<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Newark Triple Homicides: Why Prop 100 and Bail Reform Matters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2007/08/24/the-newark-triple-homicides-why-prop-100-and-bail-reform-matters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2007/08/24/the-newark-triple-homicides-why-prop-100-and-bail-reform-matters/</link>
	<description>Conservative and Libertarian Intellectual Philosophy and Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:00:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mickey G</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2007/08/24/the-newark-triple-homicides-why-prop-100-and-bail-reform-matters/comment-page-1/#comment-54238</link>
		<dc:creator>Mickey G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 15:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2007/08/24/the-newark-triple-homicides-why-prop-100-and-bail-reform-matters/#comment-54238</guid>
		<description>Arizona had its problems with judges interpreting the law they wished had been enacted rather than the one that had so that they could let illegals out!

Get rid of those pandering to illegals take the pledge:

I will vote, and actively work for the election of, the opponent of any elected official supporting any form of legislation, resolution, proclamation, or action offering illegal aliens:
1.	sanctuary, 
2.	taxpayer funded benefits, 
3.	anchor baby citizenship, 
4.	police no ask policy, 
5.	day worker centers, 
6.	legal services, 
7.	chain migration, 
8.	amnesty. 

UNLESS their opponent also supported the legislation, resolution, proclamation, or action. 

THEN I will vote for a write-in candidate.

I also will not contribute to their campaign AND I will return their campaign material marked as REFUSED RETURN TO SENDER.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arizona had its problems with judges interpreting the law they wished had been enacted rather than the one that had so that they could let illegals out!</p>
<p>Get rid of those pandering to illegals take the pledge:</p>
<p>I will vote, and actively work for the election of, the opponent of any elected official supporting any form of legislation, resolution, proclamation, or action offering illegal aliens:<br />
1.	sanctuary,<br />
2.	taxpayer funded benefits,<br />
3.	anchor baby citizenship,<br />
4.	police no ask policy,<br />
5.	day worker centers,<br />
6.	legal services,<br />
7.	chain migration,<br />
8.	amnesty. </p>
<p>UNLESS their opponent also supported the legislation, resolution, proclamation, or action. </p>
<p>THEN I will vote for a write-in candidate.</p>
<p>I also will not contribute to their campaign AND I will return their campaign material marked as REFUSED RETURN TO SENDER.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

