<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sarah Palin 2012</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/11/05/sarah-palin-2012/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/11/05/sarah-palin-2012/</link>
	<description>Conservative and Libertarian Intellectual Philosophy and Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:00:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mickey G</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/11/05/sarah-palin-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-74886</link>
		<dc:creator>Mickey G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 22:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/11/05/sarah-palin-2012/#comment-74886</guid>
		<description>Dr Wilson, strange to note comments about Africa knowledge of Palin yet praise of a Harvard graduate who does not know how many states are in the union, states that he will redistribute wealth, and a long list of other unreported or under reported gaffes.  Couple this with the under reporting of the opposing vice president candidate gaffes and corruption and we get a bewildering picture that seems to describe a high level of corruption even before they take office.  Having servied in elective office I prefer courageous representatives that vote their conscience and I cannot stomach cowards voting &quot;present&quot; over 100 times.  Leads me to believe he will be tested and we will find marshmallow not steel in his backbone since he has already shown the yellow flag of cowardice in his legislative behaviour.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr Wilson, strange to note comments about Africa knowledge of Palin yet praise of a Harvard graduate who does not know how many states are in the union, states that he will redistribute wealth, and a long list of other unreported or under reported gaffes.  Couple this with the under reporting of the opposing vice president candidate gaffes and corruption and we get a bewildering picture that seems to describe a high level of corruption even before they take office.  Having servied in elective office I prefer courageous representatives that vote their conscience and I cannot stomach cowards voting &#8220;present&#8221; over 100 times.  Leads me to believe he will be tested and we will find marshmallow not steel in his backbone since he has already shown the yellow flag of cowardice in his legislative behaviour.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DrWilson</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/11/05/sarah-palin-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-74885</link>
		<dc:creator>DrWilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 19:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/11/05/sarah-palin-2012/#comment-74885</guid>
		<description>Anderson, one can certainly argue that intelligence is somewhat subjective. However, your argument that since Jimmy Carter was intelligent and a poor President, intelligence must not required to be a good President, is flawed. 

Intelligence may not guarantee that one will be a good President, but it certainly is a pre-requisite (necessary but not sufficient attribute). 

I would even agree with you that wisdom is more important than smarts (or intelligence as measured by an IQ test). However, a reasonable IQ is required for one to gain wisdom. Wisdom is the product of knowledge and experience. 

Sarah Palin has demonstrated over and over again that she does not have much knowledge, and worse than that, she does not value knowledge. She thinks that winking while delivering one-liners written by someone else is a substitute for understanding and thoughtful consideration of the issues. 

The right wing of the Republican Party likes her because she is an ideologue, a true believer. She shares their narrow worldview wherein many important facts do not matter. More than any public figure I have ever known, her approach can be described a blissful ignorance. She has no idea how rediculous she appears to most of the people in the world.

She would be a disaster as a President for the same reason that George W. Bush was a disaster. She has demonstrated no ability to apply logic and reason to her personal beliefs or behavior. In short, she has no wisdom.

She may be a standard bearer for the radical right wing of the Republican Party, but she will never be elected to national office, because the American people, on balance, do have the wisdom not to elect her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anderson, one can certainly argue that intelligence is somewhat subjective. However, your argument that since Jimmy Carter was intelligent and a poor President, intelligence must not required to be a good President, is flawed. </p>
<p>Intelligence may not guarantee that one will be a good President, but it certainly is a pre-requisite (necessary but not sufficient attribute). </p>
<p>I would even agree with you that wisdom is more important than smarts (or intelligence as measured by an IQ test). However, a reasonable IQ is required for one to gain wisdom. Wisdom is the product of knowledge and experience. </p>
<p>Sarah Palin has demonstrated over and over again that she does not have much knowledge, and worse than that, she does not value knowledge. She thinks that winking while delivering one-liners written by someone else is a substitute for understanding and thoughtful consideration of the issues. </p>
<p>The right wing of the Republican Party likes her because she is an ideologue, a true believer. She shares their narrow worldview wherein many important facts do not matter. More than any public figure I have ever known, her approach can be described a blissful ignorance. She has no idea how rediculous she appears to most of the people in the world.</p>
<p>She would be a disaster as a President for the same reason that George W. Bush was a disaster. She has demonstrated no ability to apply logic and reason to her personal beliefs or behavior. In short, she has no wisdom.</p>
<p>She may be a standard bearer for the radical right wing of the Republican Party, but she will never be elected to national office, because the American people, on balance, do have the wisdom not to elect her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/11/05/sarah-palin-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-74882</link>
		<dc:creator>Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 17:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/11/05/sarah-palin-2012/#comment-74882</guid>
		<description>Igkjr3, did you know that McCain, because of his family, was given the opportunity to return to the states by his captors. He opted to stay behind because his fellow POWs were not given the same opportunity? I&#039;m just wondering how much of the man you ACTUALLY know and how much you gathered from an election campaign which didn&#039;t reflect anything about either candidate?

I&#039;m also wondering where people are getting this idea that he&#039;s ill-tempered. I didn&#039;t see him explode once on TV, but I may have missed it.

