<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Significance of Sarah</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/09/11/the-significance-of-sarah/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/09/11/the-significance-of-sarah/</link>
	<description>Conservative and Libertarian Intellectual Philosophy and Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:00:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ray reyns</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/09/11/the-significance-of-sarah/comment-page-1/#comment-74069</link>
		<dc:creator>ray reyns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 13:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/09/11/the-significance-of-sarah/#comment-74069</guid>
		<description>another brilliant article. almost as brilliant as the following quote from Sarah about the economy:

“That’s why I say I, like every American I’m speaking with, we’re all about this position that we have been put in where it is the taxpayers looking to bail out. But ultimately, what the bailout does is help those who are concerned about the healthcare reform that is needed to help shore up our economy. Um, helping, oh — it’s got to be all about job creation too. Shoring up our economy, and putting it back on the right track. So healthcare reform and reducing taxes and reigning in spending has got to accompany tax reductions, and tax relief for Americans, and trade, we’ve got to see trade as opportunity, not as a competitive, um, scary thing, but 1 in 5 jobs being created in the trade sector today. We’ve got to look at that as more opportunity. All of those things under the umbrella of job creation. This bailout is a part of that.”

yes this &quot;is a class of new political leaders&quot; alright...just what we need...down home yokels with guns...isn&#039;t she brilliant? and the think mr. laib, you were the first to recognize her value! congratualtions you big brain you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>another brilliant article. almost as brilliant as the following quote from Sarah about the economy:</p>
<p>“That’s why I say I, like every American I’m speaking with, we’re all about this position that we have been put in where it is the taxpayers looking to bail out. But ultimately, what the bailout does is help those who are concerned about the healthcare reform that is needed to help shore up our economy. Um, helping, oh — it’s got to be all about job creation too. Shoring up our economy, and putting it back on the right track. So healthcare reform and reducing taxes and reigning in spending has got to accompany tax reductions, and tax relief for Americans, and trade, we’ve got to see trade as opportunity, not as a competitive, um, scary thing, but 1 in 5 jobs being created in the trade sector today. We’ve got to look at that as more opportunity. All of those things under the umbrella of job creation. This bailout is a part of that.”</p>
<p>yes this &#8220;is a class of new political leaders&#8221; alright&#8230;just what we need&#8230;down home yokels with guns&#8230;isn&#8217;t she brilliant? and the think mr. laib, you were the first to recognize her value! congratualtions you big brain you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Stapler</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/09/11/the-significance-of-sarah/comment-page-1/#comment-73677</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Stapler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 22:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/09/11/the-significance-of-sarah/#comment-73677</guid>
		<description>P.S.  Scholars my a$$.  More likely two zit-faced kids in a dorm passing weed.  The &#039;scholars&#039; referenced are nowhere identified in the article, though numerous external articles and papers are mentioned (mostly without reference to the text).  The footnoted references are all to newspaper articles and opinion pieces, none of which rate the label &#039;scholarly&#039;.  Among the Wiki scholarly references are SourceWatch, Center for Global Studies, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, OpenDemocracy, and Columbia College (Chicago) which collectively reads like a Bush hit-list and the Wike article a hatchet job.  Ditto for the book references.  Every one of these articles was handpicked for the damage it could inflict on Bush without even the pretense of balance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P.S.  Scholars my a$$.  More likely two zit-faced kids in a dorm passing weed.  The &#8216;scholars&#8217; referenced are nowhere identified in the article, though numerous external articles and papers are mentioned (mostly without reference to the text).  The footnoted references are all to newspaper articles and opinion pieces, none of which rate the label &#8216;scholarly&#8217;.  Among the Wiki scholarly references are SourceWatch, Center for Global Studies, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, OpenDemocracy, and Columbia College (Chicago) which collectively reads like a Bush hit-list and the Wike article a hatchet job.  Ditto for the book references.  Every one of these articles was handpicked for the damage it could inflict on Bush without even the pretense of balance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Stapler</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/09/11/the-significance-of-sarah/comment-page-1/#comment-73676</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Stapler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 22:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/09/11/the-significance-of-sarah/#comment-73676</guid>
		<description>&quot;Scholars identify seven different Bush doctrines.&quot;

Why don&#039;t they just ask Bush his doctrine.  It&#039;s not like he died centuries ago.  He&#039;s right here!  

