The Palestinians will not be satisfied until the state of Palestine supplants the State of Israel and every last Jew is gone.
If only Israel.
I cannot tell you how many times I have heard a sentence begin with these three words over the years, especially where it concerns Jewish settlements.
If only Israel dismantled the settlements then peace would reign in the Middle East.
President Obama not only buys into this line of reasoning lock, stock and barrel, he believes the settlements themselves are illegitimate. As he told an audience in Cairo last week:
Israelis must acknowledge that just as Israel's right to exist cannot be denied, neither can Palestine's. The United States does not accept the legitimacy of continued Israeli settlements. This construction violates previous agreements and undermines efforts to achieve peace. It is time for these settlements to stop.
So while the aspirations of Palestinian terrorists are legitimate the aspirations of law-abiding Jewish settlers are not.
But what Obama wants Obama gets. In Obama's world the settlements are a nuisance. Once they are dismantled then flowers will bloom from the desert, the Mediterranean Sea will rise and the Egyptian pyramids will gaze upon him with wonder. But if President Obama honestly believes the dismantling of Jewish settlements will suddenly bring about peace then he is a bigger fool then even I could have imagined. Should this come to pass President Obama will find out the dismantling of settlements won't dismantle the hatred of Israel.
Western liberal apologists for the Palestinians tell us they are suffering. Insufferable would be a more apt description. Their grievances are never-ending and it will certainly not stop with the dismantling of Jewish settlements.
There is the matter of the security fence. When the settlements are gone we will hear Palestinians compare the security fence to the Berlin Wall. Never mind the Berlin Wall kept people in East Germany while the security fence keeps suicide bombers out of Israel. But to liberals in the West, the security fence is an "apartheid wall." If only Israel tore it down then all would be well. Or would it?
There is also the matter of Jerusalem. Not merely East Jerusalem but all of Jerusalem including the Old City. The Palestinians have this notion that Jews have no claim to Jerusalem. Dr. Tayseer Al-Tamimi, Chief Justice of the Shari'a courts in the Palestinian Authority, said, "Jerusalem is the religious, political and spiritual capital of Palestine – the Jews have no right to it." This is the same Tayseer Al-Tamimi who accused Jews of murdering women, children and the elderly in the presence of Pope Benedict XVI during his visit to Israel last month. If Palestinians aren't prepared to include Israel on their maps what makes anyone think they would want to actually live next to Israel? But to liberals in the West, by not permitting the Palestinians to have Jerusalem as their capital Israel is practicing intolerance. If only Israel gave up Jerusalem all would be well. Or would it?
It's not like Israel hasn't dismantled settlements before. Maybe President Obama has a short memory or perhaps just a selective one. For the record, Israel evacuated all of its settlements in the Gaza Strip during their unilateral withdrawal in August 2005. Gaza is Judenrein. One would think that might have brought Israel some good will amongst the Palestinians. Instead, Israel was rewarded with rocket attacks and the kidnapping of Corporal Gilad Shalit. Can Israel expect more of the same when it is compelled to evacuate its settlements in the West Bank? It's funny how President Obama demands the end of Jewish settlements but doesn't demand the release of Corporal Shalit by the Palestinians. But pressuring the Palestinians doesn't buy Obama goodwill in the Muslim world. Besides it's so much easier to blame Israel.
So what will happen to the land once settled by Jews? It will become unsettled, of course. When settlers were forced to evacuate Gaza, greenhouses that had fed families and provided a viable economy were turned to rubble by Palestinian looters while depriving other Palestinians of work.
The truth is that Israel could dismantle every last outpost, tear down the security fence and give up Jerusalem and for Palestinians it would be as if nothing happened. As long as there is an Israel that exists in any form there will still be Palestinian grievances of one kind or another. They would find something to be angry about. Meanwhile, liberals in the West would say, "If only Israel wasn't Jewish." As far as the Palestinians are concerned all of Israel is a Jewish settlement. The Palestinians will not be satisfied until the state of Palestine supplants the State of Israel and every last Jew is gone.
Mr Goldstein,
your comments are based on your own bias. How do you expect us to give you any credits when your one in every two words you write is an adjective? Of course, you choose the most derogatory ones to refer to your opponents, while indulging in self elegy to refer the party you defend! Please be more consistent than the diatribes you expose.
