<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: John Edwards, Metrosexual</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2007/07/27/john-edwards-metrosexual/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2007/07/27/john-edwards-metrosexual/</link>
	<description>Conservative and Libertarian Intellectual Philosophy and Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:00:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: felix</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2007/07/27/john-edwards-metrosexual/comment-page-1/#comment-53527</link>
		<dc:creator>felix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 14:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2007/07/27/john-edwards-metrosexual/#comment-53527</guid>
		<description>We really need to pay attention to this threatening phenomenon. If John Edwards continues to take care of his appearance, he may dethrone Ralph Reed, and we wouldn&#039;t want that would we.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We really need to pay attention to this threatening phenomenon. If John Edwards continues to take care of his appearance, he may dethrone Ralph Reed, and we wouldn&#8217;t want that would we.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel Alexander</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2007/07/27/john-edwards-metrosexual/comment-page-1/#comment-53423</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel Alexander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 02:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2007/07/27/john-edwards-metrosexual/#comment-53423</guid>
		<description>Alright, alright. I appreciate Ann Coulter&#039;s wit and humor, but I disagree with the criticism of &quot;men obsessing over their grooming and appearance.&quot; I think it&#039;s about time men cared about their appearances as much as women are required to; there&#039;s nothing more repulsive than a big fat hairy slob. However, paying $450 for a haircut is ridiculous. If Edwards is bringing some respect to the &quot;metrosexual,&quot; then there&#039;s something to be said for that. But you can be a great looking &quot;metrosexual&quot; who shops at Ross and TJ Maxx.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alright, alright. I appreciate Ann Coulter&#8217;s wit and humor, but I disagree with the criticism of &#8220;men obsessing over their grooming and appearance.&#8221; I think it&#8217;s about time men cared about their appearances as much as women are required to; there&#8217;s nothing more repulsive than a big fat hairy slob. However, paying $450 for a haircut is ridiculous. If Edwards is bringing some respect to the &#8220;metrosexual,&#8221; then there&#8217;s something to be said for that. But you can be a great looking &#8220;metrosexual&#8221; who shops at Ross and TJ Maxx.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tsmetro</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2007/07/27/john-edwards-metrosexual/comment-page-1/#comment-53392</link>
		<dc:creator>tsmetro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 19:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2007/07/27/john-edwards-metrosexual/#comment-53392</guid>
		<description>Ann Coulter is more woman than John Edwards could ever hope to be and more man than John Edwards was ever born to be.
John Edwards should just open a hair salon and fade away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ann Coulter is more woman than John Edwards could ever hope to be and more man than John Edwards was ever born to be.<br />
John Edwards should just open a hair salon and fade away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Mulligan</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2007/07/27/john-edwards-metrosexual/comment-page-1/#comment-53363</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Mulligan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 14:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2007/07/27/john-edwards-metrosexual/#comment-53363</guid>
		<description>To be fair, Ann Coulter never &quot;called&quot; John Edwards a faggot. At least not in the sense that the word &quot;called&quot; implies. She did not say &quot;John Edwards is a faggot&quot;. She said she couldn&#039;t comment about his election campaign &quot;because you have to go to rehab if you use the word &#039;faggot&#039;&quot;, a reference to the then-current situation in which actor Isaiah Washington entered anger management classes after using the word &quot;faggot&quot; during a fight with a fellow straight man on the set of the TV show &quot;Grey&#039;s Anatomy&quot;. A gay cast member was offended and subsequently came out of the closet over the &quot;incident&quot;. It was really quite amusing in context. Heck, even out of context...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be fair, Ann Coulter never &#8220;called&#8221; John Edwards a faggot. At least not in the sense that the word &#8220;called&#8221; implies. She did not say &#8220;John Edwards is a faggot&#8221;. She said she couldn&#8217;t comment about his election campaign &#8220;because you have to go to rehab if you use the word &#8216;faggot&#8217;&#8221;, a reference to the then-current situation in which actor Isaiah Washington entered anger management classes after using the word &#8220;faggot&#8221; during a fight with a fellow straight man on the set of the TV show &#8220;Grey&#8217;s Anatomy&#8221;. A gay cast member was offended and subsequently came out of the closet over the &#8220;incident&#8221;. It was really quite amusing in context. Heck, even out of context&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

