September 27th, 2007

Why Illegal Immigration is a Threat to the United States…And How Local Communities are Fighting Back

 by Tom DeWeese  
| View comments | Print This Post Print This Post

 If a community opens its arms to illegal aliens, of course they flock there. If a community stands up to them, they leave.

In June, 2007 a solid eighty percent of the American people let Congress know they wanted the government to put the brakes on illegal immigration; they turned thumbs down on the President's guest worker amnesty plan; and they wanted tax-paid services to illegals stopped.

Most Americans understand that new laws are not needed to stop illegal immigration. What is necessary is repeal of some laws granting taxpayer-financed services to illegals along with enforcement of existing laws. These two acts would be enough to stop the migration. In simple fact, they are called "illegal" because they are breaking the law.

In truth, the battle over the Senate's guest worker-amnesty plan is really a battle over attempts to open the border as called for in programs such as the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP). Both plans call for open borders and economic integration of North America. Open borders are required to fully implement the plans.

The Bush Administration and those promoting illegal immigration were frankly stunned at the force and determination of U.S. citizens to reject the Senate's immigration plan. Proponents played a very heavy hand in attempting to force the scheme on a resisting citizenry. Such powerful forces are not used to losing. Today they continue to seek new ways to work around the opposition and pass the legislation, as a whole or incrementally.

However, the anti-illegal fervor refuses to abate and in fact, dramatic new developments are taking place in local communities across the nation that may well stop the unpopular Federal schemes.

Meanwhile, in an attempt to weaken the resolve of opponents, they are called fringe fanatics. A common tactic employed by immigration proponents is to accuse opponents of racism. They charge that opponents want to deny a new breed of immigrant the chance to become Americans as many of our immigrant forefathers did. They paint a Norman Rockwell-type picture of honest, hard-working immigrants, planting gardens, working in fields, doing the work "no Americans want to do."

So, in town after town across the nation the battle rages. And that is really the point. Illegal immigration is not just a border issue. It is a national issue affecting every large city and almost every small town. It must be understood that illegal immigration is not just a matter of some unhappy peasants hoping to seek a better life. It is a $300 billion a year industry, combining the interests of multinational corporations with those of drug cartels and Latino street gangs. Caught in between are American communities and the American way of life. Some cities, especially those along the points of entry at the border, have become dangerous no-mans lands, where no property is safe, no American citizen is able to leave their home unarmed and some politicians turn a blind eye as they profit under the table. As a result American civilization is beginning to break down. That is why so many Americans refuse to back down on the issue, continuing to demand a crackdown, no matter what name calling they must endure.

The Economic Cost of Illegals

Federal law (the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act) mandates that all hospitals with emergency-room services must treat anyone who shows up – including illegal aliens. In most cities across the nation, illegals now use the emergency rooms as free primary care. And the hospitals have to keep taking them.

Health Care

The annual cost for uncompensated emergency care to Mexican Border States (California, New Mexico, Arizona and Texas) is $200 million. California taxpayers paid $79 million for illegal alien health care. Four major Los Angeles hospitals were bankrupted and shut down in 2004. Texas paid $74 million. Georgia ran a $63 million deficit for 64,000 unpaid doctor visits in 2002. Cochise County, Arizona spent 30% of its annual budget on uncompensated care to illegal aliens. University Medical Care in Tucson, Arizona spent $10 million on uncompensated care to illegal aliens. 77 hospitals in the four Border States now face financial emergencies. Legal citizens are forced to fly emergency patients to other cities for treatment. Taxes are going up to compensate.

Meanwhile, as a result of the Federal Emergency Medical Act, Mexican ambulance drivers are transporting hospital patients unable to pay for medical care in Mexico to facilities in the United States. The ambulances are driving through unguarded potions of the border with "little resistance" at the instruction of Mexican officials.

Education

Federal laws and a Supreme Court decision mandate that schools cannot deny free education to illegal aliens. Over 300,000 pregnant women enter the nation illegally every year. Taxpayers pay for food, housing, medical care and school. The average annual cost per child for education is $7,161, totaling $109 billion to educate illegal aliens annually. The average cost of bilingual education is $1,200 per illegal student. U.S. schools annually educate 1.1 million illegal children. Schools have become over crowded and unruly. Teacher shortages (especially those who speak Spanish) are a growing problem for local school districts.