If only Israel, is contrasted by the people who take the oath, "Never again!" Israel will always be a thorn in the side of the Left or the one without a moral compass of Absolutes.
The issue is a religious issue and will never be settle with a political descision. Israel will always exist. In a small aritcle written as a footnote in the early 1930's – Israel will never regain control of the Land and never again be a Nation.
Looking back in History, Israel was promised the Land, and took the Land. Then was dispossesed and subsequently repossessed the Land. Then was dispossesed and finally repossessed the in 1948 – truly an amazing national phenomina in the annals of the Nations in History.
Those in History who have opposed Israel have paid a terrible price. Those who have supported Israel have been favored in a supernatural way. Look at Europe and the Papa Nation to the North, look at Spain during the Inquisition and subsequently, look at Italy during the plagues and after.
The Western World benefitted by annihilating the intense purging of Europe of the Jew. It is a clear historical warning' "leave my people alone."
The antagonism of the Left and others who will remain nameless, stems from their passion to establish a World Order (occassionally we hear this in the media) and that Israel stands as a symbol in reality that Universals and Moral Absolutes will hold them accountable in the "final accounting." (Not connected in any way to the 'final solution')
You write well and set the concepts in great clarity -thanks
Mr Swanson,
your historical knowledge is poor to say the least. The advent of Nazisrael may be an "amazing national phenomina" (sic) only the anals of your family.
"Intellectual Conservative is a contradiction, but Foolish Conservative is a pleonasm."
Well said but I need to remind you that my last name is an indication of my inability to reason well. In the family of my birth it seems to be more than a humorous statement,"there ain't nothin but sawdust up there anyway."
Probably not as bad as you think. But if would like the exact dates of the In and Out stuff, pick up an ancient history book and read the thing.
History books have been redacted in the past 45 years with wrong dating to accomplish the agenda of the Left.
Yep, you're right, the survivial and birth of my family is an amazing thing. I thought I should give a smart answer to your quips, but couldn't think of anything smart, not even stupid. Thanks for the reminder to study harder.
Against my better judgment I will speak/write a true truth which you may not understand, "I will pray you may be able to see beyond the material world matrix and walk in great fellowship with Jesus Christ."
If you would like to insult me, have at it, you are obviously not the professional you may think. Not much
different than the rocks, spit, and other stuff of the 60's. Go for it.
Again, on an intellectual level, when a man walks in the street and you call him to a gun fight, don't stand there with a pocket knife in your hand." Having been feminized you may not really understand that standing in the pseudo-intellectual circle is a worse death than purgatory – (PS. you ought to see the movie::grins::) – Grow up an do your home work!
I am amazed that a historical record would upset you so much, but of course we must not drift into psycho-babble.
Hope you have a better day.
NOooo. I was about to add a smart quip but lack the intelligence to frame it right.
Have a good one.
Dale
Mr Swanson,
I do not know how to put it to you, but you seem to be a religious fanatic not much different than mad islamists or rabid jews. You have been fooled by your pastor, priest, whatever you call your congregation leader. Give him the money, he´ll get the great imaginary friend, aka god, to help you. In fact your belief doesn't bother me as long as you do not bring it as political argument. The world is lay, and justice should be based only in facts and reason. If you need to be bribed with paradise, with or without young virgins awaiting for you, to endeavour into justice and good deeds, then, maybe, you are not the good fellow you think you are!
"Intellectual Conservative is a contradiction, but Foolish Conservative is a pleonasm."
Like I mentioned earlier, my stupidity is attributed in the culture of my birth nation.
Since I don't have any money, I won't be able to connect to the imaqinary friend in the sky.
You obviously haven't done your home work to examine Justice without morality and only rationalism to be the driving force. The result when you live without Universals is to survive by being in the ruling class and quietly remain stupid (not an insulting word – so if you have a 6K
page dictionary look up the varied useage and see if you can figure it out).
The final arbiter in Justice for the rationalist is the consensus of something. There is no moral base which transcends the use of law and is its restraint. Go along glibly complacent about the inherent destructive character of the ruling elite and hope like the dickens (not the writer) you are not ever the object of their displeasure.
Be careful you don't smoke the wrong pipe. Ya outa go back and read the lit on the belief systems of the writers – our Const – and find their consensus base. My suggestion is you do a little more in-depth reading.
Hope you don't find this pleonastically hard for you.
The pseudo elite intellectuals when confronted usually graduate up to a garden rake when called into the street for a gun fight. Target practice is more fun and less fatal.
