Comments on: Palin’s Sudden Popularity has Feminists in a Snit http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/09/09/palin%e2%80%99s-sudden-popularity-has-feminists-in-a-snit/ Conservative and Libertarian Intellectual Philosophy and Politics Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:00:53 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Read This Link » Palin’s Sudden Popularity has Feminists in a Snit. http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/09/09/palin%e2%80%99s-sudden-popularity-has-feminists-in-a-snit/comment-page-1/#comment-81078 Read This Link » Palin’s Sudden Popularity has Feminists in a Snit. Sun, 10 Jan 2010 01:25:58 +0000 http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/09/09/palin%e2%80%99s-sudden-popularity-has-feminists-in-a-snit/#comment-81078 [...] Palin’s Sudden Popularity has Feminists in a Snit. [...] [...] Palin’s Sudden Popularity has Feminists in a Snit. [...]

]]> By: Britney Spears Database » Blog Archive » Palin fatigue http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/09/09/palin%e2%80%99s-sudden-popularity-has-feminists-in-a-snit/comment-page-1/#comment-74190 Britney Spears Database » Blog Archive » Palin fatigue Thu, 09 Oct 2008 10:43:13 +0000 http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/09/09/palin%e2%80%99s-sudden-popularity-has-feminists-in-a-snit/#comment-74190 [...] Candidacy Stokes Debate Among Women." No , Bonnie Chernin Rogoff, it’s not Palin’s "sudden popularity" that has feminists in a "snit." Yes, various religion- and motherhood-focused bloggers, [...] [...] Candidacy Stokes Debate Among Women." No , Bonnie Chernin Rogoff, it’s not Palin’s "sudden popularity" that has feminists in a "snit." Yes, various religion- and motherhood-focused bloggers, [...]

]]> By: Last Angry Man http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/09/09/palin%e2%80%99s-sudden-popularity-has-feminists-in-a-snit/comment-page-1/#comment-73712 Last Angry Man Mon, 15 Sep 2008 02:12:46 +0000 http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/09/09/palin%e2%80%99s-sudden-popularity-has-feminists-in-a-snit/#comment-73712 Because they are the "wrong" reproductive choices in their minds. To them, the concept isn't a set of choices, it's one and only one choice, which just coincidentally happens to be theirs. Because they are the “wrong” reproductive choices in their minds. To them, the concept isn’t a set of choices, it’s one and only one choice, which just coincidentally happens to be theirs.

]]> By: sedonaman http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/09/09/palin%e2%80%99s-sudden-popularity-has-feminists-in-a-snit/comment-page-1/#comment-73609 sedonaman Wed, 10 Sep 2008 21:48:58 +0000 http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/09/09/palin%e2%80%99s-sudden-popularity-has-feminists-in-a-snit/#comment-73609 Why are all her antagonists interfering with her reproductive choices? Why are all her antagonists interfering with her reproductive choices?

]]> By: Mickey G http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/09/09/palin%e2%80%99s-sudden-popularity-has-feminists-in-a-snit/comment-page-1/#comment-73600 Mickey G Wed, 10 Sep 2008 17:09:37 +0000 http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/09/09/palin%e2%80%99s-sudden-popularity-has-feminists-in-a-snit/#comment-73600 Sometimes we need to remind those pushing free abortion that they might not have been around to press their ideas if abortion had been legal. Beyond the emotional outbreaks and agenda pushing Palin is a threat to all politicians because she is willing to take on corruption. This means that all of their jobs are in jeopardy and they will stoop to any level to get rid of her. Sometimes we need to remind those pushing free abortion that they might not have been around to press their ideas if abortion had been legal.

Beyond the emotional outbreaks and agenda pushing Palin is a threat to all politicians because she is willing to take on corruption. This means that all of their jobs are in jeopardy and they will stoop to any level to get rid of her.

]]> By: Last Angry Man http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/09/09/palin%e2%80%99s-sudden-popularity-has-feminists-in-a-snit/comment-page-1/#comment-73584 Last Angry Man Wed, 10 Sep 2008 02:04:06 +0000 http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/09/09/palin%e2%80%99s-sudden-popularity-has-feminists-in-a-snit/#comment-73584 Odd. I cab think of numerous adult Liberals who are a "drain on society." Might I *terminate* them now? A "Drain on society." And what Marxist thought of THAT comment? Odd. I cab think of numerous adult Liberals who are a “drain on society.” Might I *terminate* them now?

A “Drain on society.” And what Marxist thought of THAT comment?

