<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Offensive Conservatives</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/11/21/offensive-conservatives/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/11/21/offensive-conservatives/</link>
	<description>Conservative and Libertarian Intellectual Philosophy and Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:00:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: felix</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/11/21/offensive-conservatives/comment-page-1/#comment-75160</link>
		<dc:creator>felix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 02:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/11/21/offensive-conservatives/#comment-75160</guid>
		<description>&quot;Once a woman &quot;chooses&quot; to engage in conduct leading to the conception of another human being,&quot;

Hey jonkon, FYI, the baby does not spring parthenogenetically from a woman&#039;s forehead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Once a woman &#8220;chooses&#8221; to engage in conduct leading to the conception of another human being,&#8221;</p>
<p>Hey jonkon, FYI, the baby does not spring parthenogenetically from a woman&#8217;s forehead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonkon</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/11/21/offensive-conservatives/comment-page-1/#comment-75151</link>
		<dc:creator>jonkon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 21:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/11/21/offensive-conservatives/#comment-75151</guid>
		<description>I am not into this &quot;pro-life&quot; nonsense.  I am &quot;pro-choice, anti-arbortion.&quot;  Once a woman &quot;chooses&quot; to engage in conduct leading to the conception of another human being, she does not have the right to escape responsibility for that &quot;choice&quot; by &quot;choosing&quot; to murder it for her own convenience.  St. George was anti-dragon, not pro-maiden.  Positive good arises from the active opposition to evil.  The ONLY legitimate reason for government in the first place is to protect peace-loving citizens from the predations of social parasites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not into this &#8220;pro-life&#8221; nonsense.  I am &#8220;pro-choice, anti-arbortion.&#8221;  Once a woman &#8220;chooses&#8221; to engage in conduct leading to the conception of another human being, she does not have the right to escape responsibility for that &#8220;choice&#8221; by &#8220;choosing&#8221; to murder it for her own convenience.  St. George was anti-dragon, not pro-maiden.  Positive good arises from the active opposition to evil.  The ONLY legitimate reason for government in the first place is to protect peace-loving citizens from the predations of social parasites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeanedcrusader1</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/11/21/offensive-conservatives/comment-page-1/#comment-75129</link>
		<dc:creator>jeanedcrusader1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 22:43:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/11/21/offensive-conservatives/#comment-75129</guid>
		<description>The end of your article really makes me think, Lisa. If the religious right had nothing to react to, it would cease to exist. Or they would start digging up even more stuff to keep themselves in a frenzy. It is a horrible flaw to be a reactor in all that you do. Where are the proactive initiatives, where are the creative minds in the religious right? who are the staunch reformers, leading the conservative party to fresh, innovative causes and concerns?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The end of your article really makes me think, Lisa. If the religious right had nothing to react to, it would cease to exist. Or they would start digging up even more stuff to keep themselves in a frenzy. It is a horrible flaw to be a reactor in all that you do. Where are the proactive initiatives, where are the creative minds in the religious right? who are the staunch reformers, leading the conservative party to fresh, innovative causes and concerns?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

