A substantial contingent of Democrats seems to love passenger-rail subsidies for reasons that have little or nothing to do with pork for their friends.
The headline reads "Obama's Rail Plan Speeds Ahead," and the article explains that President Obama has "unveiled his plan to develop a high-speed passenger rail (HSR) system in the United States." These "specifics" are evidently not actually very specific, however, because reporter Bruce Watson tells us only that the plan is three-fold: "initially, it will pour investment into infrastructure upgrades that have been approved but not yet funded. Later, it will fund high-speed rail planning and, subsequently, construction. In the process, it will also seek to improve rail service along existing lines, increasing the quality of current rail service and laying the track (as it were) for faster, more efficient rail in the future."
Watson spends the rest of his article rhapsodizing about the glorious possibility that the Obama administration will succeed in "changing American patterns of behavior," not simply by improving rail transportation, but also, along the same lines, by establishing "a strong moral counterbalance to the 'greed is good' ethos that has ruled much of the last 28 years." You would have trouble making up this stuff.
What are progressives thinking? If I prefer automobile transportation to taking a train, they condemn me for my greed. Their preference for taxing people and pouring the money into economically wasteful expenditures for rail facilities, however, they laud as the very heart and soul of public-spiritedness.
AMTRAK lives on subsidies; always has, always will. Americans have limited demand for passenger-train services. Nearly everyone prefers to use a personal automobile, for all sorts of good reasons, including privacy, flexibility, and convenience. None of this is news. Transportation economists have been documenting it in study after study for decades.
Yet the leftists of this country at some point – I'm not sure exactly when it happened – fell head over heels in ideological love with trains. I lived for many years in the Seattle area, where traditional religion does not rank very high with the bulk of the population, but devotion to "light rail" serves as a perfect substitute for belief in a higher power. For decades, the Seattle leftists worked to gain voter approval of their beloved light rail system. Finally they succeeded, and the people of Seattle are now getting the "benefits" of this democratic boondoggle good and hard.
Republicans dish out subsidies for perfectly understandable reasons: they wish to enrich their pals in the corporate sector at public expense. Although I do not rule out similar motives among Democrats, a substantial contingent of Democrats seems to love passenger-rail subsidies for reasons that have little or nothing to do with pork for their friends. As the article I quoted earlier suggests, they view rail-over-road as a religious matter: car = evil; train = virtuous. Reasoning with them is as futile as reasoning with any religious zealot. They simply know they are on the side of the angels.
I suspect that someone has written a book about this curious linkage of ideology and technology. If someone hasn't written such a book, plenty of material surely awaits its interpreter. A cultural anthropologist might be best qualified for the task.
Republished with permission from the Independent Institute.
Other than the obvious – that the railroads are very heavily unionized? Give the railroads more control over our economy, and the unions gain more control.
That and the fact that “progressives” still like choo-choos.
A large portion of the progressive infatuation with light rail is a variation of the “build it and they will come’; or to be more accurate, ‘build it and then move them there.”
There are several reasons that progressives demand light rail.
• Passenger rail is a more efficient method of moving people
• Passenger rail requires large population densities in order to be ‘profitable’.
• Passenger rail, through the use of scheduling, allows for a higher degree of control over a population
Passenger rail is one of the lynch pins of the new utopia. As is ‘cap-and-trade’ and artificial inflation of energy prices in general. Let’s imagine exactly where all this is heading.
As energy prices become more expensive, it becomes more sensible to ‘create’ larger population centers. One should review the ‘rewilding’ project touted by the environmentalists. As more and more land is deliberately set aside for nature’s animals, and larger corridors are provided for these same animals to migrate from one preserve to another; the amount of land set aside for humans to exist on gets smaller. The plan is that within a generation, over 80% of the arable land within the continental US will be designated as nature preserves not accessible, nor developable, by humans.
Such a designation forces the creation of ‘human settlement areas’ that are basically high density population centers scattered about the US. Under these conditions light rail for transportation within and between these areas becomes a requirement. For example, Harry Reid’s ‘earmark’ for light rail between LA and Las Vegas. These two cities are unlikely to disappear, but in their new configuration such transportation between these two centers will be required.
As this, and all future ‘progressive’ administrations will push all these combined projects;
• Artificially inflating the price of gasoline until it is unaffordable to the average citizen.
• Restricting habitation & development by humans to limited established areas.
• Building high density population centers to better keep ‘control’ over the US population.
• Returning the bulk of the land to the environmentalist’s definition of ‘pristine’.
• Severely curtailing the environmental impact of the population.
• Achieving ease in the mandating of further restrictions over;
Energy consumption per person
Dietary intake
‘Approved’ employment opportunities
‘Approved’ political constructs
‘Approved’ social constructs
Controlled access to health care.
Mandatory population control
Mandatory euthanasia
When viewed through this lens; light rail is just one more cog in the wheel of the ‘New World Order’ utopian vision that the progressives have for all future generations. Remember the following slogans; ‘Soilent Green is made out of people (from the movie), and “Renew!” (from the movie Logan’s Run).