September 13th, 2006

Branches More Like Twigs

 by Burt Prelutsky  
| View comments | Print This Post Print This Post

Bob Woodward & Carl BernsteinBurt Prelutsky on the three branches of government plus the "fourth estate."

A recent poll disclosed that of the three branches of government, the one most highly regarded was the judicial.  I found it odd that most Americans felt that way, seeing as how federal judges, unlike those assorted executives and legislators, are appointed, not elected.  And what’s more, these judges are appointed by the very same schlemiels we don’t trust to do their own jobs!

Although I share most people’s attitude towards politicians in general, I do not hold in higher esteem those little tin gods who get to wear bathrobes on the job.  I’m not certain when I first began distrusting judges, but it may have been when, under the leadership of Chief Justice Rose Bird, the California Supreme Court began overruling judges and juries in capital cases.  At one point, they determined that in something like 149 out of 150 cases, the lower courts had erred in sentencing convicted murderers to be executed.  Worst of all, Bird and her cohorts denied that they had an anti-capital punishment agenda. Instead, they employed logic so absurdly convoluted it would have made Lewis Carroll’s head spin in order to justify their farcical rulings.

Since then, we in California have had liberal judges overrule popular votes in which the electorate overwhelmingly voted in favor of capital punishment and against illegal immigration.  Although those high-handed rulings have angered most of the people, one can’t help admiring the dexterity with which these left-wing justices, none of whom need to worry about being re-elected, manage to turn the Constitution on its head.

If I’ve been hard on the judiciary, it’s certainly not because I hold the other two branches in high esteem.  Although I believe that so-called election finance reform is a pipe dream, I think it would help things if we stopped referring to these payments euphemistically as campaign contributions, and started calling them what they really are; which is, bribes.

Now, having dealt with the three official branches of government, it behooves us to consider the unofficial fourth branch, otherwise known as the fourth estate.  If there’s any group in America that’s even smarmier than judges, it’s journalists.  And for that, I blame Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein.

Up until the time that Woodward and Bernstein came along, the only folks who wanted to become journalists were those who had seen The Front Page once too often, and decided nothing could possibly top a life spent trading wisecracks and a bottle of cheap hooch with other ink-stained wretches.  But, thanks to Watergate and the outrageous success of All the President’s Men, left-wing college kids, who might otherwise have become phys ed teachers or gone into the family upholstery business, could envision themselves not only bringing down presidents, but getting rich and famous doing it.

The irony is that in the three decades since Nixon was driven from the Oval Office, all the presidents have served out their terms, but it’s been the media that has been shamed by one scandal after another.  The New York Times, itself, has supplied those of us on the Right with one laugh after another.  Its motto, all the news that’s fit to print, should, in all honesty, be changed to read: all the lies we see fit to print.

To be fair, it’s not the fibs that make the paper so reprehensible.  It’s the snotty attitude which allows it to claim the moral high ground while printing classified information that sabotages America’s war on terrorism.

But, of course when attacked, the paper’s editor and publisher merely point to the scores of Pulitzer Prizes on the wall.  But, we shouldn’t forget that one of those awards went to the paper’s Moscow correspondent in the early 30s for his fawning dispatches about the worker’s paradise overseen by the wise and benevolent Joseph Stalin.  Another Pulitzer went to the Times this past year for printing the news that the government was tracking terrorist activity by monitoring phone calls.  And when you realize that the next Pulitzer will go to the Times for informing the Islamic fascists that the feds have been tracking their money, you better understand why I have suggested that they stop calling it the Pulitzer, after a 19th century newspaper publisher, and re-name it more appropriately in honor of Tokyo Rose.

Humor



Burt Prelutsky has written for Dragnet, McMillan & Wife, MASH, Mary Tyler Moore, Rhoda, Bob Newhart, Family Ties, Dr. Quinn, and Diagnosis Murder. He wrote a humor column for the Los Angeles Times and was the movie critic for Los Angeles magazine. His most recent book is Conservatives Are From Mars, Liberals Are From San Francisco (A Hollywood Rightwinger Comes Out of the Closet).
BurtPrelutsky@aol.com
http://www.burtprelutsky.com/

Read more articles by Burt Prelutsky

Bookmark and Share

  1. Wow, I've never once in my life trusted any public official, so called "civil servant", other member of government with the exception of the military (from the experience of serving therein) but especially the judiciary (why would I trust someone in a position of dictatorial authority I didn't grant, nor can I remove?)
    As for the news media, well, right on brother, right on…

    Comment by Charles | September 14, 2006

  2. I've been a skeptic of authority all my life. Whenever I hear any politician
    (left or right wing) proclaim the "greater good of the American people,"
    I always wonder what benefit they will derive from the "greater good."
    But I must still accept the fact there is little we can do about it…

    About the judges, though: I think it was a mistake on the founding father's
    part to attempt to separate them from politics (they sure didn't stay separate
    long) and that there needs to be tougher criteria for removing the than just
    "poor conduct." We as a nation have spoiled them with power, it's time to
    take it back.

    Comment by Christopher | September 14, 2006

  3. I couldn't agree more. In my book, judges are to be trusted even less than radical blowhard lefties. Because the radical blowhard lefties (and righties, for that matter) are only interested in spewing the rhetoric that their fans want to hear and then maintaining the status quo (the status quo, after all, is what gave them their power and pays their salaries). Judges on the other hand have absolute power. In our system of "checks and balances", the one branch our forefathers forgot about was the judiciary. How did the public vote on abortion? School prayer/"separation of church and state"? Illegal immigration? What's that you say? You never voted for any of that? Of course you didn't, 9 judges got to decide those issues on behalf of the entire country. And the best part is, there's no reprecussions, because voters didn't give those judges their power, and can't take it away! I don't think any truer words have been spoken than these by James Madison: "The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted"

    Comment by Patrick Mulligan | September 15, 2006

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.







Latest Articles

Bad News, Bailouts and Automobiles
 by Steven D. Laib
Obama: Fear and the Security Force
 by Selwyn Duke
We’re Broke, So Let’s Give Our Money to Foreigners
 by Alan Caruba
Nothing But the Truth
 by Phillip Ellis Jackson
Why They Quit Being Leftists
 by Carlos Alberto Montaner
How Barack Obama Will Ensure His Victory in 2012
 by Selwyn Duke
Duly Noted
 by George de Poor Handlery
Happy Days
 by Lisa Fabrizio
Sarah Palin is the Israel of American Politics
 by Aaron Goldstein



Book Reviews



Features







         Top 25