<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Enjoying the Ride Down</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/02/05/enjoying-the-ride-down/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/02/05/enjoying-the-ride-down/</link>
	<description>Conservative and Libertarian Intellectual Philosophy and Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:00:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: REXISWRITE</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/02/05/enjoying-the-ride-down/comment-page-1/#comment-76601</link>
		<dc:creator>REXISWRITE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 16:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/?p=5353#comment-76601</guid>
		<description>&quot;All the king&#039;s horses and all the king&#039;s men can&#039;t put the economy together again.&quot;

We are headed either for default on our debts and bankruptcy as a nation, or something less honorable: a quiet cheapening of the debts we have incurred by inflating and destroying the dollar, robbing our creditors of what we owe them and robbing our own people of the value of what they have earned. And so it has come to this. 
A family man in America&#039;s condition, awash in debt, spending more than he makes, would cut back consumption, find a second job and get out of debt. Or declare bankruptcy, accept the shame and humiliation, change his wasteful ways and start anew.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;All the king&#8217;s horses and all the king&#8217;s men can&#8217;t put the economy together again.&#8221;</p>
<p>We are headed either for default on our debts and bankruptcy as a nation, or something less honorable: a quiet cheapening of the debts we have incurred by inflating and destroying the dollar, robbing our creditors of what we owe them and robbing our own people of the value of what they have earned. And so it has come to this.<br />
A family man in America&#8217;s condition, awash in debt, spending more than he makes, would cut back consumption, find a second job and get out of debt. Or declare bankruptcy, accept the shame and humiliation, change his wasteful ways and start anew.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Last Angry Man</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/02/05/enjoying-the-ride-down/comment-page-1/#comment-76408</link>
		<dc:creator>Last Angry Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 00:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/?p=5353#comment-76408</guid>
		<description>&quot;...unless the republicans or GW bush have somehow succeeded in stealing the gymn key...&quot;

As opposed to the &quot;W&quot; keys.  *heh*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;unless the republicans or GW bush have somehow succeeded in stealing the gymn key&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>As opposed to the &#8220;W&#8221; keys.  *heh*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Alexander</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/02/05/enjoying-the-ride-down/comment-page-1/#comment-76407</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Alexander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 23:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/?p=5353#comment-76407</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s hilarious at this point (&quot;day 11&quot;) of life under the O-man is how the same liberal pundits who utterly lost their heads over the O-man are now desperately trying to save their hero from the reality of, well, politics. I&#039;ve noticed a pattern in their desperation. 

1. Blame it on the Republicans

Frank Rich in Sunday&#039;s NYTimes has taken to threatening republicans. &quot;Having no ideas,&quot; the republicans are going to go into &quot;oblivion&quot; by not (like himself) unquestioningly going along w/ the O-man. Perhaps republicans would have won the White House if Brother Rich were advising them? Rich&#039;s point is a variation of the &quot;it&#039;s all GW Bush&#039;s fault&quot;, but updated since Bush is no longer president. The O-man&#039;s flailings are all the republicans fault for their not realizing the genius of the O-man. 

2. Shock and Surprise

EJ Dionne in today&#039;s Wash. Post now threatens republicans that, the O-man having stumbled in his first two weeks, must now have decided its&#039; &quot;time to take the gloves off.&quot; Apparently Dionne believes that everyone (or at least EJ Dionne) was going to suspend all politics upon the O-man&#039;s ascent and simply go along (as did EJ Dionne) w/ the O-man. EJ says the O-man&#039;s difficulties come from the O-man not realizing that republicans were so nasty (either did EJ Dionne). 

3. &quot;Lincoln and FDR made &#039;great&#039; mistakes&quot;

Another WP columnist whose name escapes me adopted a novel tactic to preserve the O-man&#039;s legend. He argued that since Lincoln and FDR had at first appeared to have &quot;incoherent foreign policy&quot; --that this meant that the O-man might continue to be compared to both on account of his similar &quot;mistakes.&quot; 