When in the mountains the man can sit about the fire and jaw without burying all the other campers when you only take target practice.
What is this thing about sex in paradise? You need to give little more tought on insults. Perhaps go back to your mentor for more mentoring – not a really cogent insult. At least get your religions strait – opps we live near the water.
Be copacetic – opps – not supposed to be an intelligent communicator of ideas considering my background. Don't want to "blow my cover."
By the way – I don't have a political persuasion. Now with disconnects in your mental grid get rehooked maybe you can say something a little more precise about my belief system and the insults, sarcasm might be a little more painful.
Mr Swanson,
you are wrong when you assert that there is only moral with religion. English law is based on morals and customs, and has the advantage to adapt itself to man´s evolution from time to time. I am not the kind of person who judges people from the past with the morals of today. I do condescend they did not have the very knowledge, that they, through their own life experience, helped us to have today! Despite my being a materialist, I do not oppose anyone following a religion, if it comforts them, and if it does not interfere nor attract any advantage from the society, as for example being exempt from taxes. Now going back to the issue of the main text, one can affirm that Nazisrael is an aberration for its establishment was the victory of superstition over fact and reason.
I wish I could get the religions straight, but that would mean their extinction!
One more question, please do not get offended: Is English you first language? It is not mine, (and I apologise for any harm I may inflict in the tongue of the bard) but it seems to me that your sentences are written in an order that is not English, or, maybe, just lack punctuation marks (commas, semicolons, etc), let alone the many spelling errors that I will condescend as only typing mistakes.
"Intellectual Conservative is a contradiction, but Foolish Conservative is a pleonasm."
I, for one, am greatly comforted by the fact that Guillaume does not oppose anyone "following a religion". People like him who think real good and understand that only liberals can be intellectual like he has been in presenting his position need to tell us all the things we need to know.
So, listen up all you Nazisraelis. Guillaume knows what he's talking about when he talks about what he knows what he's talking about, or something like that anyway. I mean, he even knows how to use the word “pleonasm" to eschew obfuscation in communicating a platitudinous banality when English isn’t even his own language! How smart is that?!?
Man, the level of discourse from the Left just keeps dazzling us with their inspired insipidity. Talking about facts over reason! Who can argue with that?
I have a lot to do this evening. Will try to make a little more sense in the writing of sentences. Thanks for the corrections. But as you know, being a dunderhead, words don't flow as well as with the erudite.
The revolt of the English people which sent them to the North American Continent and their eventual revolt from England was "Rex Lex".
Who determines a Moral Imperative? How can Time + Space + Chance produce Morality? Morality is then an ever changing code of right and wrong determined by the ruling elite. Whatever the evolution of thought produces becomes the standard which is enforced by the ruling class through their laws. The violator is punished by random thought which has been written into the moral imperative. In the language of the street, "hey dude, da man ain't got no goods to give, so da dude gotta split". Bad stuff, or bad karma! I'm gone! look out for the rack!
The Nazisraelis is not a fresh thought only a fresh wording. There are historical conspiracy theories which prop up their ugly heaad frequently. There was one in Russia 100 + years ago which was especially nauseous. In Europe during the 1700's there was another which came up and especially vicious toward the Jewish People. The DaVinci Code is worse than stupid but its proponents really get off on it.
So why hate a people who do not really exist? That has to be dumber than a rock.
I am always baffled by unreasonable declarations of fact. Why is it okay for one group to demand submission through terrorism and not okay for another to use force to protect its own borders won in a public battle?
And why is intense hatred okay for one group and its hatred to manifest itself in the destruction of innocent civilians when the other side is condemned for using force to restain the violence. wisdom is justified in the eyes of its children.
So if there is a moral imperative to speak well why the inconsistency of the one who holds this view. The inability of the M.I person to hold to the M.I. is to fall under its own condemnation.
Since it has been assigned to me as an empty headed fanatic and there is only a dream in the sky, it kind of looks by the logic of it all that I am following a man who is on the level of a man who considers himself to be a poached egg.
Think I will enjoy an omelet in the AM.
Vitriolic hatred is a reflection of the brokenness of Man. Without trying to speak offensively, but in the tongue of the bard ::grins::; the words which come out of our mouths or onto paper don't come from nowhere. They come from the inner spirit of the one speaking or writing. But if we are only biological eletric cells held together by luminem, who really cares – to man as man, good riddance.
