January 27th, 2008

Could There Be Gold In Them Swamps For Romney?

 by Aaron Goldstein  
| View comments | Print This Post Print This Post

With the exit of Fred Thompson, conservatives will settle for Mitt Romney.

A fortnight ago, Mitt Romney’s presidential campaign was on the precipice of collapse after disappointing finishes in Iowa and New Hampshire where he had been expected to win. But fortune smiled on him in his home state of Michigan on January 15th. Four days later, Romney triumphed in the Nevada Caucuses. Although he would finish a distant fourth that same night in the South Carolina Primary, Nevada proved to be richer in delegates than the Palmetto state. A lucky streak in hand, Romney has taken his dice to Florida looking for gold in them swamps.  There’s a good chance he’ll find it.

So what does Romney have going for him? Well, not much actually. His message isn’t appreciably different than it was a month ago. However, things have not gone so wonderfully for our economy and anxiety about it has increased dramatically in the first month of 2008; anxious voters are willing to listen to someone with a strong business acumen. Things are also not going so wonderfully for his opponents. Onetime frontrunner Rudy Giuliani has been sinking like a stone despite putting nearly all of his resources in the Sunshine state. His strategy to forego Iowa and New Hampshire allowed Mike Huckabee to come out from obscurity and John McCain to come back from the dead.

However, Huckabee peaked in Iowa. Despite a strong second-place finish in South Carolina, Huckabee does not have the funds to put much in the way of television and radio advertising to effectively compete. Even a well-placed karate kick from Chuck Norris won’t be enough to get much needed airtime. On the other hand, McCain is very competitive in Florida and is running first in several polls, albeit narrowly and within the margin of error. However, McCain and Giuliani share a very similar voter universe. Both candidates are strong on national security issues.  McCain was a hero in Vietnam and was right about the surge in Iraq. Giuliani was a hero in the aftermath of September 11, 2001. Both are outspoken against Islamic fundamentalist terrorism. Both men have relatively moderate social views (although McCain is pro-life while Giuliani is pro-choice concerning abortion). But given their similarities, McCain and Giuliani will split that voter universe unless Giuliani’s vote collapses and coalesces around McCain. Short of such a collapse, this split benefits one Mitt Romney.

What benefits Romney even more is the exit of Fred Thompson from the GOP race earlier this week. While Thompson is a close friend of McCain and even supported his White House bid in 2000, the Fred Heads want a dye-in-the-wool conservative.  In the absence of Thompson, they’ll settle for Romney. It will be enough to put Romney over the top in Florida. Mitt Romney is in the right place at the right time.  If a week in politics is a lifetime, a fortnight is an eternity. If Romney finds a pot of gold in Orlando, it will be worth the wait. Then he can look forward to the next lifetime until Super Tuesday.

Elections & Political Parties



Aaron Goldstein writes about the things that pique his insatiable curiosity. In addition to politics, he is an aficionado of baseball, poetry, music and ketchup flavored potato chips. Aaron satiates his various appetites in Boston.
aargold24@hotmail.com
http://www.poetsforthewar.org

Read more articles by Aaron Goldstein

  1. Fred Thompson stood head and shoulders above all the other presidential candidates. Pathetically, with him out of the race, it is now necessary to support the remaining campaigner who is the least unacceptable.

    So Mitt Romney is now the one. I suppose I can get over him being a reformed ultra-liberal. I suppose I can get over his support for universal healthcare. I suppose I can get over his support for citizenship for illegal immigrants already here.

    Mike Huckabee wants to cap troop levels; supports amnesty AND citizenship for illegal immigrants already here; is a big spender and supports increasing the minimum wage; supports a cap/reduction of "global warming" emissions; opposes school vouchers.

    John McCain and Rudy Juliani are straight out "RINOs".

    Ron Paul is a political quack and a dangerous utopian "non-interventionist".

    Regardless, I will pull the lever for whichever candidate the pachyderms post, as a much lesser evil to the prospect of a sociocrat POTUS. The worst possible scenario, perish the thought, is the Clintons being back in the white house!

    Comment by compugor | January 27, 2008

  2. Fred Thompson stood head and shoulders above all the other presidential candidates.

    He certainly didn't manage to persuade very many Republicans that this statement was true. Why wasn't it obvious to them?

    Comment by freelunch | January 27, 2008

  3. "He certainly didn’t manage to persuade very many Republicans that this statement was true. Why wasn’t it obvious to them?"

    Lack of money and internal party support, along with distaste and even hostility toward campaigning, and a speaking style that isn't well suited to the "30-second-position-in-a-sentence" debate format all played roles. But are you asking because you actually care, or just to be a pest?

    Comment by Patrick Mulligan | January 28, 2008

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.