Misandry in the Least Likely of Places

Estrogen is more spiritualThe problem of misandry has reached the point of commanding scholarly attention.

Dial up your local Country and Western station and you may soon find your fingers tapping out the beat of Carrie Underwood’s latest hit, Before He Cheats. Underwood suspects her boyfriend is probably cheating on her (in matters of infidelity, I guess “probably” is proof enough).

This is how she extracts her revenge:

I dug my key into the side
of his pretty little souped-up four-wheel drive,
Carved my name into his leather seats . . .

I took a Louisville slugger to both headlights,
slashed a hole in all four tires . . .

Trashing your boyfriend’s car has little to do with sugar and spice and everything nice. But it’s the title — Before He Cheats – that turns this song into a bitter gender tirade. Just imagine a male star reaching platinum for crooning, Before She Aborts.

For years women’s libbers have reviled misogynist societies that disrespect women. And they have a point. But why haven’t we given equal consideration to the other side of the coin – persons who evince contempt and disdain for men – and then pretend it’s a joke?

The problem of misandry has reached the point of commanding scholarly attention. McGill University professors Paul Nathanson and Katherine Young have published two books that reveal male-bashing has become commonplace.

Their first book, Spreading Misandry: The Teaching of Contempt for Men in Popular Culture, examines books, TV shows, movies, greeting cards, commercials, and even comic strips.

Remember Steven Spielberg’s acclaimed movie, The Color Purple? When the movie didn’t win an Academy Award, critics cried “racism!” But how many people objected to, or even noticed the fact that all the male characters were depicted as stupid buffoons or evil tyrants?

Thoroughly documented and persuasively argued, Spreading Misandry sardonically concludes that “men are society’s official scapegoats and [should be] held responsible for all evil, including that done by the women they have deluded or intimidated.”

Last year Nathanson and Young released their second book, Legalizing Misandry: From Public Shame to Systematic Discrimination Against Men. Even bolder than their first treatment, they reveal how ideological feminists capitalize on contempt for men to reshape the law in the areas of employment, marriage, divorce, custody, sexual harassment, violence, and human rights.

It’s one thing to peruse a scholarly analysis of gender contempt. It’s quite another to experience it up close and personal, like a bare-knuckled fist shoved into the gut.

That happened last week. I came across an article that announced, “The Spirituality of Moms Outpaces that of Dads.” Based on research by a California-based new-age outfit called The Barna Group, the article purports to show that compared to women, men are spiritual dwarves.

That’s right, a couple hundred years ago we were debating whether American Indians had souls. Now, it seems the spirituality of men is being called into question.

Over the last decade, we’ve watched as our churches have fallen captive to female bonding rituals, Aphrodite worship, and revisionist versions of the Ten Commandments that begin, “Adore me, the Mother. Know that I, the Mother, am immanent and transcendent.”

I’ve seen this with my own eyes, and worse.

And no surprise, men are leaving the church in droves. And now along comes the Barna Group that pompously informs us that, “Men generally lag behind the spirituality of women.” Want proof? Because in a typical week, “mothers are more likely than fathers to attend church.”

Girls, how’s that for a plan – we’ll feminize the church, send the men packing, and then proclaim our moral superiority!

So Gents, switch off the mute button while I indulge in a few moments of unedited indignation. (Ladies, you’re welcome to come along for the ride.)

When you were young and a schoolyard bully insulted your courage and strength, did you turn tail and hide behind your teacher’s skirts? Presumably you confronted the tormenter and told him to lay off, in no uncertain terms – right?

Then why are you allowing ideological bullies who spout feminist mantras to kick you around? Why do you shrug your shoulders when a California guru who purports to “facilitate the spiritual transformation of America” does a shame and blame number on you?

So send an e-mail to director George Barna at tgorka@barna.org. Or call him at 805-658-8885. Get it off your chest. Do it today. (Ladies, you’re welcome to protest this moral hubris, as well.)

I guarantee you’ll recapture some of that warrior spirit. And before long we’ll turn around this torrent of misandry.

Share

4 comments to Misandry in the Least Likely of Places

  • LiveFreeDieFree

    Carey,

    Sending Emails to California New-Age groups is almost quintessentially an exercise in futility. After all, the ethos of New-Agers is feminine. In their usage, ‘spirituality’ means deathless ingenue-ity.

    There are other more winnable battles; for example, being ultra-gracious to women at Costco. The rippling effect of a smile or a “Please, you go first” is a finger in the eye to misandry.

  • William Woodford

    The notion that a gender that includes Hillary is spiritually and morally superior to Y-chromosomed-Americans is absurd as Hillary’s claim to be a “moral Methodist,” despite the fact that she is America’s foremost leftist and is unrepentant for supporting the Communist victory in Indochina and thus making the Cambodian Genocide possible. In addition, the discipline of the Methodist Church holds that exploitation and objectification of people are among the worst sins, which makes Big Government immoral in terms of traditional morality. What we are seeing is not real religion but the heresy known as the Religious Left. Real religion serves as a bulwark against moral relativism; the Religious Left heresy enables moral relativism. I have strong suspicions that women’s desire for security makes them intrinsically susceptible to socialism. This is born out by John Lott’s observation in “Freedomnomics” that women’s suffrage leads to Big Government. Given that the Bill of Rights in the U.S. Constitution has two amendments to thwart socialism–the Ninth and Tenth–women’s suffrage has opened the path to a Socialist Amerika. The whole thing is enough to make one wonder if the wisdom of the ancient Greeks inscribed on the wall of the temple of Apollo at Delphi is correct–Keep woman under rule

  • sedonaman

    “…why are you allowing ideological bullies who spout feminist mantras to kick you around?”
    Perhaps I can suggest an answer to this question with a couple of Q&As.
    Q: What is the legal term for a man’s peaking into a woman’s bathroom window and seeing her naked? A: Voyeurism.
    Q: What is the legal term for a woman’s peaking into a man’s bathroom window and seeing him naked? A: Indecent exposure.

  • 57chevypreterist

    “…California-based new-age outfit called The Barna Group…”

    Perhaps this was tongue-in-cheek, But it is my understanding that Barna is a solid Christian, not a New-Ager.

    http://www.barna.org/FlexPage.aspx?Page=AboutBarna

Leave a Reply

IC Writers

Articles Archived by Topic