As a conclusion, vile, filthy words or caustic vitriol flow out of the spirit of the person speaking or writing and are in fact who the person really is – bad english but good flowing American cultural communication. Crudeness in words / sound / or euphamisms is really at the heart of the one using them.
You just can't splatter words out there and not expect to be brought up short. Go for it!
Enjoy the weekend. I'm going to go talk to the poached egg.
So as I swagger down the primrose path to nothingness, let me quote a cultural dude from a decade ago, "if ya coo, ya got ta be coo twen ty fo owhs a de." Problem is " ah don (long o) got da swagga fo da talk.
aan yong he kay say oh!
shalom
With fulmination, Guillaume spews invectives and vituperation. What is the basis for English law? What are morals? Who decides what is right and wrong? In the end it is "Judeo-Chistian" "morals" that birthed liberal ideals like freedom of religion and freedom of speech.
"The Palestinians won't be satisfied until the state of Palestine supplants the state of Israel and every last Jew is gone."
True or false? I don't want to believe it.
If Only Israel Wasn’t Jewish…
MUST READ OF THE DAY
Aaron Goldstein writes:
The truth is that Israel could dismantle every last outpost, tear down the security fence and give up Jerusalem and for Palestinians it would be as if nothing happened. As long as there is an Is…
Dale:
Please don’t be so hard on yourself. As a real good thinker of real good thoughts, Guillaume is only pointing out the obvious that them Jews is taking over the world (or is it them Jews are taking over the world? I can never get that one straight), and we need to do something about the nazisraeli threat right now before things get even worse, and we all have to start going to church on Saturdays instead of Sundays, or something like that which would be harmful to society, and then cause Guillaume to rescind his permission for you to practice your religion — foolish as it is.
This threat to humankind is obviously compounded by the “mad islamists” that Guillaume pointed out along with them Jews, which itself is exacerbated by the fact that we’ve got a guy named “Hussein” over at the White House who’s controlled by them Jews, which makes him an Islamonazisraeli of the worst kind! Only a real good thinker could think real good enough to see this kind of threat clearly, and point out how believing in aka god is the root of all man’s evil.
By the way, I’m not as real good a thinker as Guillaume, but I have been known to struggle through expressing an idea or two; though nothing admittedly quite as profound as “The world is lay, and justice should be based only in facts and reason.” Man, I wish I said that! It’s so profound, in a deep and reflective sort of way. My own meager contribution in the past has been something like this —
“If an atheist believes that nothing created the universe, and we cease to exist on any level once we die, then he believes that the contents of my cat’s litter box has the same intrinsic value as he. They both exist as the result of a natural process, and will both degrade back into their base elements at some future point in time. Neither has any inherent value in its own right (i.e., a soul), though each does possess a set of different characteristics. The turd can’t talk, but the atheist can spout sh*t, and that’s really the only thing that separates them when you look at this on a cosmic level. Since the universe created itself, and man grew out of that creation, there is no role for God. If there is no God, then there is no morality independent of what man himself creates.”
We should just look to the United Nations then as the fountainhead of all that is moral, since it represents the totality of all the world’s real good thinkers, and puts a lie to what Guillaume said when he spoke truth to power and observed that “you are wrong when you assert that there is only moral with religion.” You’d know this too if it wasn’t for them Jews and Islamonazisraelis who are running the world like Guillaume pointed out.
I also like very much the idea of ending every comment with a quote to show everyone how good a thinker I am too, in case they didn’t get it just from reading my words. I have two, both inspired by Guillaume. I can’t make up my mind yet which one makes me look the smartest, so I’ll use them both.
“Eschew obfuscation when communicating a platitudinous banality”
“When all else fails, blame the Jews”.
I enjoyed talkin to the man upstairs and never did find the poached egg. Thanks C.S.
I found that if I feign intellectual studity and present a humorous side to my upbringing which only a true Swede would understand, then no one will be intimidated by my intellectual brilliance.
Arrogance is not in short supply in my family – pretty bright people and to say the least everyone of the more than 150 of us have lived honorably and leave a lasting legacy.
When I banter in writing it is less painful for the one receiving the truth if indeed they can receive it. In writing I try to match the tone but find myself unable to descend into the baseless vitriol of the ones who have not done their home work.
