I dug up another quote by Sarah Palin and I thought readers should consider just how deeply offensive appeals to God during war time are.
It has been fun watching the Democrats and the media gun for Governor Sarah Palin. And when they dug up that terrible dirt about her claiming our troops fighting in Iraq were doing God's work, I was appalled. So I dug up another quote by Palin and I thought readers should consider just how deeply offensive appeals to God during war time are.
Well, I will tell you how it was. In the pinch of the campaign in Iraq when everybody seemed panic stricken and nobody could tell what was going to happen, oppressed by the gravity of our affairs, I went to my room one day and locked the door and got down on my knees before Almighty God and prayed to Him mightily for victory. I told Him that this war was His war, and our cause His cause, but we could not stand another 9/11 . . . And after that, I don't know how it was, and I cannot explain it, but soon a sweet comfort crept into my soul. The feeling came that God had taken the whole business into His own hands and that things would go right in Iraq . . .
So much for separating God from our war against terrorism! Maybe Jeremy Gerard at Bloomberg News was right when he wrote: “Gibson didn't ask (Palin) if she has any clue about the principle of separation of church and state on which her beloved United States was founded. I wish he had.”
Shame on Sarah Palin! Only one problem. This is not a Sarah Palin quote (sorry for that little act of deception). Substitute the appropriate battles (Gettysburg and Chancellorsville ) and this is Abraham Lincoln, by many considered our greatest president, seeking God’s help and guidance during a difficult time during the Civil War. (And of course we have those on the Left comparing Senator Obama to Jesus, the latest community organizer — and, geez, I thought he was preaching, not getting out the vote . . . oh well.)
Now, that said, let me be perfectly clear. Sarah Palin may not be ready to be president (she has more experience than Lincoln, but then Lincoln wasn’t spared personal attacks either). But is she any less qualified than Barack Obama who heads the ticket for the Democrats? They are both smart, charismatic leaders who, with a little seasoning, could be ready for the presidency in a few years, assuming you agree with them on the issues.
The problem for those supporting Senator Obama is that he is heading up the Democratic ticket and Governor Palin is the Vice Presidential candidate for the Republicans. The person running with the most experience and best equipped to be commander in chief is John McCain. Second most qualified, if you consider years of experience and exposure to international issues, is of course Senator Biden. Should we lobby for a McCain-Biden ticket?
The hysteria being displayed by the liberal-left over Palin is the hysteria of those who sense, rightly or not, power slipping from their grasp. She has a nice quality about her – a real, authentic voice that does not have the slippery feel of the Obama-Clinton style.
People like it. They like McCain for the same reason. The guy is real. He doesn’t duck and weave and bob – he just says it the way he sees it. So does Palin.
But in fairness, Obama has been in the national limelight for more than a year and he has been – to a degree – exposed to the American people. Palin is new on the national stage so it is legitimate to ask questions about her experience, her abilities and her positions on issues.
What is not legitimate is the kind of trash journalism and commentary being practiced by the celebrity/media Left at her expense. What is not acceptable is applying one standard to Palin, and another to Obama and the Democrats. It is a sad day for the Democratic Party and their friends in the media when they are concerned about a 17-year-old girl being pregnant but lionize two former married presidents who used their power to maneuver girls not much older than 17 into situations where they might have gotten pregnant. Please.
Here is the good news. Most Americans, I believe, are capable of seeing through the leftist agenda and getting to the heart of things. At the end of the day, Senator Obama is to the far left on domestic issues, lacks foreign policy experience and savvy and has barely functioned as a U.S. Senator.
Don’t blame Palin, Democrats, because you selected a guy who probably needed another four years. The Republicans chose a soldier and a leader who has been consulting with presidents for nearly 30 years. God willing, Palin will get the time she needs to expand her portfolio of experience and she sure as heck is smart enough and savvy enough to function at the highest levels of our government.
But come November, the presidential candidate for the Democrats will be a man who has spent less time as a functioning member of the Senate than Palin has as an active Governor running a state. American voters will have to judge if they think he is better prepared than McCain; heck, they might even pray about it.








fi 1 122-
Do not want to beat a dead horse here-
I have really enjoyed this exchange. It is often said that someone with a little bit of knowledge is dangerous…
Your original assumption, that YHWH was an attempt to remove all traces of the feminine is incorrect. In Hebrew, the YH is masculine, and the WH is feminine. It is the only Hebrew word that is both masculine and feminine. Your entire "thesis" is based upon a faulty assumption.
Many women are exalted in the biblical text, attractive or not. Your opinion takes a minor detail (ie not worshipping beauty), and stretches it to a ridiculous extreme. Are there people who are obsessed with Gov. Palin? Of course. Just as there are people who are obsessed with Sen Obama, easily to the point of psuedo- idolatry ( an image seemingly ecouraged by the Obama camp). Your failure to note this obvious fact tends to make me agree with Phil-
You have serious women issues.
Phil and Crash. Either I have "serious women issues" or you are both women-seductive-power idolaters in deep trouble with the Most High. Or it may be both. Actually it is most probably that we are just looking at the same thing from two different angles. To an Ishtar Idolater, a Hebrew prophet certainly looked like a man with despicable "women issues". And we all know what the Hebrew prophet thought of the Ishtar idolater.
The problem is that both cannot be right in the long run. Either a society can be built around a feminine-oriented form of spirituality or it cannot. And in the latter case it is the anti-idolatry anti-feminine monotheist who is right, which is what I believe.
Regarding your "YH" + "WH" thesis, Crash, this is obviously pure hot air. Kabalah-like Judaism has always been very fond of that kind of play with words. But it has never yielded more insight than say reading tea leaves or looking at the innards of dead poultry.
YHWH is masculine in all its attributes and behavior. Just think of the "King of Glory" in the Psalms. It is "King" and not "Queen". Moreover, as I said, YHWH is in stark contrast with the other deities of the region in that he is alone while the others most often came in pairs: a male deity and a consort. Hence the condemnation of the "Baals and the Ashtoroths" that we find so often in the OT. Deny that if you want, I don't think it will fool anyone but those who want to be fooled.