4. Loving the O-man&#039;s &#039;pecs&#039;

I think, however, the soundest defense of the O-man came, however, from Chris Matthews. Matthews, host of &quot;Hardball&quot; is famous for declaring that he loved the O-man because of his &quot;pecs&quot; and because (three times in the same interview)he was was &quot;sooooo cool&quot;. This is probably the best defense of the O-man at this point because we are told the O-man continues to regularly work out/play hoops in the White House (unless the republicans or GW bush have somehow succeeded in stealing the gymn key). While one may criticize the O-man for botching 
most everything to this point (except for reinstating international funding of abortion), no doubt his &quot;jump shot&quot; is still killer. Now if it can only be proven that FDR and Lincoln had great jump shots. . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s hilarious at this point (&#8220;day 11&#8243;) of life under the O-man is how the same liberal pundits who utterly lost their heads over the O-man are now desperately trying to save their hero from the reality of, well, politics. I&#8217;ve noticed a pattern in their desperation. </p>
<p>1. Blame it on the Republicans</p>
<p>Frank Rich in Sunday&#8217;s NYTimes has taken to threatening republicans. &#8220;Having no ideas,&#8221; the republicans are going to go into &#8220;oblivion&#8221; by not (like himself) unquestioningly going along w/ the O-man. Perhaps republicans would have won the White House if Brother Rich were advising them? Rich&#8217;s point is a variation of the &#8220;it&#8217;s all GW Bush&#8217;s fault&#8221;, but updated since Bush is no longer president. The O-man&#8217;s flailings are all the republicans fault for their not realizing the genius of the O-man. </p>
<p>2. Shock and Surprise</p>
<p>EJ Dionne in today&#8217;s Wash. Post now threatens republicans that, the O-man having stumbled in his first two weeks, must now have decided its&#8217; &#8220;time to take the gloves off.&#8221; Apparently Dionne believes that everyone (or at least EJ Dionne) was going to suspend all politics upon the O-man&#8217;s ascent and simply go along (as did EJ Dionne) w/ the O-man. EJ says the O-man&#8217;s difficulties come from the O-man not realizing that republicans were so nasty (either did EJ Dionne). </p>
<p>3. &#8220;Lincoln and FDR made &#8216;great&#8217; mistakes&#8221;</p>
<p>Another WP columnist whose name escapes me adopted a novel tactic to preserve the O-man&#8217;s legend. He argued that since Lincoln and FDR had at first appeared to have &#8220;incoherent foreign policy&#8221; &#8211;that this meant that the O-man might continue to be compared to both on account of his similar &#8220;mistakes.&#8221; </p>
<p>4. Loving the O-man&#8217;s &#8216;pecs&#8217;</p>
<p>I think, however, the soundest defense of the O-man came, however, from Chris Matthews. Matthews, host of &#8220;Hardball&#8221; is famous for declaring that he loved the O-man because of his &#8220;pecs&#8221; and because (three times in the same interview)he was was &#8220;sooooo cool&#8221;. This is probably the best defense of the O-man at this point because we are told the O-man continues to regularly work out/play hoops in the White House (unless the republicans or GW bush have somehow succeeded in stealing the gymn key). While one may criticize the O-man for botching<br />
most everything to this point (except for reinstating international funding of abortion), no doubt his &#8220;jump shot&#8221; is still killer. Now if it can only be proven that FDR and Lincoln had great jump shots. . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: From Inwood</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/02/05/enjoying-the-ride-down/comment-page-1/#comment-76405</link>
		<dc:creator>From Inwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 21:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/?p=5353#comment-76405</guid>
		<description>Wait, there’s more Culture of Corruption.

Can&#039;t Any Dem Here Play This Tax Game? 

&quot;A Senate committee today abruptly canceled a session to consider President Obama&#039;s nomination of Rep. Hilda Solis to be labor secretary in the wake of a report saying that her husband yesterday paid about $6,400 to settle tax liens against his business -- including liens that had been outstanding for as long as 16 years.&quot;

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/2009/02/05/solis_senate_session_canceled.html?hpid=topnews</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait, there’s more Culture of Corruption.</p>
<p>Can&#8217;t Any Dem Here Play This Tax Game? </p>
<p>&#8220;A Senate committee today abruptly canceled a session to consider President Obama&#8217;s nomination of Rep. Hilda Solis to be labor secretary in the wake of a report saying that her husband yesterday paid about $6,400 to settle tax liens against his business &#8212; including liens that had been outstanding for as long as 16 years.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/2009/02/05/solis_senate_session_canceled.html?hpid=topnews" rel="nofollow">http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/2009/02/05/solis_senate_session_canceled.html?hpid=topnews</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/02/05/enjoying-the-ride-down/comment-page-1/#comment-76402</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 17:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/?p=5353#comment-76402</guid>
		<description>&quot;Save us FROM&quot; a nutcase SCJ...

Further: the press collaboration with the Obama campaign, and in particular the smearing of Sarah Palin, need to be thoroughly documented, point by point, and aired so that&#039;s embedded in the public consciousness by 2012.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Save us FROM&#8221; a nutcase SCJ&#8230;</p>
<p>Further: the press collaboration with the Obama campaign, and in particular the smearing of Sarah Palin, need to be thoroughly documented, point by point, and aired so that&#8217;s embedded in the public consciousness by 2012.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/02/05/enjoying-the-ride-down/comment-page-1/#comment-76401</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 17:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/?p=5353#comment-76401</guid>
		<description>IF we can focus on individual States, we won&#039;t need Obama to screw up. We only need your Congressman and Senator to screw up. If we DON&#039;T focus locally, your Congressman and Senator will ride Obama&#039;s coattails no matter what he or she does. People won&#039;t even bother to know the issues or the opposition-they&#039;ll just flick the &quot;D&quot; lever.