When talkin to the invisible man of trascendental whims – but of course a real person – I am brought back to the understanding of True Truth (thanks, Fran Sch).
The Jewish Nation past and present – the people – are the most unique people on the earth. The blood of "this people" darkens the soil of every continent on earth. The nation without their true leader makes mistakes and needs to be held accountable for their errors even as any other nation needs the same.
Their gift of understanding Universals in the flow of thought and subsequently Moral Absolutes is beyond brilliance. The antagonism of incredible magnitude against them as a people and their nation where ever 'one' plugs into the calendar is more than staggering.
Collusion and corruption is rampant in all human governments, but to believe this small group of people control the flow of nations is beyond absurd. The mind of hatred being blinded by the smell of the blood it demands spilled drifts through the matrix of reality into the world of mythology.
The machinations of the human mind so blinded and functioning in the realm of mythology becomes the slave to the human drift in the imagination. A complete divorce between reason and faith. Reason and faith separated from true Truth become the most dangerous combination on earth.
Walk the street and you will be confronted by someone who is physically and mentally a bully. Growing up I ran frequently from the bullies of our community and schools. Bullies never acquiesce to weakness, reasonable discussion, re-established boundaries, backing off to their threats, negotiations or any shading of these ideas.
They understand power and annihilation. You hit me, I hit you twice as hard. You kill my stuff, I will come after you. You burn my stuff and kill my people, and if I live, you will pay beyond your wildest thoughts.
Unfortunately the records of January through May 1947 are almost extinct through neglect or being deliberately covered. There is not need to talk about aliens and dumb stuff but reading this records of that period of time is more than enough in objective history to convince an inquiring mind of the spiritual realm.
Yeh, but we could say, "it was only luck or coincidence." But then again, "even a pig can find an acorn if it roots about the tree long enough!"
Oh my goodnes. A presentation of ideas is just too much. Going for the jugular in the exchange of ideas is too painful for some.
We wrestle not agains flesh and blood but – sorry I was told not to introduce anything spiritul – opps, I mean religious – into the interaction.
Celebrate life and live it to the fullest. Transform the Culture and the Nation.
Re: religious fanatic. Julia Child was a cooking fanatic. Yoyo Ma is a music fanatic. We need more fanatics.
Swanson,
deus vult! All wording, personal offences, and bad constructed sentences, was it all you could produce in defence of nazisrael? I do not think you can convince anyone, besides your fellows of common mental masturbation, with such a poor argument.
"Intellectual Conservative is a contradiction, but Foolish Conservative is a pleonasm."
The real good thinking is back!
I was beginning to worry that Mr. Guillaume had exhausted his real good thoughts about Islamonazisraelis and them Jews who are ruining the world, but fear not! Who says liberals can’t call a spade a spade like the Reverend Wright did? Even though he’s one of those religious fanatics who believes in aka god, at least his god is black, and he doesn’t like them Jews a lot either. So we’ve at least been able to establish a real good dialogue with our educated friends across the pond who speak the language of the bard while saying intellectual things like dues vult and pleonasm while correcting spelling errors and warning against mad Islamist islamonazisraelis like our new president who’s controlled by them Jews even though his middle name is Hussein.
We haven’t had this kind of intellectual real good thinking here in a long time, and I’d say it’s real a blessing to be treated to such real good thoughts if words like blessing didn’t suggest there’s an aka god out there somewhere, which we all know can’t be real like I showed you before with my real good-inspired thinking about atheists and a kitty litter box.
I still can’t decide whether “Eschew obfuscation when communicating a platitudinous banality” or “When all else fails, blame the Jews” makes me look the smartest. Since “pleonasm” as already been taken, and “adumbration” and “ontological” don’t quite fit with what I want to say (though perseverate and supercilious hold out some possibilities), I guess I’ll just flip a coin and see which comes up first.
“When all else fails, blame the Jews”.
Ellis,
it is "deus vult", at least learn how to copy the words right! If you have trouble in sequencing the characters, use ctrl-c, ctrl-p. Yet, "deus vult" is your mental onanist friends' only argument to defend nazisrael.
Who cares what is obama's middle name, when everybody knows that the nazionists have him well tamed?
Here is a suggestion for your closing sentence: “When all else fails, lie and make it up that the world is after jews”.
"Intellectual Conservative is a contradiction, but Foolish Conservative is a pleonasm."