DrWilson, you harp too much on intelligence when it is both subjective and, at times, irrelevant. Jimmy Carter was a nuclear engineer, and yet he was one of the worst presidents this country, helping to create both the energy and financial crises that we have now. And for all of Bush&#039;s proclaimed stupidity, he beat two Ivy Leaguers in both of his elections.

&quot;Don&#039;t know about you, but I would like a President who is smarter than I am.&quot; I think everyone is in agreement with you on this one. :P

Though I&#039;ll take wisdom over smarts any day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Igkjr3, did you know that McCain, because of his family, was given the opportunity to return to the states by his captors. He opted to stay behind because his fellow POWs were not given the same opportunity? I&#8217;m just wondering how much of the man you ACTUALLY know and how much you gathered from an election campaign which didn&#8217;t reflect anything about either candidate?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also wondering where people are getting this idea that he&#8217;s ill-tempered. I didn&#8217;t see him explode once on TV, but I may have missed it.</p>
<p>DrWilson, you harp too much on intelligence when it is both subjective and, at times, irrelevant. Jimmy Carter was a nuclear engineer, and yet he was one of the worst presidents this country, helping to create both the energy and financial crises that we have now. And for all of Bush&#8217;s proclaimed stupidity, he beat two Ivy Leaguers in both of his elections.</p>
<p>&#8220;Don&#8217;t know about you, but I would like a President who is smarter than I am.&#8221; I think everyone is in agreement with you on this one. :P</p>
<p>Though I&#8217;ll take wisdom over smarts any day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: igkjr3</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/11/05/sarah-palin-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-74832</link>
		<dc:creator>igkjr3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 17:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/11/05/sarah-palin-2012/#comment-74832</guid>
		<description>&quot;John McCain is indisputably an honorable and noble man.&quot;  I used to believe this, but the campaign convinced me otherwise.  What I took home from the campaign was that McCain is a man with a bad temper who will say almost anything to get elected.  I&#039;m sorry the guy suffered in Vietnam, but that doesn&#039;t make him either honorable or noble.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;John McCain is indisputably an honorable and noble man.&#8221;  I used to believe this, but the campaign convinced me otherwise.  What I took home from the campaign was that McCain is a man with a bad temper who will say almost anything to get elected.  I&#8217;m sorry the guy suffered in Vietnam, but that doesn&#8217;t make him either honorable or noble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DrWilson</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/11/05/sarah-palin-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-74829</link>
		<dc:creator>DrWilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 17:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/11/05/sarah-palin-2012/#comment-74829</guid>
		<description>Come on folks. Palin had to attend four different (not very good) schools just to get a BA in journalism. She thinks Africa is a country and cannot name the countries in North America. She says that living in the state closest to Russia gives her foreign policy experience. She didn&#039;t know what or who Hamas is. While asking for more research into autism, she doesn&#039;t understand that fruit fly research is central to genetics and has made important contributions to understanding autism.
 
She cannot answer general knowledge questions that can be correctly answered by college-bound high school students. (Not kidding here, I asked a dozen or so questions that she could not answer to college bound high school students myself and got the right answers every time.) She apparently does not believe that knowledge is important because her school-age children are not even in school. 

While she may not be stupid, she is at least ignorant. If someone is 44 years old and doesn&#039;t know that Africa is a continent and not a country, or what countries are in North America, then sorry, they are ignorant. Don&#039;t know about you, but I would like a President who is smarter than I am. 

If we want America to continue on the the path to idiocracy, along which the Bush Administation has made so much progress in the last 8 years, then Palin might well be the best we have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come on folks. Palin had to attend four different (not very good) schools just to get a BA in journalism. She thinks Africa is a country and cannot name the countries in North America. She says that living in the state closest to Russia gives her foreign policy experience. She didn&#8217;t know what or who Hamas is. While asking for more research into autism, she doesn&#8217;t understand that fruit fly research is central to genetics and has made important contributions to understanding autism.</p>
<p>She cannot answer general knowledge questions that can be correctly answered by college-bound high school students. (Not kidding here, I asked a dozen or so questions that she could not answer to college bound high school students myself and got the right answers every time.) She apparently does not believe that knowledge is important because her school-age children are not even in school. </p>
<p>While she may not be stupid, she is at least ignorant. If someone is 44 years old and doesn&#8217;t know that Africa is a continent and not a country, or what countries are in North America, then sorry, they are ignorant. Don&#8217;t know about you, but I would like a President who is smarter than I am. </p>
<p>If we want America to continue on the the path to idiocracy, along which the Bush Administation has made so much progress in the last 8 years, then Palin might well be the best we have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mickey G</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/11/05/sarah-palin-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-74828</link>
		<dc:creator>Mickey G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 17:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/11/05/sarah-palin-2012/#comment-74828</guid>
		<description>Anderson, good comments.