One teacher has reported what it is like in the classrooms in schools where federal tax dollars pay for free medical, free babysitters for student mothers as young as thirteen, and free breakfasts (where "the waste of food is monumental, with trays and trays of food being dumped in the trash uneaten"), new computers are "carved with graffiti by students." "I have had to intervene several times for young and substitute teachers whose classes consist of many illegal immigrant students here in the country less than three months who raise so much hell with the female teachers, calling them Putas (whores) and throwing things that the teachers were in tears," she reports. Such is the atmosphere in today's schools, where there is no ability to control or discipline illegal aliens who speak no English.

Moreover, state-run colleges and universities are being forced to allow illegal aliens to receive in-state tuition discounts that are supposed to be reserved for residents of that state. In California, a law (Assembly Bill 540) allows undocumented high school graduates who have been in residence for three years to enroll in community colleges and the California State University and University of California systems without paying nonresident tuition. The same is true in many other states across the country.

The Jobs Americans Don't Want

In 2003, illegal aliens displaced American workers at a cost in excess of $133 billion, while American college and high school students can't find summer jobs in yard care, landscape, fast food or service jobs – because illegal aliens work those jobs at a third of the wage – often under the table.

Crime

Crimes committed by alien criminals, such as rape, murder or drug distribution, cost U.S. taxpayers $1.6 billion in prison costs alone. The figure doesn't include the cost of lost property, medical bills of the victims, time lost from work to recover, higher insurance costs, etc. Today, illegal aliens make up twenty-nine percent of the U.S. prison population – or 500,000 illegals.

Latino gangs like Mara Salvatrucha 13 (MS13) constitute most of the crime from the ranks of the illegals. They originated in El Salvador and today their U.S. leadership still comes from there. They steal cars and use them to run drugs over the border. They terrorize local citizens with violence. They are the chief source of drug sales for the cartels. And they are racists.

MS13 is the largest and most violent of all gangs in the US today. They have overtaken the Crips and the Bloods both in size and violence. MS13, which began its operations in Los Angeles, has now moved east and is prominent on the East Coast.

In Los Angeles, Mexican gangs declared "ethnic cleansing zones" in specific parts of the city. They kill whites and blacks. In New Jersey, recently, MS13 gang members killed three college students in execution style.

No Man's Land at the Border

No legal citizen of the United States of America, living under the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, should have to live as those who reside near the U.S./Mexican border. Here there are no property rights, no ability to be safe in their homes, and no peace. One dare not go to the movies, the grocery or visit a relative without carrying a weapon for protection. Throughout the community the streets are teaming with drug dealers, loiterers and gangs bent on violence.

The illegals flood across their property having just crossed the border. As they pass over the ranches and private property they leave a trail of trash, human waste and dead farm animals and pets. Found in the trash that is dropped all along the trail are pieces of paper containing contact phone numbers. Also found are Korans dropped by obvious Muslims who have made their way across the border.

Sometimes the illegals walk right into the living rooms and steal what they want. Many homes on the border are now little more than prisons for the residents, surrounded by barbed wire, searchlights, with loaded guns at the ready.

The Tucson, Arizona area is one of the prime crossing points for illegals. The organization for transporting illegals is almost a precision military operation. On the Mexican side of the border is a landing strip where planes land on a regular basis with their cargo. Some of it human; some drugs. It's all the same to those providing the transportation.

The planes land and the cargo is loaded onto busses with the windows whited out. Young girls prepare for the trip by taking birth control, for they know what awaits them on the trip across the border from their "travel assistants" – rape. It's just part of the price for crossing the border into the promised land of America.

The busses drive to a specific location on the border. Here the cargo is unloaded and the process of walking across the border begins. Each of the human cargo is given information on what to do once they reach the other side, including a phone number of someone to call. The number is not necessarily a local number. It may be a location in Virginia, or Maine or Utah. Anywhere in the U.S. The person on the other end gives instructions on how to gain transportation to their location where they will be brought into the illegal community in that city.

