Rush Limbaugh is Unpatriotic
View Comments | Print This Post Print This Post |

by Daniel Clark | October 18th, 2007

Harry Reid said it, it must be true.

During the phony controversy over Rush Limbaugh's calling phony soldiers "phony soldiers," it went almost unnoticed that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid called Limbaugh "unpatriotic." If the Democrats' own rhetoric is to be believed, that remark should have been universally met with shock and condemnation. That's because, since the start of the war, conservatives have accepted the premise that it's always wrong to question someone's patriotism.

For the past five years, it's been as if the concept of patriotism doesn't even exist. Democrats have been free to slander our soldiers with impunity, not having to pay for it even with their reputations, because the Jellyphants across the aisle have lacked the fortitude to confront them over it. Even Limbaugh has bought into the "I'm not questioning your patriotism, I'm questioning your judgment" line.

To say that we're only questioning the Democrats' judgment means we're giving them the benefit of the doubt that they at least mean well. Lots of conservatives question Senator John McCain's judgment, but would never dream of questioning his patriotism. Senators Reid, Durbin, Kennedy, et al, do not deserve that same deference. Anyone who's been paying attention knows that congressional Democrats don't share America's interests; but pretending they do has become ingrained in the decorum of public debate, in much the same way that a congressman fibs when he addresses a colleague as "my friend, the distinguished gentleman from Massachusetts."

Now, the Democrats have decided that questioning somebody's patriotism is fair game. So, let's question away. Was it patriotic of Senator Dick Durbin to compare our guards at Guantanamo Bay to Nazis? Or of Senator John Kerry to accuse our soldiers of terrorizing Iraqi women and children in the dead of night? How about Congressman John Murtha's condemning our Marines as cold-blooded murderers? Or Senator Ted Kennedy's likening the invasion of Iraq to Pearl Harbor? Senator Reid himself tried to short-circuit "the surge" by publicly declaring Iraq to be "lost." Is that the act of a patriot? Such questions abound.

It's one thing to disagree with the approach to a particular part of the War on Terror, but the Democrats object to every action that is taken in our defense. They don't want us to imprison the enemy. They don't want us to interrogate the enemy. They don't want us to spy on the enemy. They say they want to treat terrorism as a domestic law enforcement issue, but they obstruct us from doing even that, as Senator Reid illustrated when he prematurely boasted that he'd "killed the Patriot Act."

To call somebody "phony" is pretty mild stuff compared to what these leading Democrats have said. The controversy lies in the fact that the Democrats identify with the object of this criticism. Limbaugh is calling out phony soldier Jessie Macbeth, and others who have slandered our soldiers by accusing them of committing fictitious atrocities. To the Democrats, people like Macbeth and New Republic "Baghdad Diarist" Scott Thomas Beauchamp are just the latest incarnations of Vietnam-era phonies like John Kerry.

It was Kerry who, in 1971, falsely testified that his fellow Vietnam veterans had "personally raped, cut off ears, cut off heads, taped wires from portable telephones to human genitals and turned up the power, cut off limbs, blown up bodies, randomly shot at civilians, razed villages in a fashion reminiscent of [Genghis] Khan, shot cattle and dogs for fun, poisoned food stocks, and generally ravaged the countryside of South Vietnam." How did he know all this? Because a bunch of impostors had testified to it at the "Winter Soldier Investigation" that had been hosted by his organization, Vietnam Veterans Against the War.

Ironically, Kerry uses his status as a Vietnam veteran to shield himself from his detractors. "I refuse to have my patriotism or right to speak out questioned," he told the Associated Press in 2004. "I fought for and earned the right to express my views in this country." He and his party do not apply this respect for military service to our troops as a whole, though. Nor did they respect the right of the Swift Boat Veterans For Truth to express their views about Senator Kerry. Presumably, they hadn't "earned" it.

As Limbaugh likes to say, "Words mean things." The word "unpatriotic" has a meaning, and it applies to Senator Reid and his fellow Democrats. There's no longer any reason to avoid saying so, according to the new rules, as set by Reid himself.

Labels: Politics: General

Daniel Clark is a Staff Writer for the New Media Alliance. The New Media Alliance is a non-profit (501c3) national coalition of writers, journalists and grass-roots media outlets.
dclark@thenma.org
Visit their website at:

Read more articles by Daniel Clark on IntellectualConservative.com

 

Responses to "Rush Limbaugh is Unpatriotic"

No comments yet.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.







Latest Articles

"Islamo-Fascists" and "White Racists"
 by Jack Kerwick
The Republican Rules Of The Road, According To Colin Powell: (Jacking The GOP From Conservatives)
 by John Quayle
Twelve Years of Iranian Lobby
 by Hassan Daioleslam
Non Compos Mentis
 by Lisa Fabrizio
Obama’s Limited Intelligence
 by Aaron Goldstein
Why Panetta?
 by Phillip Ellis Jackson
Is Israeli Policy Crazy?
 by Ivan Eland
Military Keynesianism to the Rescue?
 by Robert Higgs
Conservative Reformation
 by Alan Roebuck



Book Reviews



Features







         Top 25