Nope, won&#039;t ever happen.  Liberals prefer to talk around conservatives like we don&#039;t exist other than as ogres with which to frighten children and each other.  LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Scholars identify seven different Bush doctrines.&#8221;</p>
<p>Why don&#8217;t they just ask Bush his doctrine.  It&#8217;s not like he died centuries ago.  He&#8217;s right here!  </p>
<p>Nope, won&#8217;t ever happen.  Liberals prefer to talk around conservatives like we don&#8217;t exist other than as ogres with which to frighten children and each other.  LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Stapler</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/09/11/the-significance-of-sarah/comment-page-1/#comment-73675</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Stapler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 22:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/09/11/the-significance-of-sarah/#comment-73675</guid>
		<description>Ivan,

Here I thought OHB was running for messiah or saint.  Now, I know he&#039;s just running for emperor I guess we can relax. ;-)

Regardless the way people like Felix and the less-than-gentle-woman-farmer view Palin, and even what more balanced critics may think, Palin is one sharp and tough cookie.  I dare either Felix or GWF to sit in the hot seat as Palin did giving well thought out answers, but also weathering the Gibson badgering trying to trick her into changing those answers to something he could use against her.  Moreover, her voice never wavered and she never once lost her cool, which most of us certainly would have given that kind of treatment.  Like or hate her, you should at least respect that kind of grace under pressure.  I haven&#039;t seen enough yet I&#039;d commit to, but what I have seen I like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ivan,</p>
<p>Here I thought OHB was running for messiah or saint.  Now, I know he&#8217;s just running for emperor I guess we can relax. ;-)</p>
<p>Regardless the way people like Felix and the less-than-gentle-woman-farmer view Palin, and even what more balanced critics may think, Palin is one sharp and tough cookie.  I dare either Felix or GWF to sit in the hot seat as Palin did giving well thought out answers, but also weathering the Gibson badgering trying to trick her into changing those answers to something he could use against her.  Moreover, her voice never wavered and she never once lost her cool, which most of us certainly would have given that kind of treatment.  Like or hate her, you should at least respect that kind of grace under pressure.  I haven&#8217;t seen enough yet I&#8217;d commit to, but what I have seen I like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivan Ivanovich</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/09/11/the-significance-of-sarah/comment-page-1/#comment-73659</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivan Ivanovich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 14:09:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/09/11/the-significance-of-sarah/#comment-73659</guid>
		<description>Opps! I just found an article by Charles Krauthammer (the originator of the phrase) at Townhall. He defines the situation much better than I did. Check it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Opps! I just found an article by Charles Krauthammer (the originator of the phrase) at Townhall. He defines the situation much better than I did. Check it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivan Ivanovich</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/09/11/the-significance-of-sarah/comment-page-1/#comment-73658</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivan Ivanovich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 13:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/09/11/the-significance-of-sarah/#comment-73658</guid>
		<description>Yes, Patrick. Even without the full transcript we can see she did OK for a first time out. Reading the full transcript we can see how Gibson was trying to torpedo her with “blizzard of words” and “Bush Doctrine” questions. I couldn’t remember exactly what the Bush doctrine was either, so I went to Wikipedia and read &quot;Scholars identify seven different &quot;Bush Doctrines&quot;&quot;. I&#039;m sure that Gibson knew this and calculated that any response could be used to discredit her with the worn out &quot;Another 4 years of the same!&quot; cry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Patrick. Even without the full transcript we can see she did OK for a first time out. Reading the full transcript we can see how Gibson was trying to torpedo her with “blizzard of words” and “Bush Doctrine” questions. I couldn’t remember exactly what the Bush doctrine was either, so I went to Wikipedia and read &#8220;Scholars identify seven different &#8220;Bush Doctrines&#8221;". I&#8217;m sure that Gibson knew this and calculated that any response could be used to discredit her with the worn out &#8220;Another 4 years of the same!&#8221; cry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phillip Ellis Jackson</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/09/11/the-significance-of-sarah/comment-page-1/#comment-73656</link>
		<dc:creator>Phillip Ellis Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 12:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/09/11/the-significance-of-sarah/#comment-73656</guid>
		<description>Just like commentators claimed that Algore won every debate with Bush in 2000, only to have them admit years later that well, maybe, he didn&#039;t; just like commentators concluded that Reagan was a dolt in office, only to admit years later that he was actually a pretty smart guy;  just like Jimmy Carter was proclaimed as a brilliant thinker and politician while in office, only to see these same commentators cringe today when he opens his mouth, Sarah Palin did &quot;poorly&quot; in her ABC interview.