And so the journey across the border begins. Somewhere in the middle, between Mexico and the U.S., is a tree. From the branches of that tree hang women's panties. It's called the panty tree. Why? Trophies from the raped women of previous journeys. It's just the cost of doing business with the "Coyotes," the murderous thugs who run the illegal immigrant trade. They don't care who lives or dies. These are the ones who will leave illegals locked in trucks without food or water or ventilation. They charge enormous fees – up front. To them the cargo is all the same. They carry the drugs with the humans. They make deals with terrorists for the same trip. They rape, maim and kill. And go back for another load. Business is booming.

Once the cargo is inside the U.S., more busses are there to pick them up and transport them to dropoff points. Here the phone calls are made for arrangements of more transportation across the nation. And in that highly organized manner, illegal aliens make their way into American cities.

Some are "Sanctuary Cities," where politicians have decided it's good for the community to encourage illegals to live. In such communities no one can ask for the country of origin, even if a crime as horrible as murder is committed. The sanctuaries permit 20 million illegals, drug smugglers, child sex rings, ID forgery networks, and an assortment of run of the mill criminals to live lawlessly inside the United States. They are provided with income, identification, driver's licenses, credit, housing, education, and medical care at taxpayer expense.

As stated, it's a $300 billion a year industry. That buys a lot of politicians. Along the Border States no one talks about it. And, no surprise, a lot of politicians do nothing to stop it. Our fear and their greed are destroying the American dream.

Meanwhile in your Local Community…

How a community treats the illegals is key as to how many come there. The main magnet is the establishment of a day labor center. The nation-wide illegal network knows where to send them. If a community opens its arms, of course they flock there. If a community stands up to them, they leave.

But that is easier said than done. First, federal laws or lack of enforcement hampers efforts against the illegals, no matter the sentiment of the community. Federal courts strike down local laws, such as just happened in Hazleton, Pennsylvania, when a federal judge degreed that laws the community had passed to crack down on illegals were unconstitutional. Federal agencies say it is illegal for local police to ask if anyone is an illegal. The federal government argues that immigration is a federal issue and for local communities to take action interferes with U.S. foreign policy.

On the local level, too, there is great pressure on elected officials to do nothing. Strong lobbying arms protect the illegals. The ACLU, of course, threatens lawsuits. But many Americans would be surprised to learn of the Hispanic forces behind much of the pressure applied to their local officials.

Many immigrant groups are joined together through the La Raza movement. These are the groups which organized the massive demonstrations in cities across the nation last year. It is past time for all Americans to know what is at the root of those demonstrations and the extent to which our nation is at risk to the La Raza movement.

One of the most prominent Hispanic organizations pushing for "immigrant rights" is the National Council of La Raza – the Council of "the Race." The mainstream media and most members of Congress depict La Raza as little more than a Hispanic Rotary Club. In 2005, La Raza received $15.2 million in federal grants, of which $7.9 million was in U.S. Department of Education grants for Charter Schools, and undisclosed amounts to get-out-the-vote efforts supporting La Raza political positions including lobbying for open borders and amnesty for illegals. Had the Senate's immigration bill passed, several million more dollars were budgeted for La Raza.

Behind the respectable front of the National Council of La Raza lies the real agenda of the La Raza movement. This radical agenda, pushed by secondary groups, contains the reasons behind the demonstrations and the strong lobbying efforts in our communities.

Key among those secondary groups is the radical racist group Movimiento Estudiantil Chicano de Aztlan, or Chicano Student Movement of Astlan (MEChA). MEChA seeks to carve a racist nation out of the American West. MEChA opposes assimilation into American society. MEChA is a leader in the effort to "Reconquista" or reconquest our western states. MEChA's founding principles state:


In the spirit of a new people that is conscious not only of its proud historical heritage but also of the brutal gringo invasion of our territories, we, the Chicano inhabitants and civilizers of the northern land of Aztlan from whence came our forefathers, reclaiming the land of their birth and consecrating the determination of our people of the sun, declare that the call of our blood is our power, our responsibility, and our inevitable destiny . . . Aztlan belongs to those who plant the seeds, water the fields, and gather the crops and not to the foreign Europeans . . . For La Raza to do. Fuera de la Raza nada.

