February 17th, 2008

Calm Sun, Cold Earth

 by Alan Caruba  
| View comments | Print This Post Print This Post

What controls the Earth’s climate? The Sun!

I can understand why people believe that global warming is real and that all the things Greens say are true. One cannot read a newspaper or magazine, turn on the television or radio, without getting the Green message.

Since switching their message in the 1970s that an Ice Age was coming to the complete fiction of a massive, dramatic global warming due to greenhouse gases, the Greens have been able to influence policy at the international and national level. They have been utterly relentless, a modern version of the Mongols on horseback who swept out of the East to conquer everything before them until they reached the gates of Europe. These days the Greens have long since conquered Europe.

One thing alone stands against the Greens. The SCIENCE does not support them. Their sense of moral superiority, their contempt for all things modern, their resistance to all forms of energy except the weakest —wind and solar — and at the very heart of the Greens’ message is a contempt and hatred for the human race.

Humans have come to dominate life on Earth because we know how to adapt to the planet. We know how to use its minerals, the riches of its plant life, the domestication of its animals, and its reserves of energy in the form of coal, oil, natural gas, and nuclear fission, to fuel the creation of great cities, farms and ranches, and everything that passes for modern civilization.

Long ago humans conquered the continents of the Earth and its great oceans to spread everywhere. Humans now fly between continents in hours. Everywhere on the face of the Earth humans now communicate with one another via the Internet.

For billions of years the Earth existed without humans and it will do so again when we cease to inhabit it. As a species, we are newcomers, but like every other species that lived on planet Earth — 95% of which are extinct — we are subject to forces far greater than anything we possess.

To suggest that humans actually cause climate change is such idiocy that the Earth itself reminds us daily of our vulnerabilities. The news is full of tornadoes, volcanic eruptions, hurricanes, blizzards, earthquakes, tsunamis, floods, and wildfires.

On February 7, Investors Business Daily had an editorial titled “The Sun Also Sets” in which it cited the views of Kenneth Tapping, a solar researcher and project director for Canada’s National Research Council. In essence, Tapping wants people to know that solar activity such as sunspots, i.e., magnetic storms, “has been disturbingly quiet.”

It’s useful to know that global temperatures and events closely reflect solar cycles.

The lack of activity “could signal the beginning of what is known as the Maunder Minimum.” While solar cycles tend to last about 11 years, the lack of normal or increased activity can trigger the Maunder Minimum, an event that occurs every few centuries, can last as long as a century, and causes a colder earth.

The most recent such event was the mini-Ice Age that climatologists date from around 1300 to 1850. In the midst of this there was a distinct solar hibernation from around 1650 to 1715.

Tapping reports no change in the sun’s magnetic field so far this cycle and if the sun remains quiet for another year or two, it may indicate a repeat of that period of drastic cooling of the Earth, bringing massive snowfall and severe weather to the Northern Hemisphere.

If these events continue and become a cycle of cooling, it represents a major threat to the Earth’s population because it means that food crops will fail and, with them, the means to feed livestock, and the rest of us.

If you have been paying attention to global weather reports, you know that China has had the heaviest snowfall in at least three decades. David Deming, a geophysicist, in a December 19, 2007 article in The Washington Times, noted that, “South America this year experienced one of its coldest winters in decades. In Buenos Aires, snow fell for the first time since the year 1918.” This occurred across the entire Southern Hemisphere. “Johannesburg, South Africa, had the first significant snowfall in 26 years. Australia experienced the coldest June ever.”

It must be said that one big blizzard does not an Ice Age make, but a whole series of events that suggest a cooling cycle may well be the warning that is being ignored in the midst of the vast global warming hoax.

Dr. Oleg Sorokhtin, Merited Scientist of Russia and fellow of the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences, is staff researcher of the Oceanology Institute. He recently published a commentary asserting that a global cold spell could replace global warming. Note that the Earth has been warming — about one degree Fahrenheit — since the last mini-Ice Age ended around 1850. “The real reasons for climate change are uneven solar radiation,” said Dr. Sorokhtin, while citing other factors including the Earth’s axis gyration and instability of oceanic currents.