]]> By: VirginiaHarris http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/09/09/palin%e2%80%99s-sudden-popularity-has-feminists-in-a-snit/comment-page-1/#comment-73573 VirginiaHarris Tue, 09 Sep 2008 18:33:51 +0000 http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/09/09/palin%e2%80%99s-sudden-popularity-has-feminists-in-a-snit/#comment-73573 Thanks to the suffragettes, women have voices and choices! Read this for your daughters! Gloria Steinem and Governor Palin are proof that women can and do diverge on important issues. Even on the question of whether women should vote! Most people are totally in the dark about HOW the suffragettes won votes for women, and what life was REALLY like for women before they did. Suffragettes were opposed by many women who were what was known as 'anti.' The most influential 'anti' lived in the White House. First Lady Edith Wilson was a Washington widow who married President Wilson in 1915, after the death of his pro-suffrage wife. The First Lady's role in Wilson's decision to jail and torture Alice Paul and hundreds of other suffragettes will never be fully known, but she was outraged that these women picketed her husband's White House. I'd like to share a women's history learning opportunity... "The Privilege of Voting" is a new free e-mail series that follows eight great women from 1912 - 1920 to reveal ALL that happened to set the stage for women to win the vote. It's a real-life soap opera! And it's ALL true! Powerful suffragettes Alice Paul and Emmeline Pankhurst are featured, along with TWO gorgeous presidential mistresses, First Lady Edith Wilson, Edith Wharton, Isadora Duncan and Alice Roosevelt. There are tons of heartache on the rocky road to the ballot box, but in the end, women WIN! Exciting, sequential episodes are great to read on coffeebreaks, or anytime. Subscribe free at www.CoffeebreakReaders.com/subscribe.html Thanks to the suffragettes, women have voices and choices!

Read this for your daughters!

Gloria Steinem and Governor Palin are proof that women can and do diverge on important issues.

Even on the question of whether women should vote!

Most people are totally in the dark about HOW the suffragettes won votes for women, and what life was REALLY like for women before they did.

Suffragettes were opposed by many women who were what was known as ‘anti.’

The most influential ‘anti’ lived in the White House. First Lady Edith Wilson was a Washington widow who married President Wilson in 1915, after the death of his pro-suffrage wife.

The First Lady’s role in Wilson’s decision to jail and torture Alice Paul and hundreds of other suffragettes will never be fully known, but she was outraged that these women picketed her husband’s White House.

I’d like to share a women’s history learning opportunity…

“The Privilege of Voting” is a new free e-mail series that follows eight great women from 1912 – 1920 to reveal ALL that happened to set the stage for women to win the vote.

It’s a real-life soap opera! And it’s ALL true!

Powerful suffragettes Alice Paul and Emmeline Pankhurst are featured, along with TWO gorgeous presidential mistresses, First Lady Edith Wilson, Edith Wharton, Isadora Duncan and Alice Roosevelt.

There are tons of heartache on the rocky road to the ballot box, but in the end, women WIN!

Exciting, sequential episodes are great to read on coffeebreaks, or anytime.

Subscribe free at

http://www.CoffeebreakReaders.com/subscribe.html

]]> By: Mountain Man http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/09/09/palin%e2%80%99s-sudden-popularity-has-feminists-in-a-snit/comment-page-1/#comment-73570 Mountain Man Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:16:23 +0000 http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/09/09/palin%e2%80%99s-sudden-popularity-has-feminists-in-a-snit/#comment-73570 If the pro-choicers hate Palin's choice so much, maybe they'd suggest that Trig Palin simply be aborted now. After all, the kid is "defective," he'll be a drain on society. Margaret Sanger's eugenics legacy is intact. If the pro-choicers hate Palin’s choice so much, maybe they’d suggest that Trig Palin simply be aborted now. After all, the kid is “defective,” he’ll be a drain on society.

Margaret Sanger’s eugenics legacy is intact.

]]> By: Ivan Ivanovich http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/09/09/palin%e2%80%99s-sudden-popularity-has-feminists-in-a-snit/comment-page-1/#comment-73566 Ivan Ivanovich Tue, 09 Sep 2008 13:19:51 +0000 http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/09/09/palin%e2%80%99s-sudden-popularity-has-feminists-in-a-snit/#comment-73566 "…just about every issue that women support by a majority or plurality." Well now, there is a strong statement. First, there is “Just about”. So how many does that make”? Is it 99% or is it 67%. We don’t know but I’m sure Steinem meant for us the think the former. Then there is “majority” that could be anywhere from 100% to 51%. Then she adds “plurality”, the real kicker. If 33% are pro-life, 33% are somewhere in the middle, and 34% are pro-abortion then the Steinem side of the women have a plurality. Of course that leaves out half the population, which I’m sure she would like to do. Anyway, if the “Keep Roe V Wade” people are so worried, why don’t they start a campaign to amend the constitution? Answer: Because that will take a little more than just about a plurality of half the population, and she knows it. Better to obfuscate profusely. “…just about every issue that women support by a majority or plurality.”

Well now, there is a strong statement. First, there is “Just about”. So how many does that make”? Is it 99% or is it 67%. We don’t know but I’m sure Steinem meant for us the think the former. Then there is “majority” that could be anywhere from 100% to 51%. Then she adds “plurality”, the real kicker. If 33% are pro-life, 33% are somewhere in the middle, and 34% are pro-abortion then the Steinem side of the women have a plurality. Of course that leaves out half the population, which I’m sure she would like to do. Anyway, if the “Keep Roe V Wade” people are so worried, why don’t they start a campaign to amend the constitution? Answer: Because that will take a little more than just about a plurality of half the population, and she knows it. Better to obfuscate profusely.

]]>