That closing two-sentence motto is chilling to everyone who values equal rights for all. It says: "For The Race everything. Outside The Race, nothing."

These words don't come from a fringe radical element. They come straight from the official MEChA sites at Georgetown University, the University of Texas, UCLA, University of Michigan, University of Oregon, and many other colleges and universities around the country.

Another leading Hispanic group involved in community organization, promoting the pro-illegal position, is Mexicanos Sin Fronteras. The translation of the name means "Mexicans Without Borders." This group is active throughout the country and many times works with the "Zapatista Army of National Liberation." These groups seek to radicalize the Latino community. The official website of the Mexicanos Sin Fronteras states that it is "anti-capitalist, anti-imperialist in the capital of the most terrorist country of world-wide history" (Washington, DC). It goes on to say it pledges its support to "other campaigns" of the radical illegal Hispanics with material and financial assistance.

In Manassas, Virginia the Mexicanos Sin Fronteras and the Zapatista Army of National Liberation are the two most prominent "pro-Hispanic" voices. In fact, these two groups are spearheading the illegal alien lobby in Prince William County, where Manassas is located. This is the "mainstream opposition" to efforts to curb illegal immigration in that community. Together, these groups are holding rallies and calling for boycotts and even the violent overthrow of the United States. Again, these groups are not fringe radicals. They are the most prominent voices for the illegals. In fact, in Prince William County, there are several candidates running for local office as well as the state legislature who are closely aligned with these two radical organizations.

Fighting Back

While Congress fiddles and the Bush Administration issues meaningless pronouncements on "get tough" programs it never intends to enforce, local communities and state legislatures are beginning to fight back. And they are meeting with success.

State Legislatures, forced to deal with the failure of the federal government to fix the immigration laws, have considered 1,404 immigration bills this year and enacted 170 of them. These laws are aimed at curbing employment of illegals and making it more difficult to obtain state identification documents like driver's licenses.

In May, Oklahoma passed the "Taxpayer and Citizen protection Act," which denies illegals state identification, and requires all state and local agencies to verify citizenship status of all applicants before authorizing benefits.

On the local level incredible success is being achieved in Northern Virginia. Last year two residents of Herndon, Virginia, with no prior political experience, began an effort called Save Herndon. The issue was the establishment of a day labor center in the community. The center would give illegals a gathering place in the community to help them get jobs, identification and benefits from the community.

The two began a campaign that at once made a major issue out of the establishment of the center. When the mayor and the city council moved forward and voted to establish the center over the objections of a majority of the citizens, Save Herndon began a campaign to assure these representatives were not re-elected. They succeeded beyond their wildest expectations, helping to out the mayor and everyone on the city council who voted for the center.

Now the movement is growing across the Northern Virginia area. There is now Help Save Manassas, Help Save Loudoun (County), Help Save Fairfax, Help Save Virginia and Help Save Maryland. Together these purely grassroots movements have succeeded in enacting legislation in Loudoun County (the nation's fastest growing county) and in its neighbor, Prince William County, which stops county taxpayer services to illegals. Incredibly, under challenge from federal and state officials, the members of county commissioners are holding tough behind the laws.

The key, as stated earlier, is the day labor centers. If your city has one, then the message has gone out to the illegal infrastructure that your community welcomes them. Get rid of it and send the message that they are no longer welcome. If faced with lawsuits from the ACLU and La Raza, welcome them. Tell them you will gladly have a news conference to discuss their suit in front of the cameras. Do not be afraid.

Here are a few guidelines to help organize locally and face the coming onslaught of charges of racism.

DON'T express anger at what is happening to your community. DON'T express annoyance because illegals refuse to assimilate into your community or abide by your customs. DON'T make the issue economic and safety issues, overcrowded housing and commercial vehicle zoning violations, or that specific individuals are illegal aliens.

The pro-illegals will try to tell the public that there is uncertainty as to who is illegal, creating doubt. They will talk about how impossible it is to check everyone's legal status. It will be easy to charge racism.