“Astrophysics knows two solar activity cycles, of 11 and 200 years. Both are caused by changes in the radius and area of the irradiating solar surface.” Yes, the Sun itself goes through periods of change. Dr. Sorokhtin believes that, “Earth has passed the peak of its warmer period and a fairly cold spell will set in quite soon, by 2012. Real cold will come when solar activity reaches its minimum, by 2041, and will last for 50-60 years or even longer.”

There is a reason scientists refer to our current era as an “interglacial period,” i.e., a time between Ice Ages.

Up to now, the mainstream media has ignored the cold reality of the Earth’s known cooling cycles. They have been in complete thrall to the howling of Al Gore with his endless lies about an imminent warming. Given the accolade of a Nobel Prize and even a Hollywood Oscar, why should people unschooled in science believe otherwise?

The United Nations International Panel on Climate Change — whose reports have been based not on hard science such as observations of solar activity, but on flawed, often deliberately false computer models — has been the driving factor behind the global warming hoax. What better way to assert political and economic control over the Earth than to create a global crisis? To their credit, many participants in the IPCC have protested these reports.

Large numbers of scientists have sold their soul to the global warming lies in order to receive millions in research grants, but increasingly other scientists have been coming forth to tell the truth. On March 2-4, several hundred will convene in New York for the 2008 International Conference on Climate Change to offer papers and serve on panels disputing and debunking the global warming hoax.

Beyond the climatic threat of a cooling planet is the one posed by U.S. politicians and their counterparts in Europe who are seeking to impose all manner of regulation and limits on energy use based on the false assertion that greenhouse gas emissions are causing global warming.

They want to mandate a “cap-and-trade” scheme that will make some people and industries wealthy selling credits that will permit greenhouse gas emissions. But it is not greenhouse gases we need to fear, it is the action or, in this case, the inaction of the Sun.

At the very moment the Earth is on the cusp of what is likely to be a very long cooling and possibly a full scale repeat of the last Ice Age, all the engines of government, nationally and internationally, are trying to inhibit the discovery, extraction, and use of energy reserves that will be needed to cope with climate changes that will impact millions and, ultimately, billions of people.

All the wind turbines and solar panels in the world will not keep you warm in your home or apartment when a short- or long-term cooling of the Earth occurs. Ironically, as the Greens rant about so-called endangered polar bears in the Arctic, the bears are far more likely to survive than humans.

What controls the Earth’s climate? The Sun!

Environment, Animal Rights, Health Issues, & Drugs



Alan Caruba is the author of Right Answers: Separating Fact from Fantasy. His weekly commentaries are posted on the Internet site of The National Anxiety Center.
ACaruba@aol.com
http://www.anxietycenter.com/

Read more articles by Alan Caruba

Bookmark and Share

  1. I agree that man-made global warming is a ridiculous hoax. I do take issue with the inference that man is the product of billions of years of evolution, and that we have simply become the dominant organism on the planet due to random selection. Man is the offspring of God. We are here on earth for a purpose, and our dominion over the animals and the environemnt is no accident. Consequently, we should be good stewards of the earth. Science has always walked a crooked path in its valuable search for truth. If we consider the works of an omniscient God, His forethought and preparation in creating the earth, the current "sky is falling" mentality relating to carbon emissions is all the more patently ridiculous.

    Comment by gop4ever | February 17, 2008

  2. Mr. Caruba, since you insist on defaming climate scientists and journals, please tell me what qualifies you to dismiss the scientific evidence. You have not referred to any science journal articles and your quotes are poorly sourced. When you claim specifically that the science does not support them, I expect you to actually provide scientific references, not vaguely attributed quotations, articles from newspapers and nothing from science journals.

