What if there is actually some truth in Wright’s allegations?
With all the heated feelings and rhetoric surrounding the firestorm that is Rev. Jeremiah Wright, a bit of truth-telling may be in order. Conservatives have demanded that Barack Obama repudiate all of the controversial statements made by his spiritual advisor, while supporters of the Illinois Senator believe that he has sufficiently distanced himself from them. But what if there is actually some truth in Wright’s allegations?
Barack Obama is said to be a tremendous orator, and the speech he delivered last week was hailed by many as superb and spiritually moving. And he should know about preaching and inspiring events; after all, his justification of same-sex unions based on the Sermon on the Mount earlier this month was quite illuminating. But, laying aside his racially-tinged, finger-pointing diatribe itself, let’s go to the veracity of a few of his Pastor’s statements and the extent to which Obama and those of his party may or may not be in agreement with them.
One of Wright’s dependable mantras is that America is a country controlled by “rich, white people,” who, according to him, are doing harm to people of color. To a certain extent this is true. There is a large group of people for whom it is politically expedient to keep blacks in “their place.” But these rich white folks — let’s call them limousine liberals — are those who support Barack Obama and the Democratic Party.
Almost from this country’s founding, politicians of all stripes have been known to make promises to those in need of government largesse. But Franklin Delano Roosevelt used his New Deal coalition to form a solid Democratic base of big city political machines, labor unions, subsidized farm groups and ethnic and racial minorities, which purchased millions of votes via federal handouts.
This was honed into an art form in later years by Democrats who, unlike their predecessors, sought to keep those in need perpetually needy, and therefore dependable on Election Day. This is the ugly truth of modern liberalism. Keeping minorities dependant on government help instead of self-help is their goal; and race and class envy are their weapons. Indeed, in his “healing” speech, Obama identified our “corporate culture” as the “real culprits of the middle-class squeeze.”
We used to salute as “Captains of Industry" risk-takers who invested their own money in order to found solid companies which used their profits to create jobs for all classes of people. These men drove the machine that fueled the American dream. Today, those once proud men are now shunned as “culprits” by liberals, some of whom have grown wealthy investing in the very corporations they seek to vilify and drive into submission via unionization, litigation, regulation and taxation. And when these burdens become too heavy to bear and these companies are forced to relocate offshore, they are deemed un-American.
Rev. Wright has famously said of the 9/11 attacks, that Americans were “indignant because the stuff we have done overseas is now brought right back to our own front yards. America's chickens are coming home to roost.” And, despite the view of liberal relativists who believe there are no objective truths — such as, you’re either with the terrorists or against them — this charge actually has a ring of accuracy to it.
Most Americans believe that “the stuff” we’ve been doing overseas for decades- — liberating countless millions of people of all faiths and colors from brutal regimes and dictators in every corner of the world — is a major reason why thugs like Osama bin Laden despise us and our way of life. But a belief that countries like America may be the only thing standing athwart bin Laden’s dreams of global Islamist domination, is incomprehensible to liberals who believe that all American military actions are somehow ‘imperial’ in nature.
Probably the most outrageous claim of Rev. Wright is that our government lied about its involvement in inventing “the HIV virus as a means of genocide against people of color.” Here, he’s got the right church but the wrong pew. The real genocide perpetrated against all of the American people and particularly its people of color was, in a way, brought to bear by a branch of our own government. The U.S. Supreme Court, usurping the powers of the legislative branch and therefore the American people, discovered out of whole cloth the right of women to murder their own children in the womb.
You can total up all of the deaths that Wright and his ilk assign to the Imperial U.S. of A., and they wouldn’t be a drop in the bucket next to the 40 million or so American children — one-third of whom were black — whose lives have been brutally cut short by abortion and its supporters. And who are these supporters?
Well, the parent denomination of Wright and Obama’s congregation, the United Church of Christ, for one. In a 1996 document, the UCC supported President Clinton’s veto of the Partial Birth Abortion ban stating, “The directorate of the UCC's social action office first addressed the abortion issue in 1970, affirming freedom of choice for women, calling for church action supporting the repeal of overly restrictive abortion legislation and encouraging the expansion of sex education programs.”