Instead, make the issues about the abrogation of law. Focus your efforts against the individuals, businesses and politicians who create this problem and cheat honest business owners and workers by allowing illegal hiring practices under the table. In short, make the issue about enforcement of the law, cost and corruption. It's working in Virginia.

Today, we have the chance to not only stop the flood of illegal aliens, but in the process, deflate the size and power of the federal government in the process. It's time to organize Help Save America.

Immigration



Tom DeWeese is publisher and editor of The DeWeese Report and president of the American Policy Center, a grassroots, activist think tank headquartered in Warrenton, VA.
ampolicycenter@hotmail.com
http://www.americanpolicy.org/

Read more articles by Tom DeWeese

Bookmark and Share

  1. In addition to the steps mentioned to deal with the race cards tell all of your elected officials that you have taken the pledge:

    I will vote, and actively work for the election of, the opponent of any elected official supporting any form of legislation, resolution, proclamation, or action offering illegal aliens:

    1. sanctuary,
    2. taxpayer funded benefits,
    3. anchor baby citizenship,
    4. police no ask policy,
    5. day worker centers,
    6. legal services,
    7. chain migration,
    8. amnesty.

    UNLESS their opponent also supported the legislation, resolution, proclamation, or action.

    THEN I will vote for a write-in candidate.
    I also will not contribute to their campaign AND I will return their campaign material marked as REFUSED RETURN TO SENDER

    Comment by Mickey G | September 27, 2007

  2. Good article and the author is correct about life in a border state; a good friend in Arizona keeps a loaded 9 millimeter handy to protect herself and her children. But, I think the motivation for Washington to ignore illegal immigration isn’t a desire to form a new mega-country stretching from the northern tip of Canada to the southern border of Mexico. In fact, the motivation may be for the long term good of all Americans, as that “good” is perceived by our political managers in Washington.

    Mary Ann Glendon, a Harvard law professor, is of the opinion that legal and illegal immigration is the unannounced cure for a skewed American labor force and this skewing is an indirect result, among others, of the 1973 abortion ruling by the Supreme Court. She notes that almost 79 million Americans are poised to enter retirement over the next 25 years. She also notes that social security and Medicare are dependent on a young, healthy labor force paying for the care of our senior citizens. But, this young, healthy labor force didn’t materialize in adequate numbers – abortion and working women were the cause of the shortfall. And, this is not only an America problem but a problem common to Europe and Japan as well.

    For the modern, democratic, nanny state, the vision of crushing tax burdens on working taxpayers to pay for senior citizens is a surefire recipe for disaster. With the rising costs of health care and the expectations of those voters soon to be collecting social security, the cost of providing retirement stipends and health care solely for senior Americans will reach 60% of the federal budget within 23 years – and 20% of our population will be over 65 years old. At that level of consumption, money available for other government programs will be in drastically reduced supply; our present federal debt levels consume billions in interest payments, military defense consumes even more billions, which leaves an empty purse to fund the myriad of non-Social Security federal programs and staff those agencies needed to administer such programs.

    Much of the future yearly retirement income for our senior citizens is expected to come from the private sector; 401-k plans and the dwindling number of corporate and/or local government- sponsored pension plans. But, these private plans are completely dependent on healthy stock and bond markets to generate income. What will happen to these plans if rising federal tax rates and a dwindling domestic labor force cause a long lasting downturn within these very same markets and our national economy? Many citizens contemplating retirement within 10 to 15 years don’t expect social security to provide for all their financial needs. But, how many among them have contemplated an economic downturn that could severely impact their 401-k savings or their promised pension income? And what will be their reaction should that happen – it’s not unreasonable to expect them to blame the government for not preventing the problem. The combined anger of the electorate will fall directly on Washington should this scenario unfold and it’s hard to see why it shouldn’t unfold as Glendon describes.

    There is an old adage: Political managers do politics and the public has politics done to them. Consequently, our small, elite group of political managers in Washington face a gloomy future if we successfully prohibit or radically reduce immigration. And, these political managers aren’t ignorant of the financial and demographic projections and certainly can’t remain optimistic if they have thoroughly grasped the implications. Such a realization may explain their reluctance to deal with immigration issues. Their choices are to enforce the law, reduce immigration and face the demise of the welfare state Washington has worked so hard to create – or “unofficially” encourage immigration to replace the missing workers and preserve the status quo.

