<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Breakdown of the American Polity: Part 1: Mrs. Hillary Clinton and the Neo-Marxist Democrats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2007/12/13/the-breakdown-of-the-american-polity-part-1-mrs-hillary-clinton-and-the-neo-marxist-democrats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2007/12/13/the-breakdown-of-the-american-polity-part-1-mrs-hillary-clinton-and-the-neo-marxist-democrats/</link>
	<description>Conservative and Libertarian Intellectual Philosophy and Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:00:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: GreginNY</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2007/12/13/the-breakdown-of-the-american-polity-part-1-mrs-hillary-clinton-and-the-neo-marxist-democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-66504</link>
		<dc:creator>GreginNY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 01:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2007/12/13/the-breakdown-of-the-american-polity-part-1-mrs-hillary-clinton-and-the-neo-marxist-democrats/#comment-66504</guid>
		<description>I think that we&#039;ve reached a new plateau on I.C.  Never in the history of this page, has a writer written more and said less than this.  Let&#039;s look at a couple of examples.  The writer states:

&quot;That is, we have chosen to ignore man’s inherent quest for the divine, thus losing our ability to engage in an analysis of man’s right order predicated on an “agreement with the order of being.”

Please support that statement.  Man has an inherent quest for the divine?  Are you saying that we&#039;re biologically pre-disposed to seek divinity?  Please share your evidence of that.  Further, if we had an order &quot;predicated on an agreement with the order of being&quot;, we apparenty all believed we were subservient to the divine being...and by extension we all believed in a common divinity.  Gosh, our founding fathers in the United States were quite different than the founders in your country.  But, it gets better.....you state:

&quot;Mrs. Clinton’s psyche exhibits, as is the case with anyone captured by ideological deformations, a rebellion against “the cosmic order,” against God. She is an righteous ideologue whose rise to the presidency will herald a new age in America where the parousiastic concept of “being construed as immanent” will finally come to fruition so she may claim her place as deliverer from the evil, chaos, and ignorance of our time.&quot;

Don&#039;t you hate people with &quot;ideological deformations&quot;?  If we only all thought alike, like the founders of your country.  Imagine the horror...rebelling against &quot;the cosmic order, against God&quot;.  If we could be more like the Godly nations.  Iran comes to mind.  The Iranian regieme ensures that citizens comply eith &quot;the cosmic order&quot;.  I wish we could be more like Iran...or the country you&#039;re from.  What a wonderful world it must be.

I hope this wasn&#039;t a clever work of satire. I&#039;d be embarrassed if I fell for someone who was being tongue in cheeks.

GreginNY (United States of America)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that we&#8217;ve reached a new plateau on I.C.  Never in the history of this page, has a writer written more and said less than this.  Let&#8217;s look at a couple of examples.  The writer states:</p>
<p>&#8220;That is, we have chosen to ignore man’s inherent quest for the divine, thus losing our ability to engage in an analysis of man’s right order predicated on an “agreement with the order of being.”</p>
<p>Please support that statement.  Man has an inherent quest for the divine?  Are you saying that we&#8217;re biologically pre-disposed to seek divinity?  Please share your evidence of that.  Further, if we had an order &#8220;predicated on an agreement with the order of being&#8221;, we apparenty all believed we were subservient to the divine being&#8230;and by extension we all believed in a common divinity.  Gosh, our founding fathers in the United States were quite different than the founders in your country.  But, it gets better&#8230;..you state:</p>
<p>&#8220;Mrs. Clinton’s psyche exhibits, as is the case with anyone captured by ideological deformations, a rebellion against “the cosmic order,” against God. She is an righteous ideologue whose rise to the presidency will herald a new age in America where the parousiastic concept of “being construed as immanent” will finally come to fruition so she may claim her place as deliverer from the evil, chaos, and ignorance of our time.&#8221;</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t you hate people with &#8220;ideological deformations&#8221;?  If we only all thought alike, like the founders of your country.  Imagine the horror&#8230;rebelling against &#8220;the cosmic order, against God&#8221;.  If we could be more like the Godly nations.  Iran comes to mind.  The Iranian regieme ensures that citizens comply eith &#8220;the cosmic order&#8221;.  I wish we could be more like Iran&#8230;or the country you&#8217;re from.  What a wonderful world it must be.</p>
<p>I hope this wasn&#8217;t a clever work of satire. I&#8217;d be embarrassed if I fell for someone who was being tongue in cheeks.</p>
<p>GreginNY (United States of America)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Layer Seven</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2007/12/13/the-breakdown-of-the-american-polity-part-1-mrs-hillary-clinton-and-the-neo-marxist-democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-66425</link>
		<dc:creator>Layer Seven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 14:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2007/12/13/the-breakdown-of-the-american-polity-part-1-mrs-hillary-clinton-and-the-neo-marxist-democrats/#comment-66425</guid>
		<description>The more I read this article, the more I like it.  In fact, I LOVE it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The more I read this article, the more I like it.  In fact, I LOVE it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: philwynk</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2007/12/13/the-breakdown-of-the-american-polity-part-1-mrs-hillary-clinton-and-the-neo-marxist-democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-66275</link>
		<dc:creator>philwynk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 20:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2007/12/13/the-breakdown-of-the-american-polity-part-1-mrs-hillary-clinton-and-the-neo-marxist-democrats/#comment-66275</guid>
		<description>parousiastic = relating to the second coming of Christ and the end of all things. parousia = summing up of all things in Christ.

The author is saying that Ms. Clinton presents herself as a Messiah.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>parousiastic = relating to the second coming of Christ and the end of all things. parousia = summing up of all things in Christ.</p>
<p>The author is saying that Ms. Clinton presents herself as a Messiah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Kurt</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2007/12/13/the-breakdown-of-the-american-polity-part-1-mrs-hillary-clinton-and-the-neo-marxist-democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-66258</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Kurt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 04:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2007/12/13/the-breakdown-of-the-american-polity-part-1-mrs-hillary-clinton-and-the-neo-marxist-democrats/#comment-66258</guid>
		<description>Please define: parousiastic</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please define: parousiastic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LiveFreeDieFree</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2007/12/13/the-breakdown-of-the-american-polity-part-1-mrs-hillary-clinton-and-the-neo-marxist-democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-66257</link>
		<dc:creator>LiveFreeDieFree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 03:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2007/12/13/the-breakdown-of-the-american-polity-part-1-mrs-hillary-clinton-and-the-neo-marxist-democrats/#comment-66257</guid>
		<description>What?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