I was hoping Mr. Guillaume could correct my meager efforts too, since he speaks the language of the bard across the pond so well as a real good thinker that he is. Only a real good thinker who knows that them jews is islamonazisraelis can catch important things like this when he talks about his masturbation and other reel intelektshual things like that to show us all what a real good thinker he is.
In fact, I’m prepared to say that Mr. Guillaume is the best real good thinker we’ve ever had who talked about them jews and the islamonazisraelis. Usually, we just get the Real Nazis who drop in to tell us all about them jews and how bad they is, but now we get the enlightened French to tell us this too, so you know it has to be real good thinking because, after all, who else would put a McDonald’s on the Champs-Élysées except a country full of real good thinkers? Me, personally, I never eat there because there are too many of them jews who own McDonalds just like they do everything else in the world like the nazisraelis they are, which is why real good thinkers everywhere need to keep talking about masturbation to show what real good thinkers they are. I mean, talk about your self abuse!
I have to admit, of all the real good thinkers there are in the world — and original thinkers too, I mean, who’d have ever thunk to say something like nazisraeli to show us how real good a real good thinker can be — Guillaume is the bestest one we’ve ever had! If there was a real good thinkers award, he’s be sure to get it. And if you don’t believe me, you could just ask him cause he’d tell you it’s true, and then you’d know for sure.
So everybody, watch out for them jews if you’re ever eating in a McDonald’s in Paris, because you never know when they might go nazisraeli on you.
Now for my real smart quote to show that I can say deep, thoughtful things too.
“When all else fails, blame the Jews”
By the way, when you write back with more real good thoughts, that is, if your hands are free long enough to write back soon, I’d appreciate it if you could give me some pointers on hot to spot one of them jews who is a nazisraeli. Is it the size of their nose I should be looking for, or the horns coming out of their heads, or just the number of McDonalds they own (although them Pakistanis are starting to sneak up on them jews here in the US of A.). But that’s another story.
Normally I wouldn’t bother a real good thinker like you, Mr. G., but I don’t speak German so I can’t consult any of the primary sources one might normally go to. I know you’re French, not German, but I figure you guys collaborated enough with them during WWII so maybe you’ve all picked up enough of that language to be of help.
Anyway, it’s a real dilemma since you’ve made such a strong intellectual case against them jews (much better than Reverend Wright ever did!), I wouldn’t want my daughter to marry one because then I’d have to grow a beard and wear a beanie to her wedding, and it just wouldn’t go well with the rest of my wardrobe.
Thanking you in advance.
Oh, I almost forgot to close with a quote like all good thinkers do.
“When all else fails, blame the Jews”
Mr Ellis,
thanks for compliments, even though, they were meant to be sarcastic. May I point out that most of your objections are coming from assertions that you independent and creatively are attributing to my authoring, but that were never written or implied by me. To be more specific, I have never made any apologies to persecuting any persons or peoples, on the basis of their race, creed, gender or culture, no matter if they are, jews, islamists, sayajins, ferengis, etc.
Now before I proceed to try to answer any of your queries in my next posts, I need you to pass me a piece of information. Do you think that the will of god is a sufficient justification for any earthly matter, as for example the right for a foreign people to establish a state in foreign land detrimentally to its indigenous population? Please, simply answer yes or no, and do not tergiversate.
At last I affirm you I can spot neither a jew, nor an islamist, nor an american, but I know that sayajins, or sayans as you derogatorily call them in the u.s., have tails, and ferengis are short and have big ears!
"Intellectual Conservative is a contradiction, but Foolish Conservative is a pleonasm."
More real good thinking from Mr.Guillaume!
We are truly blessed, in a non-aka god sort of way, that he took time off from his self-abuse perseverations to respond again to us ignurant con-servatives with his real good thinking on ferengis, even though the questions I asked was about them jews who like to go nazisraeli on us from time to time, as Mr. G. and the Reverend Wright have warned on more than one occasion.
I’m still looking for a real good thinking answer on how to spot one of them jews who is nazisraelis which is the focus of Mr. G’s original comments. I’m still unclear on the horns vs. big nose thing, but I’m hoping Mr. G can spurt out a few comment here while stroking that major intellect of his which gives him all that real good thinking he’s been treating us to, that is if he isn’t spent from all that effort.