    It’s cold comfort to our political managers that a dwindling population of native born American citizens may eventually reach an equilibrium point of older versus younger members. With a proper equilibrium, the younger citizens could support a population of older citizens needing health care and those government sponsored welfare payments currently referred to as Social Security. But, planning for such a future equilibrium isn’t helpful – the welfare state is in peril now (or soon will be); the desired state of equilibrium may not be reached for decades, if ever. Facing the cold hard facts, Washington has no choice but to encourage mass immigration, with periodic amnesties to reassure the illegal immigrants.

    The author is also correct that illegal immigrants actually increase government costs. But at what level are the cost increases notable? Aren’t local governments and communities most directly affected? Increases in education costs, local medical care costs, local law enforcement and prison expenses are the current price we pay for illegal immigration. For Washington however, these increased costs are problems for local politicians and their constituents. The long term survival of our federal government welfare programs and the self-interest of the political managers who direct and benefit from their existence is a looming problem of gigantic proportions – but, for the present, it’s an unrealized problem.

    Fighting back at the local level is “winning the battle but losing the war”. We need to face the reality that we must abandon our unique American heritage to become a pluralistic nation and a polyglot culture that can support its senior citizens and a massive Washington government apparatus. Or, we can oppose continued waves of immigrants with courage and the conviction that alternate answers will be found and satisfactory solutions created. But, if we continue to have politics done to us, we can be sure our Washington political managers will opt for the polyglot society – and the continued existence of their beloved programs and jobs.

    Comment by Pat Skurka | September 27, 2007

  3. Mary Ann Glendon is an economic ignoramus. Admitting poorly paid Mexicans to social security will only make SS more insolvent. Think about the way SS benefits are calculated. Take a look at George Borjas blog. The SS benefit of admitting Mexicans is just a rationalization. Madame Glendon does not understand actuarial concepts if she thinks the illegals will be a net economic benefit to the US.

    Comment by TexasGeorge200 | September 27, 2007

  4. Texas George is correct and it is easy to model. Go to the SS site and review the benefit formula. Then calculate the value to the system of millions of minimum contribution workers who get much more out of the system than they contribute. The system has gotten so welfare skewed that those paying maximum social security will never recover their payments much less a return on those payments while the low earners continue to suck on the public teat drawing much more than contributed. SS is welfare plain and simple. Why not privatize? Because then the politicians have no one to steal from to give higher benefits to the unwashed masses.

    Comment by Mickey G | September 28, 2007

  5. TexasGeorge/Mickey G – What Glendon was arguing has nothing to do with how individual benefits are calculated by Social Security. Her argument examined the relative proportions between those retired and receiving benefits and those working to support those receiving benefits. In short, today’s baby-boomers were the product of post-WWII couples who had more kids on average than couples do nowadays. Since 1973, there have been approximately 35 million or so abortions of potential native born Americans. Running consistently about a million a year, there will be another 25 million by 2032 or 60 million aborted Americans who won’t be supporting retirees when a full 20% of our population is over 65 (given current projections). The United States everywhere in the year 2030 will resemble the demographics of the state of Florida (a favorite retirement state) as it is now.

    Additionally, average family size and number of kids per family surviving to maturity has decreased as women have sought “personal fulfillment” in careers or entered the labor market seeking full-time continuous employment to realize a higher family income. Overall, there is a population bulge reaching retirement age that will overturn the initial workers-to-retirees ratio concept of social security. In Europe and Japan as well, the desirable ratio of working citizens to retired citizens was 10 to 15 to 1 – but that initial ratio hasn’t held steady (America in the year 1950, the ratio was 16 workers to 1 retiree). In recent decades, that ratio has fallen drastically to 3 to 4 to 1 – and it continues to fall. Per the White House information office, the current U.S. ratio is 3.3 workers to 1 retiree. As the Boomers retire starting next year, the ratio will drop below 3 workers within 10 years at the present rate.

