truth. Still, the assumption schools prepare our kids for anything is a laugh. If it were designed by corporate wise-guys, it would look very different. It would still have that Pavlovian aspect, but the bell-ringing would instill a keenness for work that is the opposite of the asinine irrelevance that is drilled into our kids. Our kids learn to cheat (hey, it’s all relative), scrape by on tests, are given assistance above that needed, and expect the bar will be endlessly lowered and field leveled. That they are encouraged to cheat while learning PC hog-wash would not be cause for concern except for the pattern of cheating it instills. Moreover, they are taught to distain the very capitalism which provides us with decent paying jobs, many of which don’t involve actual effort.
It is said our educational system is outstandingly geared to produce worker-consumers, yet even this has been a fiasco. We have kids who not only can’t make change; they have no idea what things ought to cost! If by consumer, we only mean they are conditioned to spend (as opposed to knowing how to budget), then our education is a success. If by worker, we mean we can get at least an hour of useful work out of them, work that actually brings in a profit sufficient to justify the wage paid them, then, by golly, I guess we’re doing alright there too. That some of our kids learn is a tribute to them and to their parents, not to an educational system that must be circumvented to get a decent, functional education. In fairness, there are some good teachers, but they are grossly outnumbered by those who teach absolute nonsense exceptionally well and overmatched by a system that increasingly precludes real teaching.
What would be refreshing would be for our schools to go ‘Back to School’; by which I mean go back to teaching something of value.
Comment by Bob Stapler | August 26, 2006