The Battleground Poll has consistently showed that 6 out of 10 Americans describe themselves as either “very conservative” or “somewhat conservative.”
This Christmas, conservatives have been given another gift: we are the overwhelming majority of America. This is not “news.” I have written an article about the Battleground Poll every time a Battleground Poll has come out since June 2002. The results are always the same: people who call themselves either “conservative” or “very conservative” constitute the overwhelming majority of all Americans.
Does this seem odd? Certainly critics of my articles have said so. Do Americans really understand what “conservative” means? Well, in ten straight polls, spaced apart by about six months each, Americans have been asked that question. They have been asked to describe themselves as “very conservative,” “somewhat conservative,” “moderate,” “somewhat liberal,” “very liberal,” or “don’t know / refused to answer.” This choice seems to be inclusive. If someone is a moderate, then he can choose to answer “moderate.” If someone is confused by ideological labels, he can answer “don’t know/refused.”
How could anyone in America today be genuinely confused by that? Yet confusion is the only answer to a consistent response over a number of years to the identical question in repeated Battleground Polls. What has been the response to that question since June 2002? In June 2002, fifty-nine percent of Americans called themselves “somewhat conservative” or “very conservative.” In September 2003, that percentage was again exactly fifty-nine percent. In April of 2004, sixty percent of Americans called themselves “very conservative” or “somewhat conservative.” In June of that year, the percentage dropped one point to fifty-nine percent of Americans, and in September 2004, that percentage rose a point to sixty percent of Americans. In October 2005, that percentage was sixty-one percent. In March 2006, the percentage was fifty-nine percent and in October 2006, just before the Republican Party took a licking, the percentage had actually risen to sixty-one percent of Americans calling themselves “very conservative” or “somewhat conservative.” In January 2007, after that November debacle, fifty-nine percent of Americans called themselves “very conservative” or “somewhat conservative.” Then in July 2007, sixty-three percent of Americans called themselves “very conservative” or “somewhat conservative.” Ten straight Battleground Polls over more than five years, and the between fifty-nine and sixty-three percent of Americans, when given six different choices, four of which did not have “conservative,” chose to be identified as conservative.
So what has changed? Nothing has changed. The Battleground Poll released December 19, 2007 shows that fifty-eight percent of Americans called themselves either “very conservative” or “somewhat conservative.” Only thirty-six percent of Americans called themselves “very liberal” or “somewhat liberal.” If the election involved only conservative and liberal voters, the conservative candidate would win every state and win nationally by a landslide unprecedented in the history of the two-party system. Even if all moderate voters and all undecided voters went with the liberal candidate, the conservative candidate would win by a majority equal to Ronald Reagan in 1984.
Is there a message for conservatives? Of course! Think Ronald Reagan; think conservative; think the American people. The Left has sold us a bill of goods that somehow the conservative majority is not a majority. Is that why Hillary is so eagerly embracing the label of “liberal?” (That’s right. She’s not, is she? She is a “progressive” or something else that is consciously confusing.)
Americans know what they want. They have seen the Hurricane Katrina that is liberalism and Leftism in America. They want someone who is unmistakably conservative. That someone may be Mike Huckabee or Fred Thompson or someone else, but as long as the candidate is truly and clearly conservative, he will win the election. Does anyone doubt why every Republican candidate has tried to portray himself as the next Ronald Reagan? Does anyone doubt that Ronald Reagan was the most overtly conservative president our nation has had in the last eighty years? Can any Republican candidate add sums and do the math?
Ignore the mainstream press and ignore the pundits of the Beltway. Embrace genuine conservative principles and let the Left pillory you for being “too conservative.” America wants conservative leaders to run our nation. The Battleground Poll is right: it is right the last eleven times over the last five-and-a-half years. This bipartisan and thorough poll inadvertently reveals the most important political fact in America today: the voters are not just generally conservative, but overwhelmingly conservative year in and year out. Find the right man to embrace that truth and we will have our next Reagan.
bwalker2004@cox.net
http://www.amazon.com/Sinisterism-Secular-Religion-Revised-Updated/dp/1432705466
Read more articles by Bruce Walker



People might call themselves “liberal”, “conservative”, or whatever, but what are they, and what is more important, how do they vote? Recalling a dialog between Alice and the knight:
“You are sad,” the Knight said in an anxious tone. “Let me sing you a song to comfort you. The name of the song is called Haddocks’ Eyes.”
“Oh, that’s the name of the song, is it?” Alice said, trying to feel interested.
“No, you don’t understand,” the Knight said, looking a little vexed. “That’s what the name is called. The name really is The Aged, Aged Man.”
“Then I ought to have said, ‘That’s what the song is called’?”, Alice corrected herself.
“No, you oughtn’t; that’s quite another thing! The song is called Ways and Means, – but that’s only what
it’ s called, you know!”
“Well, what is the song, then?” said Alice, who was by this time completely bewildered.
I was coming to that,” the Knight said. “The song really is A-Swing on a Gate – and the tune’s my own invention.”
Lewis Carroll, Through the Looking Glass.
“If the election involved only conservative and liberal voters, the conservative candidate would win every state and win nationally by a landslide unprecedented in the history of the two-party system.”
This is not true because not everyone votes his political leaning. Ask almost anyone, and the answer will inevitably be a self-congratulatory, "I vote the man."
Comment by sedonaman | December 31, 2007
I'm a participant in Zogby online polls. Zogby always asks the respondent to describe his/her political ideology. I always answer conservative.
As a self described conservative, I have little in common with neo-conservatives. I'm not a big government, nanny state conservative. I don't support the Patriot Act, a constitutional amendement to ban abortion or define marriage, prohibit flag burning and the like. I'm not overly concerned that terrorism threatens our country, nor do I support a "war on terrorism", where "the enemy" is in the eye of the beholder. I am a conservative. Outside of Ron Paul, the Republican Party has a conservative void.
I wonder if the results would change if the battleground poll asked a second question. "As a conservative (or liberal), do you think your party repesents your views?"
Don't confuse conservativism with republicanism. The former is an ideology, the later a political party. Only citizen-sheep confuse the two.
GreginNY
Comment by GreginNY | December 31, 2007
I'm not certain how Battleground defines these things, but I'm not surprised at the results. America's Democrats are roughly in the same political position as Europe's Christian Democrats and the Republicans cover the EuroLiberals and other right-wing parties. Europe's Social Democrats are comparable to only a small share of US Democrats.
Comment by freelunch | January 1, 2008
When people refer to themselves as conservatives, they are referring to the issue that is most important to them–fiscal or social. Fiscal conservative + social liberal = Libertarian, eg Ron Paul; fiscal conservative + social moderate = Mainline Republican, eg Mitt; Fiscal moderate + social conservative = Christian right, eg Huck. The only way we can actually win this election is to appeal to at least two out of three of these groups. For different reasons, all three of these candidates alienate the other two groups.
Comment by Steve W. | January 1, 2008
[…] If that's so, then kindly explain to us why, in ten consecutive polls taken over five years of alleged "malaise and war-weariness" and "increasing calls for 'moderate' and 'compassionate' conservatism", 59-63% of American voters stubbornly self-identify as "very conservative" or "somewhat conservative." […]
Pingback by Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler » Something to Think About | January 27, 2008