<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Would Harvey Milk Have Opposed Gay Marriage?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/02/19/would-harvey-milk-have-opposed-gay-marriage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/02/19/would-harvey-milk-have-opposed-gay-marriage/</link>
	<description>Conservative and Libertarian Intellectual Philosophy and Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:00:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Mulligan</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/02/19/would-harvey-milk-have-opposed-gay-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-76688</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Mulligan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 02:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/?p=5446#comment-76688</guid>
		<description>It is indeed difficult to conceive that an ideologue with a sainted cause wouldn&#039;t want to pilot the bandwagon to co-opt a religious institution that has already been co-opted by the state on the assumption that marriage is a non-articulated right - and a fundamental human right at that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is indeed difficult to conceive that an ideologue with a sainted cause wouldn&#8217;t want to pilot the bandwagon to co-opt a religious institution that has already been co-opted by the state on the assumption that marriage is a non-articulated right &#8211; and a fundamental human right at that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aybeeNY</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/02/19/would-harvey-milk-have-opposed-gay-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-76682</link>
		<dc:creator>aybeeNY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 18:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/?p=5446#comment-76682</guid>
		<description>While Milk himself may not have chosen to marry, it is inconceivable that he would oppose others&#039; rights to do so based on their homosexuality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While Milk himself may not have chosen to marry, it is inconceivable that he would oppose others&#8217; rights to do so based on their homosexuality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivan Ivanovich</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/02/19/would-harvey-milk-have-opposed-gay-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-76678</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivan Ivanovich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:26:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/?p=5446#comment-76678</guid>
		<description>My vote goes to Clint Eastwood for Grand Torino.

What Sullivan should have written was &quot;marriage is very hard for men, straight or gay.&quot; At least men in a gay marriage don&#039;t have to worry about child support and it&#039;s first cousin Alimony. In a heterosexual marriage &quot;No Fault&quot; becomes &quot;Man&#039;s Fault&quot; and if he objects he becomes a &quot;Deadbeat&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My vote goes to Clint Eastwood for Grand Torino.</p>
<p>What Sullivan should have written was &#8220;marriage is very hard for men, straight or gay.&#8221; At least men in a gay marriage don&#8217;t have to worry about child support and it&#8217;s first cousin Alimony. In a heterosexual marriage &#8220;No Fault&#8221; becomes &#8220;Man&#8217;s Fault&#8221; and if he objects he becomes a &#8220;Deadbeat&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