    Many kids today don’t become full-time working citizens until their post college years in their early twenties – kids no longer quit school at 16 to help out on the farm. So, younger citizens reach working age later on average and only then begin to earn those taxable wages that lead to larger social security contributions. Pressing on the problem from the opposite end, first world medical care has extended life spans of retirees and such care can become very expensive to taxpayers when older citizens are stricken with the usual infirmities and problems of age.

    Next look at the social security system and Medicare economics. The OASDI Trust Fund is poorer than a crack addict on welfare. Employee payroll deductions and employer matching contributions go directly to the Treasury Department’s general fund. Treasury issues a form of IOU to Social Security for the money collected, but no dollars are remitted to Social Security at any time. Nor does Social Security invest your contributions in stocks or bonds, nor are your payroll taxes being held securely in Fort Knox awaiting your eventual retirement. Social Security Administration merely does the bookkeeping of how much each participant contributed.

    In short, current social security payments are paid out of current tax revenues – period, end of story. There is no separate, protected fund and no massive surplus to pay you, me or the cable repairman. Regardless of how you calculate the individual benefits, the money isn’t there now and it won’t be in the future. A change long ago in the law allowed Washington to “borrow” Social Security’s fiscal assets for “earmarks”, “pork”, you name it, but the end result is that the trust fund money was spent. And yes, Social Security is like a ponzi scheme, albeit a legal one, whereby you, me and the other guy pay for the old geezers now and hope that younger folks will pay for us when we retire – in short, a pyramid scheme with the same basic flaw as all pyramid schemes, legal or otherwise.

    Nor was Glendon arguing that we should condone illegal immigration – she merely indicated that Washington politicians have good reasons for favoring any form of immigration, legal or illegal, to replace the aborted taxpayers. You see, immigrants are generally younger, working age folks who have children presently or will do so in the future. Unless you know where we can find an additional 60 million native born Americans, what objection do you have with her math or logic? You might also review President Bush’s related comments in his 2006 State of the Union address – apparently he’s worried about the problem as well.

    Looking at illegal immigrants, you have to notice the fact that working-age adults make the illegal border crossing – we’re not seeing an immediate mass migration of entire families – including great-grandma and the baby. If your argument is that these illegals aren’t paying their full share of taxes – you’re absolutely right – they probably don’t. But, our economy is absorbing about 300,000 immigrant workers per year – a sign the economy is very healthy, for now.

    Glendon may be an “economic ignoramus”, but she’s also a respected legal scholar, a highly intelligent woman and someone who has been studying the relation between law and the sociology of the American family for decades. I’m sure other commentators have declared there is no linkage between social security and immigration – and there are those gullible citizens who believe that. However, there is no way to “fix” Social Security short of finding more workers to support future retirees. “Personal Retirement Accounts” or any other bookkeeping gimmicks won’t do it – see the worker/retiree ratios above.

    I don’t know Glendon’s personal opinion on immigration, but I’d like us to fix the problem we Americans created without opening our borders to periodic and massive waves of immigrants. But, it’s hard to be optimistic we will find solutions. As our aging boomers, the Worst Generation, reach retirement, I suspect the same complaints over “our rights” and “our entitlements” will occur. A significant portion of that generation who entered adulthood whining about how unfair the draft and the Vietnam war was will exit this world whining about how unfairly they were treated during retirement.

    Comment by Pat Skurka | September 29, 2007

  6. Begin HERE:

    The Welfare State and How It’s Destroying the West

    http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2007/09/29/the-welfare-state-and-how-it’s-destroying-the-west

    Comment by becket m. saunders | September 30, 2007

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.





Latest Articles

Christopher Hitchens and His Critics: Terror, Iraq and the Left
 by Nathan Alexander
Is the Presidency above Obama’s Pay Grade?
 by Selwyn Duke
American Papists
 by Lisa Fabrizio
Will Denver Archbishop finally enforce Canon 915?
 by Barbara Kralis
Obama/Biden: Escalating the War on Fathers and Families
 by Gordon E. Finley
A Case for McCain – Palin
 by Steven D. Laib
Duly Noted
 by George de Poor Handlery
Absurdistan Weekend Update #9: From Big-Foot to Flat-footed
 by Bob Stapler
Thomas Paine and the Values of 1776
 by Thomas E. Brewton



Book Reviews



Features




         Top 25