Comments on: The Looney Liberal Chronicles: Chapter 3

By: Australian_Young_Lib

Australian_Young_Lib — Tue, 28 Nov 2006 12:31:58 +0000

The Middle-East is a tricky one. I must admit, I find it impossible to not feel some sympathy for the Palestinian and Lebanese civilians caught in the crossfire, and perhaps in hindsight, the methods that Israel used to defend itself in the last conflict might not have been the most effective in producing the minimum casualties but the fact remains; Israel has every damn right to defend itself.

The same goes for Operation Wrath of God and its portrayal in Spielburgs film. Its regrettable that a few innocent civilians were killed or injured, but again, hardly noteworthy compared to the deliberate slaughter of those Israeli Athletes in 1972. I see the only fault of the Israelis as not killing the perpetrators far earlier.

Also, the Liberals hate America giving aid to Israel for the exact same aid that we hate Syria and Iran giving aid to the terrorists; we’re aiding our allies in the fight against their allies. I wouldnt want my enemy’s allies giving my enemy aid either. The liberals and the terrorists are on the same side, and hence its a conflict of interest, and not an illogical one at that.

By the way, your friends are most interesting people. They seem to represent true liberals. Ignorant, blase and completely out of touch with reality.

By: daverock

daverock — Tue, 21 Nov 2006 15:21:42 +0000

Look, can we concede a point: liberals believe that they, or their ilk, can talk and reason and compromise with with anybody, based on the assumption they understand exactly what the other side wants, and how oppressed the other side is, because, after all, we are America.

This scenario brings up the image of an ignorant english-speaking American speaking loudly and slowly to a foriegner, expecting him to understand.

Spielburg and other liberals say they will fight and die for America, but in reality they will do everything they can, including surrendering our land (they want Israel to do it), and breaking our military down (the Clinton years have forced us to send in reserves to Iraq because of the decimation of our military). They don’t want to fight, they want to COMPROMISE. And isn’t it interesting when our intelligence services talk about a leak or a mole, they use the word “compromised”.

By: sedonaman

sedonaman — Thu, 16 Nov 2006 21:53:38 +0000

“Instead of relying on some consistent, definable (dare I say ‘legal’) criteria, you evaluate everything on your own subjective notion of ‘fairness.’ You apply one set of fairness criteria to judging elections, another set of criteria to international relations, and yet another to a different situation. Thus, any decision you arrive at is ‘fair,’ because it has to be consistent only insofar as that particular situation, since in the final analysis it’s merely a subjective evaluation on your part anyway. ‘Fairness’ is simply the process that supports the outcome you desire.”

This is almost a PERFECT definition of the liberal, and is why liberals had to invent “political correctness.”