The Christmas Grinch Revisited
View Comments | Print This Post Print This Post |

by Burt Prelutsky | December 16th, 2006

isn't ACLU grinch redundantWhen every ACLU lawyer who appears on TV to announce the latest attempt to remove Christian symbols and traditions from America seems to be Jewish, and when it’s a rabbi in Seattle who threatens a lawsuit if a menorah doesn’t take its place among the airport’s Christmas trees, it’s all too easy for Christians to assume the rest of us support this obnoxious campaign.

Nothing that I have ever written has provoked as huge a response as a piece I wrote recently called “The Jewish Grinch That Stole Christmas.”

In the article, which brought me roughly ten times as much e-mail as I’m accustomed to, I suggested that my fellow Jews were at the forefront in waging war on the values and traditions of Christian Americans.

Predictably enough, the response from gentiles was uniformly positive.  The feedback from Jews was somewhat less positive, roughly split between those who admired my courage and those who accused me of being a turncoat.  What I found most telling was that those who damned me didn’t, as a rule, refute what I had written; they were merely angry that a Jew had written the piece.  They accused me of lending aid and comfort to bigots.

Because I make it a rule to write back to anyone who writes me, and because I assume that those who took the time and trouble to write were representative of many more who didn’t, I’d like to share some of my responses.

The term that nearly every Jew used in condemning me was “a self-hating anti-Semite.”  A few accused me of not really being a Jew.  That didn’t mean they thought I was a Catholic or a Baptist flying under false colors; no, they meant that my sole claim to being Jewish was that my ancestors were Jewish.  The fact is, they’re right.

As I have written on other occasions, I am not a religious man.  I do not keep kosher.  I do not help make up the morning minyan at the local synagogue.  I do not even attend High Holiday services.  So what?  I’m Jewish because I say I’m Jewish.  And because, quite frankly, with my face, who would believe me if I bothered to deny it?  Furthermore, most Jews in America are not orthodox and can not read Hebrew or even speak Yiddish.  For the most part, American Jews are circumcised, have a bar mitzvah, attend a reformed or conservative temple twice a year, and vote the straight Democratic ticket.

Also, I say I’m Jewish because I don’t wish to offend the memory of my parents  by denying their religion and the religion of their parents.

Finally, I say I’m Jewish because Hitler would have said I was Jewish, and then sent me off to Auschwitz, if I hadn’t been fortunate enough to have been born in America.

That was my whole point.  I was lucky to have been born to a Jewish family in a Christian nation.  It was, in the main, Christian soldiers who liberated the Nazi death camps.  Even if I’m not as Jewish as some of my critics would like, I still believe it behooves us to be openly grateful to our Christian neighbors — not because we fear future pogroms — but because it’s the decent thing to do.

One of the very few points for which I was specifically taken to task was for referring to America as a Christian nation.  To those people, I pointed out that I wasn’t claiming this nation is a theocracy, but Christians of one denomination or another compose nearly 90% of America’s population.  That is 10% higher than the percentage of Jews in Israel, but I am willing to wager that none of my critics would deny that Israel is a Jewish state.

The sad fact is that the ACLU is made up in good part of Jews, and it is that organization and its lawyers who are leading the assault against Christmas.  What makes it particularly unfortunate is that most Jews are not only opposed to the policies of the ACLU, but are embarrassed by and ashamed of the organization.  However, when every ACLU lawyer who appears on TV to announce the latest attempt to remove Christian symbols and traditions from America seems to be Jewish, and when it’s a rabbi in Seattle who threatens a lawsuit if a menorah doesn’t take its place among the airport’s Christmas trees, it’s all too easy for Christians to assume the rest of us support this obnoxious campaign.

As one of my respondents put it, “An anti-Semite used to be someone who hated Jews, but it’s become someone whom Jews hate.”  The problem with that truism is that Jews, in the great majority, don’t hate gentiles.  Sometimes it just seems that way.  In fact, most of us are well aware that Israel has no more devoted allies in the world than America’s most devout Christians.  What’s more, the reason that atheists and agnostics are able to wage their anti-religious crusade is because they can safely do so, and the only reason they can is because millions of Christians fought and died to protect this freedom.  Unfortunately, as happens, for instance, when freedom of speech leads to obscenity and pornography, this precious freedom has been corrupted and turned into a license to bully Christians.

Unfortunately, as is so often the case with black Americans, those who are high-profile and get most of the media attention are the knee-jerk radicals and the anything-for-a-buck rabble-rousers.

When my critics accused me of promoting anti-Semitism, I pleaded not guilty.  I asked them if they thought that gentiles were so stupid that, until I wrote my piece, they didn’t recognize that there is a secular jihad underway in this country to remove Christ from Christmas, which, by the way, happens to be a national holiday, unlike Chanukah, Kwanzaa and my birthday.

Finally, the problem is that if Christians complain that a minority is trying to bully the majority, they stand condemned as bigots.  If I, a Jew, suggest that Christians should be free to celebrate one of their holier holidays in any fashion they like, and not have to feel guilty about it, I’m accused of being a self-hating anti-Semite.  In short, nobody is allowed to be critical of Jews.  Well, it so happens that while we Jews may be the Chosen People, that doesn’t make us the perfect people.  And, believe me, I’m not just talking about my relatives.

