<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We Need Something Stronger than Steele</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/03/20/we-need-something-stronger-than-steele/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/03/20/we-need-something-stronger-than-steele/</link>
	<description>Conservative and Libertarian Intellectual Philosophy and Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:00:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: russellshih</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/03/20/we-need-something-stronger-than-steele/comment-page-1/#comment-77105</link>
		<dc:creator>russellshih</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 16:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/?p=5618#comment-77105</guid>
		<description>Steele is too nice of person for the role he know has. The job call for a tough nail-biter type. Steele may get better with time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steele is too nice of person for the role he know has. The job call for a tough nail-biter type. Steele may get better with time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: exercion</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/03/20/we-need-something-stronger-than-steele/comment-page-1/#comment-77078</link>
		<dc:creator>exercion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 01:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/?p=5618#comment-77078</guid>
		<description>Mr. Steele is a symptom of the problem, not the cause. My question is how to go about getting rid of the group of people who elected him to his position, in the belief that he is what is needed to guide the Republican Party. The party now has all the relevance of the Whig Party. And these &quot;powers-that-be&quot; think that, rather than take the results of picking two moderate to liberal Presidential candidates and of not standing up for conservative small government principles which has cost control of Congress as indicative of a major policy problem, we need even more liberal, mushy, faux-leadership. 

I can understand from this little episode why I have never heard beck from Mr. Steele. He has an email address on the RNC website, so I wrote asking what the Party was going to do with RINO&#039;s specifically the three traitors in the Senate who helped sell our country and culture down the river to please their fellow liberals and get nice-ish press coverage. Given that he now has shown he fits the same mold, I can understand the lack of any reply to my question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Steele is a symptom of the problem, not the cause. My question is how to go about getting rid of the group of people who elected him to his position, in the belief that he is what is needed to guide the Republican Party. The party now has all the relevance of the Whig Party. And these &#8220;powers-that-be&#8221; think that, rather than take the results of picking two moderate to liberal Presidential candidates and of not standing up for conservative small government principles which has cost control of Congress as indicative of a major policy problem, we need even more liberal, mushy, faux-leadership. </p>
<p>I can understand from this little episode why I have never heard beck from Mr. Steele. He has an email address on the RNC website, so I wrote asking what the Party was going to do with RINO&#8217;s specifically the three traitors in the Senate who helped sell our country and culture down the river to please their fellow liberals and get nice-ish press coverage. Given that he now has shown he fits the same mold, I can understand the lack of any reply to my question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivan Ivanovich</title>
		<link>http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2009/03/20/we-need-something-stronger-than-steele/comment-page-1/#comment-77074</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivan Ivanovich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 12:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intellectualconservative.com/?p=5618#comment-77074</guid>
		<description>For me it&#039;s too early to make a judgement on Steele, but thank you for your comments. 
I especialy liked your paranthetical:(I also wouldn&#039;t know the term &quot;aficionado&quot;). 
And you hit the nail with: &quot;Students would be better off using 60-year-old books.&quot; I would go back even further to the 1850&#039;s for Moby Dick, Uncle Tom&#039;s Cabin, and later Brother&#039;s Karamazov. I wonder if Mr. Steele has read any of them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For me it&#8217;s too early to make a judgement on Steele, but thank you for your comments.<br />
I especialy liked your paranthetical:(I also wouldn&#8217;t know the term &#8220;aficionado&#8221;).<br />
And you hit the nail with: &#8220;Students would be better off using 60-year-old books.&#8221; I would go back even further to the 1850&#8242;s for Moby Dick, Uncle Tom&#8217;s Cabin, and later Brother&#8217;s Karamazov. I wonder if Mr. Steele has read any of them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

