<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama Gunning for the Second Amendment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/03/18/obama-gunning-for-the-second-amendment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/03/18/obama-gunning-for-the-second-amendment/</link>
	<description>Conservative and Libertarian Intellectual Philosophy and Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:00:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mountain Man</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/03/18/obama-gunning-for-the-second-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-77070</link>
		<dc:creator>Mountain Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 15:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/03/18/obama-gunning-for-the-second-amendment/#comment-77070</guid>
		<description>Ok, I&#039;ll bite. What has the 4th amendment got to do with anything, and how did George himself violate it?

&quot;The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, I&#8217;ll bite. What has the 4th amendment got to do with anything, and how did George himself violate it?</p>
<p>&#8220;The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mickey G</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/03/18/obama-gunning-for-the-second-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-77069</link>
		<dc:creator>Mickey G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 15:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/03/18/obama-gunning-for-the-second-amendment/#comment-77069</guid>
		<description>As usual the &quot;progressives&quot; seeking to make the streets safer for the criminals.  The rationale of gun control used boggles the mind.  Not only is it illogical, it does not work, witness the most recent experiment in Australia where the total ban spawned an increase in gun related crimes.

The history of the second amendment is one aimed at making sure that the government never becomes so oppressive that citizens have to take action.  An armed citizenry is a safe citizenry.

Of course, a government that is taking serious steps toward oppression has a vested interest in making sure that the citizens are not armed, otherwise they might take steps to reconstitute the government in its correct configuration instead of the bloated socialist entity it has become.

I am further amused at some of the other areas they attack.  Semi-automatic shotguns will be targeted as an assault weapon.  Obviously the people proposing this ban know nothing about weapons and rate of fire.  If you doubt this take your favorite 12 guage automatic out along with your favorite pump 12 guage and run fire tests to see which one delivers more rounds per minute.  you will be surprised (or maybe not surprised) to find that, in most cases, the pump will outperform the semi-automatic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As usual the &#8220;progressives&#8221; seeking to make the streets safer for the criminals.  The rationale of gun control used boggles the mind.  Not only is it illogical, it does not work, witness the most recent experiment in Australia where the total ban spawned an increase in gun related crimes.</p>
<p>The history of the second amendment is one aimed at making sure that the government never becomes so oppressive that citizens have to take action.  An armed citizenry is a safe citizenry.</p>
<p>Of course, a government that is taking serious steps toward oppression has a vested interest in making sure that the citizens are not armed, otherwise they might take steps to reconstitute the government in its correct configuration instead of the bloated socialist entity it has become.</p>
<p>I am further amused at some of the other areas they attack.  Semi-automatic shotguns will be targeted as an assault weapon.  Obviously the people proposing this ban know nothing about weapons and rate of fire.  If you doubt this take your favorite 12 guage automatic out along with your favorite pump 12 guage and run fire tests to see which one delivers more rounds per minute.  you will be surprised (or maybe not surprised) to find that, in most cases, the pump will outperform the semi-automatic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Mulligan</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/03/18/obama-gunning-for-the-second-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-77067</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Mulligan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 06:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/03/18/obama-gunning-for-the-second-amendment/#comment-77067</guid>
		<description>&quot;Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phillip Ellis Jackson</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/03/18/obama-gunning-for-the-second-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-77066</link>
		<dc:creator>Phillip Ellis Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 18:47:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/03/18/obama-gunning-for-the-second-amendment/#comment-77066</guid>
		<description>&quot;Sophistry disguised as analysis is still sophistry&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Sophistry disguised as analysis is still sophistry&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raymond Ingles</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/03/18/obama-gunning-for-the-second-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-77064</link>
		<dc:creator>Raymond Ingles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 17:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/03/18/obama-gunning-for-the-second-amendment/#comment-77064</guid>
		<description>&quot;If George can take your 4th amendment, Obama can take your 2nd.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If George can take your 4th amendment, Obama can take your 2nd.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