Do we notice a trend here?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just like commentators claimed that Algore won every debate with Bush in 2000, only to have them admit years later that well, maybe, he didn&#8217;t; just like commentators concluded that Reagan was a dolt in office, only to admit years later that he was actually a pretty smart guy;  just like Jimmy Carter was proclaimed as a brilliant thinker and politician while in office, only to see these same commentators cringe today when he opens his mouth, Sarah Palin did &#8220;poorly&#8221; in her ABC interview.</p>
<p>Do we notice a trend here?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Mulligan</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/09/11/the-significance-of-sarah/comment-page-1/#comment-73652</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Mulligan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 04:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/09/11/the-significance-of-sarah/#comment-73652</guid>
		<description>From the commentary I read, not many people took away the same impression that gentlewomanfarmer did of the Palin interview with &quot;fatherly&quot; Charlie Gibson. Perhaps you&#039;d get a better impression of the governor if you read the transcript of the interview instead of just the televised portion - the transript includes her responses to questioning and full quotations from her previous statements, unlike the televised portion which was edited (ostensibly for &quot;brevity&quot;) to cast the governor&#039;s previous remarks in a false light and make her answers to questions appear in a different-than-intended context. The vice presidential debate will presumably be aired without the benefit of editing by a &quot;fatherly&quot; figure to tell America what he feels we need to hear instead of what the interviewee actually said. &quot;Deer in the headlights&quot; is a dangerous term to throw around for supporters of a presidential candidate who said - in an unedited and and untampered with interview - that the moral, legal, and ethical implications of abortion are &quot;above his pay grade&quot;. Maybe the president is due for a raise?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the commentary I read, not many people took away the same impression that gentlewomanfarmer did of the Palin interview with &#8220;fatherly&#8221; Charlie Gibson. Perhaps you&#8217;d get a better impression of the governor if you read the transcript of the interview instead of just the televised portion &#8211; the transript includes her responses to questioning and full quotations from her previous statements, unlike the televised portion which was edited (ostensibly for &#8220;brevity&#8221;) to cast the governor&#8217;s previous remarks in a false light and make her answers to questions appear in a different-than-intended context. The vice presidential debate will presumably be aired without the benefit of editing by a &#8220;fatherly&#8221; figure to tell America what he feels we need to hear instead of what the interviewee actually said. &#8220;Deer in the headlights&#8221; is a dangerous term to throw around for supporters of a presidential candidate who said &#8211; in an unedited and and untampered with interview &#8211; that the moral, legal, and ethical implications of abortion are &#8220;above his pay grade&#8221;. Maybe the president is due for a raise?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gentlewomanfarmer</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/09/11/the-significance-of-sarah/comment-page-1/#comment-73642</link>
		<dc:creator>gentlewomanfarmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 21:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/09/11/the-significance-of-sarah/#comment-73642</guid>
		<description>This post was obviously written before Governor Palin&#039;s interview with Charles Gibson aired.

That interview is resonating with every working woman who has learned through painful experience that in order to succeed she has to be twice as good as her competition - because it is so readily apparent that Governor Palin is not even half as good as McCain&#039;s other choices were. Will the moderator, too, have to explain the questions to her so that she can engage in the upcoming VP debate?

Governor Palin manifests the &quot;deer in the headlights&quot; look when asked questions by fatherly Charles Gibson; do we really find this to be a positive affirmation of her candidacy? Never has it been more obvious that Governor Palin is being used as a prop, and that she is willing to be used in that way. If she had any self-respect she would step down.

This was a humiliating moment for all women.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post was obviously written before Governor Palin&#8217;s interview with Charles Gibson aired.</p>
<p>That interview is resonating with every working woman who has learned through painful experience that in order to succeed she has to be twice as good as her competition &#8211; because it is so readily apparent that Governor Palin is not even half as good as McCain&#8217;s other choices were. Will the moderator, too, have to explain the questions to her so that she can engage in the upcoming VP debate?</p>
<p>Governor Palin manifests the &#8220;deer in the headlights&#8221; look when asked questions by fatherly Charles Gibson; do we really find this to be a positive affirmation of her candidacy? Never has it been more obvious that Governor Palin is being used as a prop, and that she is willing to be used in that way. If she had any self-respect she would step down.</p>
<p>This was a humiliating moment for all women.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivan Ivanovich</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/09/11/the-significance-of-sarah/comment-page-1/#comment-73634</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivan Ivanovich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 13:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/09/11/the-significance-of-sarah/#comment-73634</guid>
		<description>felix
Why not just write &quot;I&#039;m in the tank for Obama&quot;?

I watched a little of the forum last night. Just enough to see BHO use the imperial WE. Asked about where he was on 9/11 he told how he was driving down Lakeshore Drive in Chicago when he heard it on the radio. So far so good, many of us remember that day. Then he said he got to a TV and watched the action with the smoke rolling out of the towers. Then he spoke about the rescue efforts and said &quot;WE were helping people down the stairs...&quot;
That was it for me! All I could think was &quot;What do you mean WE, kemosabi? You were 800 miles away from NYC!&quot;
I guess he&#039;s not running for POTUS. He&#039;s running for King, Czar, or maybe even Emperor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>felix<br />
Why not just write &#8220;I&#8217;m in the tank for Obama&#8221;?</p>
<p>I watched a little of the forum last night. Just enough to see BHO use the imperial WE. Asked about where he was on 9/11 he told how he was driving down Lakeshore Drive in Chicago when he heard it on the radio. So far so good, many of us remember that day. Then he said he got to a TV and watched the action with the smoke rolling out of the towers. Then he spoke about the rescue efforts and said &#8220;WE were helping people down the stairs&#8230;&#8221;<br />
That was it for me! All I could think was &#8220;What do you mean WE, kemosabi? You were 800 miles away from NYC!&#8221;<br />
I guess he&#8217;s not running for POTUS. He&#8217;s running for King, Czar, or maybe even Emperor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

