<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Palin, Populism and Potential</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/12/28/palin-populism-and-potential/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/12/28/palin-populism-and-potential/</link>
	<description>Conservative and Libertarian Intellectual Philosophy and Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:00:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Little Big Stories II &#171; toma blog</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/12/28/palin-populism-and-potential/comment-page-1/#comment-75723</link>
		<dc:creator>Little Big Stories II &#171; toma blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 03:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/?p=4942#comment-75723</guid>
		<description>[...] Sarah Palin did not learn much, or get better with time. Or was it Republicans? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sarah Palin did not learn much, or get better with time. Or was it Republicans? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve W.</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/12/28/palin-populism-and-potential/comment-page-1/#comment-75722</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 01:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/?p=4942#comment-75722</guid>
		<description>I was actually in favor of the Palin choice several months before McCain chose her as a running mate.  She seemed solidly conservative, even on social issues, and choosing a woman seemed a good strategic move.  She looked good on paper.

Then I heard her speak.  She was clearly out of her league.  More than the issues, this was the liberal objection to Palin.

Nonetheless, she did have some traction.  Populism was of course one reason.  Huckabee&#039;s warning about merely appealing to country club Republicans was dead-on.  But I&#039;m not sure Huck&#039;s the right person either.  If populism merely means an aw shucks candidate, then I think the American people want someone more presidential.  But if populism means appealing to the what the electorate desires, isn&#039;t this obvious or tautological?  Of course, figuring out what the conservative cluster of planets really wants and finding the right candidate who rests at center mass is the trick.  It&#039;s easy to find one who is center mass of planet libertarian or planet social conservative or planet neocon, but finding center mass of planet earth is not so simple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was actually in favor of the Palin choice several months before McCain chose her as a running mate.  She seemed solidly conservative, even on social issues, and choosing a woman seemed a good strategic move.  She looked good on paper.</p>
<p>Then I heard her speak.  She was clearly out of her league.  More than the issues, this was the liberal objection to Palin.</p>
<p>Nonetheless, she did have some traction.  Populism was of course one reason.  Huckabee&#8217;s warning about merely appealing to country club Republicans was dead-on.  But I&#8217;m not sure Huck&#8217;s the right person either.  If populism merely means an aw shucks candidate, then I think the American people want someone more presidential.  But if populism means appealing to the what the electorate desires, isn&#8217;t this obvious or tautological?  Of course, figuring out what the conservative cluster of planets really wants and finding the right candidate who rests at center mass is the trick.  It&#8217;s easy to find one who is center mass of planet libertarian or planet social conservative or planet neocon, but finding center mass of planet earth is not so simple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/12/28/palin-populism-and-potential/comment-page-1/#comment-75716</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 09:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/?p=4942#comment-75716</guid>
		<description>I would add here that NE corner conservatives have just become a different side of the same coin.  Their disdain for their base is most obvious in the artilces by Peggy Noonan et al.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would add here that NE corner conservatives have just become a different side of the same coin.  Their disdain for their base is most obvious in the artilces by Peggy Noonan et al.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Merlyn</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/12/28/palin-populism-and-potential/comment-page-1/#comment-75710</link>
		<dc:creator>Merlyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 19:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/?p=4942#comment-75710</guid>
		<description>A major problem with Sarah Palin is that she&#039;s pretty.  Compare her with some of the Democrat lovelies: Janet Reno and Donna Shalala come to mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A major problem with Sarah Palin is that she&#8217;s pretty.  Compare her with some of the Democrat lovelies: Janet Reno and Donna Shalala come to mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mountain Man</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/12/28/palin-populism-and-potential/comment-page-1/#comment-75707</link>
		<dc:creator>Mountain Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:44:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/?p=4942#comment-75707</guid>
		<description>Regarding Palin, although you are quite correct in your analysis, it&#039;s much simpler than all that. Palin&#039;s problem with the Left is that she disagrees with them. She doesn&#039;t march lock-step with the Left, so she&#039;s the personification of evil.

That&#039;s all it takes to be attacked by the Left. Disagree with them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding Palin, although you are quite correct in your analysis, it&#8217;s much simpler than all that. Palin&#8217;s problem with the Left is that she disagrees with them. She doesn&#8217;t march lock-step with the Left, so she&#8217;s the personification of evil.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s all it takes to be attacked by the Left. Disagree with them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

