We’re Broke, So Let’s Give Our Money to Foreigners
View Comments | Print This Post Print This Post |

by Alan Caruba | November 19th, 2008

For decades the nations of the West have transferred billions of dollars to nations with no evidence of any progress.

“Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress; but then I repeat myself.”
– Mark Twain

Given the talk of President-elect Obama’s possible selection of Senator Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State in his new administration, the likelihood of “change” is growing more distant by the hour.

The Obama administration is going to look very much like the Clinton administration and, if anyone recalls, we spent the 1990s sorting out its many scandals and failures, despite a healthy economy bequeathed by the Reagan years. Clinton finished his term pardoning — among a raft of miscreants, Linda Evans, a former member of the Weatherman terrorist group led by Obama pal, William Ayers.

A raft of insanely liberal legislation is waiting to be foisted on Americans. One up for consideration by the lame duck Congress is S. 2433, otherwise known as the “Global Poverty Act of 2007.”

In his book, The White Man’s Burden: Why the West’s Efforts to Aid the Rest have Done so Much Ill and so Little Good, William Easterly noted that in 2002, “We had the world’s twenty-five most undemocratic government rulers (out of 199 countries the World Bank rated on democracy) get a sum of $9 billion in foreign aid . . . similarly, the world’s most corrupt countries got $9.4 billion in foreign aid.”

Easterly, an expert on such aid efforts, pointed out that, “Since donors understandably don’t want to admit they are dealing with bad governments, diplomatic language in aid agencies becomes an art form. A war is a ‘conflict-related reallocation of resources.’ Aid efforts to deal with homicidal warlords are ‘difficult partnerships.’ Countries whose presidents loot the treasury experience ‘governance issues.’”

It is estimated that at least a billion of the world’s population lives in poverty. Nobody denies it remains widespread, but poverty is solved by maintaining educational systems that ensure literacy and other useful skills, encouraging entrepreneurship, and mostly by ending the corruption that is the hallmark of virtually every nation on the continent of Africa, the distinguishing feature of Middle Eastern nations, and too many others.

For decades the nations of the West have transferred billions of dollars to nations with no evidence of any progress.

The Global Poverty Act proposes to work with what is possibly the most corrupt international institution in the world, the United Nations, as well as other “international organizations, international financial institutions, the governments of developing and developed countries, United States and international nongovernmental organizations, civil society organizations, and other appropriate entities . . ..”

Its expressed purpose is “To require the President to develop and implement a comprehensive strategy to further the United States foreign policy objective of promoting the reduction of global poverty, the elimination of extreme global poverty, and the achievement of the Millennium Development goal of reducing by one-half the proportion of people worldwide between 1990 and 2015, who live on less than $1 a day.”

Its sponsors include Senator Barack Obama and a who’s who of liberal legislators that includes Joe Biden, John Kerry, Diane Feinstein, et al.

Let us understand this. We and the rest of the world are not under attack from Islamofascists because of poverty. This is a movement drawn entirely from the Koran, an alleged holy book that serves as a battle plan for the complete subjugation of the world to Islam. We’re not going to end this conflict by giving the al Qaeda, the Taliban, or the nations in which they flourish a few billion dollars.

As Easterly and many others point out, much if not most of the foreign aid the U.S. has spread around the world has been a complete and utter waste of our financial resources. The poverty it was supposed to end continues and will continue until the recipient nations operate under the rule of law that is not laid down by the dictators who control and loot nations.

The Global Poverty Act of 2007 will further sap the United States of its financial resources at the same time those resources should be applied to the nation’s aging infrastructure and resolve the huge burdens of reckless debt that exist from small towns up the States and the federal government.

This is just the beginning of comparable legislation that will wreck America’s economy, leave us bereft of the energy we require, and ruin the future of “Generation O” along with the rest of us.

Labels: Foreign Affairs, National Defense

ACaruba@aol.com
Visit their website at: http://www.anxietycenter.com/

Read more articles by Alan Caruba on IntellectualConservative.com

 

 

Responses to "We’re Broke, So Let’s Give Our Money to Foreigners"

  1. The Global Poverty Act has been troubling from its inception. From my jaundiced viewpoint foreign aid has been a cause of world problems, not a solution to them. Time to start building fortress America again while developing a Teddy Roosevelt world view.

    But, let's put the poverty act into perspective…we should take 3% of our gross domestic product from our producers (read this as the rich in Obamaonics of course this is so large that the definition may need some subtle adjustment to say those earning over $20,000 per year for a family of 4), cripple our own economy, lose jobs, and open our borders to provide welfare to the world. What a wonderful idea for a wonderful world, welcome to Change we can Trust!

    Comment by Mickey G | November 19, 2008

  2. Yes We Can…

    …Go down the crapper, poorer for the experience.

    Comment by Last Angry Man | November 19, 2008

  3. "…poverty is solved by maintaining educational systems that ensure literacy and other useful skills, encouraging entrepreneurship, and mostly by ending the corruption that is the hallmark of virtually every nation on the continent of Africa, the distinguishing feature of Middle Eastern nations, and too many others." This is an excellent summary. I wonder if the Church and world relief organizations could not stand in the gap and provide some of the skills training and literacy while ending the corruption. It's clear that the illuminati government is not going to be able to communicate or provide these life-changing resources. They want to throw money at the problem and make it go away. Let's elevate the grassroots change on our own–it has already begun in pockets–and negate the need for billions of dollars to be wasted.

    Comment by jeanedcrusader1 | November 19, 2008

  4. Third World countries are poor because government’s legal institutions keep them that way. Private property ownership is the key to successful capitalism.

    Government must keep accurate records of who owns what property so the owners can convert them to capital. Without proof of legal ownership, banks will not lend money. There are hundreds of billions of dollars of property being squatted on by the poor of the world who have no way of converting it to capital. The Mystery of Capital: Why Capitalism Triumphs in the West and Fails Everywhere Else, by Hernando De Soto explains this concept and that, while anyone [in a Third World country] can theoretically acquire property, because of the "red tape," only a few, the insiders, can do it legally in a reasonable amount of time. As an example, he tests the "red tape" of the administration system in his native Lima, Peru by applying for a permit to set up a two-sewing machine garment factory in a Lima shantytown. "Timing the process revealed it took more than 300 days (just to get the permit), working six hours a day, plus 32 times the monthly minimum wage."

    He performed a similar experiment to find out what it took for a person [squatter] living in an extralegal housing settlement "whose permanence the government had already acknowledged, to acquire legal title to a home: To receive approval from only the municipality of Lima – just one of the eleven agencies involved – took 728 bureaucratic steps."

    One humorous incident involved his consulting the Indonesian government that wanted him to find out who lived on what piece of land. So he went out to the farmlands, and he noticed as he passed a farm, the farmer’s dog would bark. As he moved to the next farm, the previous farmer’s dog stopped barking and the next one started. The government didn’t know, but the dogs did.

    According to De Soto's research, capitalism in these countries works for the connected few, but the masses are kept bureaucratically from acquiring legal title to property and thus lack the ability to convert assets to capital. The entrenched oligarchy is thus protected from any competition, and all the foreign aid in the world will not help.

    Comment by sedonaman | November 20, 2008

  5. "Private property ownership is the key to successful capitalism."
    I agree, sedonaman. Thing is, these days, that kind of attitude needs to begin at home.

    Comment by AMAI | November 22, 2008

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.