It is interesting to me that Palin gets widespread media coverage on what appear to be minor gaffes while the Omessiah doesn&#039;t even know how many states are in the union.  Seems to me that should be on page one but &quot;he just misspoke because he was tired&quot;, or the Biden list of both gaffes and corruption but no coverage. Hmmm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anderson, good comments.</p>
<p>It is interesting to me that Palin gets widespread media coverage on what appear to be minor gaffes while the Omessiah doesn&#8217;t even know how many states are in the union.  Seems to me that should be on page one but &#8220;he just misspoke because he was tired&#8221;, or the Biden list of both gaffes and corruption but no coverage. Hmmm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/11/05/sarah-palin-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-74820</link>
		<dc:creator>Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 14:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/11/05/sarah-palin-2012/#comment-74820</guid>
		<description>&quot;Just picture Palin debating Obama. Well reasoned, fact-based arguments made against endlessly repeated memorized (but barely understood)talking points and winks at the audience.&quot;

I didn&#039;t know that Obama winked at the audience... regardless, I remember hearing something along these lines during both Bush election campaigns, and we know how both turned out.

&quot;Electability&quot; is a nice word for popularity. It is the reason why Democrats lost the last two presidential races, and why the Republicans lost this one. Instead of focusing on someone who represents something, they went with guys who could get elected. Gore on his popularity, Kerry because the other Democratic candidates were less electable, and McCain because he was the farthest thing from the party during a time when the party was doing miserably. If you want to win, you have to be inspirational, not popular. Popularity can come later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Just picture Palin debating Obama. Well reasoned, fact-based arguments made against endlessly repeated memorized (but barely understood)talking points and winks at the audience.&#8221;</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t know that Obama winked at the audience&#8230; regardless, I remember hearing something along these lines during both Bush election campaigns, and we know how both turned out.</p>
<p>&#8220;Electability&#8221; is a nice word for popularity. It is the reason why Democrats lost the last two presidential races, and why the Republicans lost this one. Instead of focusing on someone who represents something, they went with guys who could get elected. Gore on his popularity, Kerry because the other Democratic candidates were less electable, and McCain because he was the farthest thing from the party during a time when the party was doing miserably. If you want to win, you have to be inspirational, not popular. Popularity can come later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonkon</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/11/05/sarah-palin-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-74768</link>
		<dc:creator>jonkon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 20:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/11/05/sarah-palin-2012/#comment-74768</guid>
		<description>You cannot believe the media hype about the &quot;electability&quot; of Romney or Huckabee.  They are being promoted because  their candidacies would be as disasterous as McCain&#039;s and Dole&#039;s.  I view the current smear campaign against Palin as a desperate attempt by Rinosaurs to hold on to power.  Even in 2012, Palin will still have more executive, foreign policy, and commander-in-chief experience than Obama, should the left wing nuts controlling Congress allow him to finish his term.  Furthermore, the media, its credibility already mortally trashed by its overt support of Obama, will not be able to mount the smear campaign against Palin like they did against Goldwater, once Obama delivers on his promises of 15% unemployment and terrorist attacks on our soil.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You cannot believe the media hype about the &#8220;electability&#8221; of Romney or Huckabee.  They are being promoted because  their candidacies would be as disasterous as McCain&#8217;s and Dole&#8217;s.  I view the current smear campaign against Palin as a desperate attempt by Rinosaurs to hold on to power.  Even in 2012, Palin will still have more executive, foreign policy, and commander-in-chief experience than Obama, should the left wing nuts controlling Congress allow him to finish his term.  Furthermore, the media, its credibility already mortally trashed by its overt support of Obama, will not be able to mount the smear campaign against Palin like they did against Goldwater, once Obama delivers on his promises of 15% unemployment and terrorist attacks on our soil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DrWilson</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/11/05/sarah-palin-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-74765</link>
		<dc:creator>DrWilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 19:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/11/05/sarah-palin-2012/#comment-74765</guid>
		<description>Sarah Palin needed no one to smear her. Since the Republican Convention, she has done a more than adequate job on national TV. The rediculous statements and mangled thoughts just kept coming.

Just picture Palin debating Obama. Well reasoned, fact-based arguments made against endlessly repeated memorized (but barely understood)talking points and winks at the audience. 

Again, facts matter. The Democrats have found themselves a smart, even tempered and articulate standerd bearer who can get out the vote. Conservatives better do the same. Sarah Palin is a lot of things. Smart, even tempered and articulate she is not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sarah Palin needed no one to smear her. Since the Republican Convention, she has done a more than adequate job on national TV. The rediculous statements and mangled thoughts just kept coming.</p>
<p>Just picture Palin debating Obama. Well reasoned, fact-based arguments made against endlessly repeated memorized (but barely understood)talking points and winks at the audience. </p>
<p>Again, facts matter. The Democrats have found themselves a smart, even tempered and articulate standerd bearer who can get out the vote. Conservatives better do the same. Sarah Palin is a lot of things. Smart, even tempered and articulate she is not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mountain Man</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/11/05/sarah-palin-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-74762</link>
		<dc:creator>Mountain Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 15:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/11/05/sarah-palin-2012/#comment-74762</guid>
		<description>Paul Begala is a bitter partisan. He loves the smear job done on Palin and thinks that it has been effective enough to negate her popularity. He and you are wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul Begala is a bitter partisan. He loves the smear job done on Palin and thinks that it has been effective enough to negate her popularity. He and you are wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