Many of us, Jews and Christians alike, have been annoyed with American Muslims because they seem to spend an inordinate amount of time whining about racial profiling at the airports, instead of condemning the world-wide butchery of Islamic fascists or passing the hat to place a reward on Osama bin Laden’s head.  Well, to me, the silence of American Jews when it comes to Christian-bashing has been equally deafening.

What truly astonishes me is the patience and good grace with which Christians have dealt with this attack on so many things they hold dear.

It is, I think, a tribute to their religion.

Labels: Culture: Religion, Race & Ethnicity, Multiculturalism

BurtPrelutsky@aol.com
Visit their website at: http://www.burtprelutsky.com/

Read more articles by Burt Prelutsky on IntellectualConservative.com

 

 

Responses to "The Christmas Grinch Revisited"

  1. Wow! What can I say? Burt knows how to win an argument.
    As for the ACLU, they need to chill. I hope Jesus or Santa
    knocks on their office door and scares the hell out of them. Ha, ha.
    Then again, perhaps we should send them a dwarf in the mail. Ha, ha.
    Honestly, how can you not be happy in December? Jesus is the
    reason for the season, and we all need to share a cold beer.

    Comment by Ben-Peter | December 16, 2006

  2. In the interest of clarity, I thought I should share something I read at http://www.chabad.org in the article "Fight or Light?" Apparently, Rabbi Elazar Bogomilsky and Seattle Port Authority Consultant Mitchell Stein wanted to erect a menorah at Seatac Airport. The officials in charge of such things at the airport didn't seem to want a menorah, and when, after being put off repeatedly by those in charge, the Rabbi suggested legal action, it was the airport's decision to yank the Christmas trees. The airport's decision, not the Rabbi's demand. Rabbi Bogomilsky apparently has nothing against Christmas trees, he just wanted a menorah put up; a request which, I think, is eminently reasonable. Anyway, the full article is available at chabad.org.

    Comment by Lane Russell | December 16, 2006

  3. I will add to this discussion in the following ways. As a Jew who does accept the obligation to observe the commandments, and as one who is fluent in Hebrew, Yiddish, and English, the point that the Jews have in the main, once assimilated, become the legions for the World State Elite is hardly debatable. That there is a kind of conservative return by a small segment of the non-observant Jewish population is also true but it is still insignificant. In the main, religious Jews are conservative and non-religious Jews liberal. The vast majority of American Jews are non-observant.

    There are many possible explanations for the fact that Jews tend to take the lead in World State ideologies, but that is really beside the point. They do.

    The whole Chabad fiasco at the airport represents a problem. The reverse of this is taking place right now in a little village in the New York area where Chabad has a menorah and the Christians want to put up a display and the authorities decided to take down the menorah instead.

    The problem is multi-culturalism. When Chabad began putting up menorahs, it did so on the basis of its leader's (the Lubavitcher Rebbe’s) view in the 1970s and 80s that America was losing the battle to secularism. The Rebbe also supported a moment of silence for prayer in public schools, even though he knew that the Jews of the ACLU and the ADL opposed even that. The Rebbe said publicly many times that this country was blessed because of the faith of the founding Christians and those who followed who had the audacity to inscribe In G-d We Trust on their coinage.

    Today, the problem is not what it was in the 70s and 80s. Today, the problem is that in our multi-cultural Open Society it is not possible for Christians to protect the nation's character. If you put up a tree, you must put up a menora, a Wiccan symbol, a Muslim Jihadist or some such nonsense. We have reduced national existence to what can only be called Indiscrimancy, which means there can be no such thing as a people. In a world full of modern liberal democracies, what you really have is one world state where people might speak different languages but otherwise there would be "convergence."

    Conservative or patriotic Jews today must recognize that the moment America is NOT a Christian nation, the Jews' will be at risk. In a perfect world, the Jews shouldn't have to rely on American Christian's kindnesses but on their own nation-state. But that is not in the cards for now so we have but one real option: protect America's national existence by fighting our liberal brethren every step of the way and the Muslims who would kill us all, Jew and Christian alike, simply.

    Burt: good job!

    Comment by David Yerushalmi | December 18, 2006

  4. "…the ACLU is made up in good part …"

    There is no "good part" of the ACLU.

    Comment by sedonaman | December 18, 2006

  5. The ACLU has been an extreme left organization from its inception. Richard Gid Powers’ “Broken” reports that it was formed to protect the American radicals who wanted to replicate the Bolshevik Revolution here and that it included Communists in its leadership, a practice that continued until 1940.

    As an extreme left organization its purpose is not to perfect traditional constitutional governance in this country but to promote socialism by using our constitutional rights against us. This explains why it is extremely selective in which civil liberties it supports; don’t expect it to uphold the Second, Ninth, Tenth Amendments, or Fourteenth Amendments. In this light, the ACLU’s attack on religion can be seen as a leftist assault on a bulwark against the moral relativism required by socialism.

    The large number of presumably secular Jews in the ACLU can be seen as an effect of disproportional Jewish support for collectivism and socialism. It seems unlikely that the Judaic religion looks upon the objectivization of people and exploitation by collectivist goverance with favor.

    Comment by William Woodford | December 24, 2006

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.