    Comment by freelunch | February 18, 2008

  3. freelunch,

    If you read past articles by Caruba, or spend even a cursory amount of research time on Google, you can find what you're looking for. Understanding science, the scientific method, and taking into account relevant research and facts all qualify Mr. Caruba, or anyone else, to dismiss what a scientist tells them on any given subject. Scientists are not modern prophets. Sometimes they get things wrong. They have agendas. They vie for money. They manipulate data. They conduct bad research. I have a feeling that you would be mortified at someone taking the word of a religious authority at face value without examination. Why should we take that approach to science? What qualifies you to dismiss opposing viewpoints and research? If lay people aren't qualified to reject speculative scientific research, what makes them qualified to accept it? If discrepancies arise in science, which parties whim do we put ourselves at the mercy of?

    Comment by Patrick Mulligan | February 26, 2008

  4. Since Freelunch requires more than an opinion of the science, he can find it here: http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/02/27/a-show-of-hands-one-mans-take-on-climate-change-consensus/ . Just, for the record, I respect climate scientists honest enough to admit theirs is an immature science, not yet capable of making the kind of prediction AGW advocates have been making. I don't believe Mr. Caruba does that either, though he does scorn any scientist who has traded intellectual integrity for fame or a cushy job or put ideology before science. These latter, in particular, are unworthy of the label 'scientist'. Agenda-based science is not science, even when it manages to extend our knowledge. That is because it also poisons our understanding, wastes time and resources, and leads us into violating the very interests it purports to serve.

    Comment by Bob Stapler | February 28, 2008

  5. freelunch,

    Let's conduct a small experiment.

    The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) estimates that there are approximately 1.2 billion Muslims in the world. Other sources put that figure as low as 700 million. Regardless, let's assume that approximately one-sixth of the earth's 6B population is Muslim.

    That's a lot of people.

    I will further assume that you are not a Muslim.

    Please share with us, as a non-Muslim, what gives you the ability to assess whether that religion presents a true and accurate accounting of of the origin of man, man's responsibility to one another, a universal moral code, and a set of beliefs that determine where one will spend the hereafter, or whether there even is a hereafter.

    Oh, and please use only citations from accepted Muslim literature and the viewpoints of Muslim believers as you assess the veracity of Islam.

    Now, compare these demands against those you have required of Caruba. See any similarities?

    Mr. Mulligan, as usual, did a fine job of asking some very pointed questions, which you can add to my questions here.

    We await your answer.

    Comment by Steve Sabin | February 28, 2008

  6. Excellent article, Mr. Caruba. Thank you.

    Is it really too late to achieve freedom from coercion on our planet?

    Vote Individualists Party. Take back your individual rights. That's the only way to fight the irrationality of the Greencompoops. We all need to be free of coercion, so that those who disagree with the Greens' idea can be free to fund the nuclear power plants, the intelligent recycling research that's desperately needed and all kinds of as yet unimagined inventions and discoveries that our species is capable of creating and detecting.

    Those who disagree with the environmentalists simply need to be free from coercion by those who agree with them. When a persuasive argument is needed to raise the funds that pay those research grants, then let those who truly agree put the money in the pot for them. Stop taking MY money to pay for things with which I disagree.

    That's how I feel.

    Tha's the message I send to The Powers That Be when I vote for the Individualists Party. The thing our planet needs more than anything is Individual Right not to be coerced into funding or supporting that which one does not support.

    End the Taxation System of Government Funding NOW.

    Comment by AMAI | March 14, 2008

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.





Latest Articles

The Palin Strategy
 by Phillip Ellis Jackson
Sarah Palin Is Not Just An Average Hockey Mom
 by Aaron Goldstein
A Star is Born: Maybe
 by George Shadroui
Genesis of Shi’a Islam
 by Amil Imani
A Conservative In Los Angeles
 by Nancy Morgan
Convention Confusion
 by Lisa Fabrizio
AAJLJ Explores Legal Options to Ahmadinejad
 by Fern Sidman
The Vast Left Wing Conspiracy
 by Alan Caruba
Ladies First: Palin Choice Corrects Narrative Of History
 by Bernie Reeves



Book Reviews



Features




         Top 25