And a sweep isn&#039;t necessary. Much can be gained just by having the Democrats hear our footsteps - which just might save us a nutcase Supreme Court Justice for the next 25 years. Two Senate seats puts us back into filibuster territory; five or six makes us RINO-proof and/or encourages the Blue Dog Dems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IF we can focus on individual States, we won&#8217;t need Obama to screw up. We only need your Congressman and Senator to screw up. If we DON&#8217;T focus locally, your Congressman and Senator will ride Obama&#8217;s coattails no matter what he or she does. People won&#8217;t even bother to know the issues or the opposition-they&#8217;ll just flick the &#8220;D&#8221; lever.</p>
<p>And a sweep isn&#8217;t necessary. Much can be gained just by having the Democrats hear our footsteps &#8211; which just might save us a nutcase Supreme Court Justice for the next 25 years. Two Senate seats puts us back into filibuster territory; five or six makes us RINO-proof and/or encourages the Blue Dog Dems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Last Angry Man</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/02/05/enjoying-the-ride-down/comment-page-1/#comment-76399</link>
		<dc:creator>Last Angry Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 16:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/?p=5353#comment-76399</guid>
		<description>The question is, will Obama screw up enough between now and, say, a year from now, setting up a possible Republican sweep in 2010?  We all know how notoriously fickle voters as a group can be, and if they become fed up enough with constant errors, gaffes, inability to solve problems, and so on, they might just turn on the Democrats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question is, will Obama screw up enough between now and, say, a year from now, setting up a possible Republican sweep in 2010?  We all know how notoriously fickle voters as a group can be, and if they become fed up enough with constant errors, gaffes, inability to solve problems, and so on, they might just turn on the Democrats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: From Inwood</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/02/05/enjoying-the-ride-down/comment-page-1/#comment-76398</link>
		<dc:creator>From Inwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 16:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/?p=5353#comment-76398</guid>
		<description>Now here&#039;s a great idea:
 
Audit Them All And Make Results Public!

http://www.dcexaminer.com/opinion/columns/MarkTapscott/Audit-them-all-and-make-the-results-public39103437.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now here&#8217;s a great idea:</p>
<p>Audit Them All And Make Results Public!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dcexaminer.com/opinion/columns/MarkTapscott/Audit-them-all-and-make-the-results-public39103437.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.dcexaminer.com/opinion/columns/MarkTapscott/Audit-them-all-and-make-the-results-public39103437.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: From Inwood</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/02/05/enjoying-the-ride-down/comment-page-1/#comment-76397</link>
		<dc:creator>From Inwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 16:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/?p=5353#comment-76397</guid>
		<description>Now for a contrary opinion to your negativity: 

&quot;Reporter jumps ropeline after signing&quot;

Report doesn’t indicate whether it was Olbermann or Matthews. 

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0209/18429.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now for a contrary opinion to your negativity: </p>
<p>&#8220;Reporter jumps ropeline after signing&#8221;</p>
<p>Report doesn’t indicate whether it was Olbermann or Matthews. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0209/18429.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0209/18429.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: From Inwood</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/02/05/enjoying-the-ride-down/comment-page-1/#comment-76396</link>
		<dc:creator>From Inwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 15:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/?p=5353#comment-76396</guid>
		<description>P

There&#039;s really nothing substantive that I can add to what you&#039;ve said &amp; said well.

I would note that Obama seemed more Presidential in the lame-duck period between The Election &amp; The Investiture, OOPS, Inauguration. As Princess Caroline might say, you know, when you actually have to, you know, govern, it&#039;s, um, hard.

And his drinking-the-Kool-Aid supporters will say &quot;Give Obama a chance.&quot; We have &amp; he&#039;s been found wanting. 

But we knew that would be the result before the Election. 

And I agree with Todd. Many people will still vote Dem in Senate &amp; House Election 2010 because, well, you know, because, um....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P</p>
<p>There&#8217;s really nothing substantive that I can add to what you&#8217;ve said &amp; said well.</p>
<p>I would note that Obama seemed more Presidential in the lame-duck period between The Election &amp; The Investiture, OOPS, Inauguration. As Princess Caroline might say, you know, when you actually have to, you know, govern, it&#8217;s, um, hard.</p>
<p>And his drinking-the-Kool-Aid supporters will say &#8220;Give Obama a chance.&#8221; We have &amp; he&#8217;s been found wanting. </p>
<p>But we knew that would be the result before the Election. </p>
<p>And I agree with Todd. Many people will still vote Dem in Senate &amp; House Election 2010 because, well, you know, because, um&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

