<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Anxious Days Indeed: An Interview with Patricia Pearson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/02/29/anxious-days-indeed-an-interview-with-patricia-pearson/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/02/29/anxious-days-indeed-an-interview-with-patricia-pearson/</link>
	<description>Conservative and Libertarian Intellectual Philosophy and Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:00:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Stapler</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/02/29/anxious-days-indeed-an-interview-with-patricia-pearson/comment-page-1/#comment-71075</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Stapler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 21:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/02/29/anxious-days-indeed-an-interview-with-patricia-pearson/#comment-71075</guid>
		<description>I found her CBC site disappointing and inclined to parrot the MSM.  What she says here about anxiety is of a similar caliber and leaves me feeling she&#039;s stretching.  Not that she does not know her topic, only I cant get much of feeling how well from this interview.  Her Pearson&#039;s Posts site, however, has some really great writing.  It&#039;s almost as though there are two different people presented here, and as much a mystery as the crimes she reports on.   I was as much engrossed reading about her personal odyssey into a 23-year old unsolved murder as her foray into dog-telepathy. I&#039;d love to read more of these from her.  That, to me, is far more compelling I should give her book a try.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found her CBC site disappointing and inclined to parrot the MSM.  What she says here about anxiety is of a similar caliber and leaves me feeling she&#8217;s stretching.  Not that she does not know her topic, only I cant get much of feeling how well from this interview.  Her Pearson&#8217;s Posts site, however, has some really great writing.  It&#8217;s almost as though there are two different people presented here, and as much a mystery as the crimes she reports on.   I was as much engrossed reading about her personal odyssey into a 23-year old unsolved murder as her foray into dog-telepathy. I&#8217;d love to read more of these from her.  That, to me, is far more compelling I should give her book a try.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