Wright has famously asked God to damn America and only time will tell if his invocation is worthy of God’s ear. But one thing is certain; if we continue to elect politicians who would use racial hatred and class envy to hold people back; who would have us shrink in fear of “chickens coming home to roost” when confronted by our enemies; or would use His name to support the killing of unborn children; we will have damned ourselves.
mailbox@lisafab.com
http://www.lisafab.com
Read more articles by Lisa Fabrizio














"Chickens coming home to roost" may be an accurate charge in another way. What the Islamists hate most about us is our immorality. The very moral license so celebrated by the Left is what is exacerbating the ire of the Muslim world.
Comment by Mountain Man | March 27, 2008
How true, Lisa!
The Clintons are the embodiment of the “rich, white people”.
The Clintons are apoplectic at Obama’s success in this race. They claim for themselves the ‘right’ to advance African-American interests. Blacks seeking to do it for themselves are nothing less than traitors to the Clintons – traitors who must be punished.
For all their pious pronouncements about the people being heard, they are prepared to reduce the Democratic Party to rubble if they do not get their way (which is fine by me).
But is it not ironic that the Clintons can claim, on the one hand, that Obama has effectively disenfranchised the voters in Florida and Michigan, while in the same breath claiming that Hillary can still win by garnering sufficient superdelegates to overturn the popular vote, and if that does not work for them, then even to induce elected delegates pledged to Obama to simply ignore the popular vote, and switch to Hillary?
The Democratic race is now precisely that – all about race.
And the really odd thing is that Obama actually embodies everything the Clintons have claimed to be fighting for all their lives. Their current antics show that it was all just rhetoric. The Clintons have only one interest – the Clintons. And if destroying the Democratic Party is what it takes to punish Obama for being an upstart black, then so be it.
They really are appalling people! But they are only a reflection of the Liberal deceit.
Who would have thought that the Clintons would be McCain’s secret weapon? A blessing or a curse, I wonder?
Joseph BH McMillan http://www.freedomvrights.com
Comment by Joseph BH McMillan | March 27, 2008
Lisa,
You salute to "Captains of Industry" fall short when you say they risk the investment of their own money. The Enron, World Comm. and Tyco executives showed it's the investors and stock holders whose investment is at risk. These so called captains we have now make sure their risk is minimal by giving thmselves and their executives outrageous salaries. Blaming the unions and taxes is crying towel of the rich elite who don't want to share the wealth. When you have the fox watching the henhouse you get the current mortgage meltdown, food contanimation and dangerous drugs. There are plenty of corporations that operate fine without unions, compensate and treat their employees fairly and don't over rate the top tier as the more important and needful of more money.
The Rev. Wright dribble of " USA of KKK and GD America" is nothing more than nation hatred. The United Church of Christ is considered a cult amongst the Christian community. Theire belief system is more in line with the Jehovva Witnneses and Mormons. They write their own scriptures and by laws. Looks like Obama chose an un-Church and not a true church.
Comment by andeke4 | March 29, 2008
Mountain Man,
Don't be so quick to condemn Western morality or use it to explain Muslim hatred of us. Muslim morality is demonstrably a good deal worse than our own. A great deal of Muslim liturature, including the One-Thousand and One [Arabian] Nights', directly contradicts fundamentalist assertions of morality and propriety, and many such works are positively debauched.
The worldview promoted by Islam still regards women as whores and condones marital infidelity, the attack and rape of unescorted women, wives discarded, ex-wives cheated of doweries, child-marriages, women forced to marry assailants, gang-rape of women for supposed crimes, 'honor-killings', pederasty and sodomy exceptions (apparently not sodomy unless the receiving-male enjoys it), racial-bigotry, religious/political murder and persecution, buying/selling women and children, slavery, almost non-existent widow-rights, institutionalized wife battering, conditional-lying (to infidels), castration and labial-mutilation, &c.
Despite all the hype regarding the Muslim distain of immoral pleasures, Muslims gamble, joke, cheat, get drunk and indulge drugs no less than some westerners (they just keep it hidden and pretend a superior morality) and take guilty pleasure in all that is forbidden. Muslim men are encouraged by their religion to lust after flesh, even though proscribing against particular aspects of it. What else are harems, polygamy, or the Koranic reward for martyrdom (72 of the most beautiful lusty virgins imaginable) if not utterly salacious incitement?
No, I don't think we need make any apologies to Muslims for having 'corrupted' their culture. If Muslim's attack us on the basis of such corruption, it can only be scapegoating.
http://www.friesian.com/poly-1b.htm
http://usinfo.state.gov/mena/img/assets/4756/121305_muslim_family_laws.pdf
http://www.faithfreedom.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=17378
Comment by Bob Stapler | March 31, 2008