Comments on: Convention Confusion http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/09/04/convention-confusion/ Conservative and Libertarian Intellectual Philosophy and Politics Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:00:53 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Patrick Mulligan http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/09/04/convention-confusion/comment-page-1/#comment-73580 Patrick Mulligan Tue, 09 Sep 2008 20:39:03 +0000 http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/09/04/convention-confusion/#comment-73580 Felix, Name two positive things one can say about the Democratic candidate - period. Two positive things is better than none positive things, wouldn't one say? It really shouldn't surprise one that conservatives will support the lesser of what they perceive as two evils. Can one seriously make the case that conservatives should vote for the Democratic party? But, if trolling a conservative blog makes one feel good, then that's great; it's cheaper than seeing a psychiatrist. Felix,

Name two positive things one can say about the Democratic candidate – period. Two positive things is better than none positive things, wouldn’t one say?

It really shouldn’t surprise one that conservatives will support the lesser of what they perceive as two evils. Can one seriously make the case that conservatives should vote for the Democratic party?

But, if trolling a conservative blog makes one feel good, then that’s great; it’s cheaper than seeing a psychiatrist.

]]> By: felix http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/09/04/convention-confusion/comment-page-1/#comment-73579 felix Tue, 09 Sep 2008 19:50:48 +0000 http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/09/04/convention-confusion/#comment-73579 If trashing the Democrats takes ones mind off the reality that there are only 2 positive things one can say about the Republican candidate, and that is "Sarah Palin", then that's great; it makes one feel good, and its cheaper than seeing a psychiatrist. If trashing the Democrats takes ones mind off the reality that there are only 2 positive things one can say about the Republican candidate, and that is “Sarah Palin”, then that’s great; it makes one feel good, and its cheaper than seeing a psychiatrist.

]]> By: Phillip Ellis Jackson http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/09/04/convention-confusion/comment-page-1/#comment-73513 Phillip Ellis Jackson Sat, 06 Sep 2008 05:58:20 +0000 http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/09/04/convention-confusion/#comment-73513 Ditto. Ditto.

]]> By: Patrick Mulligan http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/09/04/convention-confusion/comment-page-1/#comment-73512 Patrick Mulligan Sat, 06 Sep 2008 04:16:57 +0000 http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/09/04/convention-confusion/#comment-73512 "do the Democrats think that their whole audience is comprised of history-challenged dolts?" It is. That's what Democrats call "the base". Ill-informed, uninformed and misinformed morons who want to give their decision making power over to the government so they can excuse themselves of responsibility. Sadly, as the age old adage goes, ignorance is bliss. Stampeding these same morons behind your cause isn't difficult for the same reason that stampeding cattle isn't difficult. “do the Democrats think that their whole audience is comprised of history-challenged dolts?”

It is. That’s what Democrats call “the base”. Ill-informed, uninformed and misinformed morons who want to give their decision making power over to the government so they can excuse themselves of responsibility. Sadly, as the age old adage goes, ignorance is bliss. Stampeding these same morons behind your cause isn’t difficult for the same reason that stampeding cattle isn’t difficult.

]]>