I know it has to be hard to think real good with at least one of your hands occupied, because anything less than a firm grasp of the issue won’t produce a satisfactory result. But I have faith that anyone who can talk about the highly original characterization of “nazisraelis’ ought to be able to at least tell us all how to identify one by appearance if not smell, though if you’ve ever wandered too far off the beaten path across the pond where some people speak the language of the bard, you’d know that things can get a little ripe in a place where a lot of these people still haven’t accustomed themselves to American style hygiene.
So, because we unedujekated Conservatives need the firm, steady, even rhythmic guidance of a steady hand like Mr. G. to guide our thoughts, it’s reel important to follow up on what a real good thinker said about them jews who is being Nazis over there in the middle east and formed Israel after the United Nations partitioned palestine before we can talk about French colonialism that acted in a detrimental (that means “not good”) way toward “indigenous populations” around the world.
Now, for my real smart quote again, tom make sure everyone knops I’m a real good thinker too.
“When all else fails, blame the Jews”
Mr.Guillaume:
I know that communicating across the pond with someone who speaks the language of the bard can be difficult at times, but I want to assure you that I am most sincere in acknowledging all the real good thinking that you are demonstrating. Your real good thinking is so real good that it’s almost in a category by itself.
Believe you me, I’m not trying to jerk you off just to get a rise out of you. I really want you to spurt out some of that real good thinking you’re famous for across the pond where you speak the language of the bard and use words like tergiversate, which means keep focused on the things you brought up in the first place, which is that them jews who is a bunch of nazisraelis is ruining the world and other important stuff like that.
My thoughts aren’t as rigid or as firm as yours because I’m not the real good thinker you are about important stuff like this, so before I can even hope to discuss what an aka god might/should/could/outta do so I can reply to the hard kind of thinking you’re noted for, I need you to tell me how to spot one of them nazisraelis you told us all about, particularly since you said you never apologized to people about discriminating against them because of their race.
So, as the real good thinker we all know you are, just tell us whether it’s the big nose, horns, their smell, or some other clue that gives them away so I can keep my daughter from falling under the spell of them jews who is nazisraelis, so I won’t have to wear a beanie to her wedding or go to church on Saturdays if I want to worship aka god, since you gave us all permission to do that a while back.
Oh, and remember, “When all else fails, blame the Jews”. It’s worked for a lot of people, as I’m sure you more than anyone knows.
Ellis,
since it seems that you only a need well fixed protruding object to attain pleasure, why don’t you use your two free hands to answer with a single word, yes or no, my simple question.
What are you afraid of? That “thegawd” might hurl you a bolt from the sky?
By the way I think that the four years of vichy france ought to have been studied in more detail, but then it is WWII, and that is a “no no” subject to be touched, is it not?
It is a pity you do not read german, otherwise you could get acquainted with “altneuland” a novel that is true expression of the nazi, fascist and colonial mentality that existed in XIX century europe. Shame on you!
"Intellectual Conservative is a contradiction, but Foolish Conservative is a pleonasm."
Ellis,
I just remembered, once I spotted a lady who happened to be jewish. She was over 18, the ink was water washable, and the work was done under her consent. My thoughts were kept rigid for a time long enough, but to keep her from becoming conceited because of these surpassingly great revelations, I gave her a thorn in her flesh. All this happened in a drive to damascus, and she adored it.
"Intellectual Conservative is a contradiction, but Foolish Conservative is a pleonasm."
Mr. Guillaume:
Was that lady with the ink one of them jews who is the nazisraleis you dun warned us about, because I know a few of them jew-folks whose ink don’t wash off real good. Is that how we unedujukated con-servatives is supposed to know one of them jew nazisraelis you said we need to be a-feared of ‘cause they’s gonna take over the world if we don’t stop ‘em?
And did your “rigid thoughts” about this woman culminate in a fulfilling, self-gratifying climax of real good thinking? I’ll admit it’s hard keeping it up with your real good thinking on aka god who hurls bolts from the sky, ‘cause that’s the kind of deep, satisfying intellectual release we’ve dun cum to expect from you, which is why we all have to recognize that unlike us unedjukated people the French Are Real Thinkers. Them’s a lot of words to type without making no spelling errors, so I’ll just use the initials to say you, as a real good thinking Frenchman, FART real well. In fact, when you FART you pretty well clear the room with all that real good thinking, but it does leave kind of an aftertaste in the nose and mouth if you catch my drift, partikarly when you try real hard to keep it up and show us all what a real good thinker you are.
So thank you again real kindly for all those FARTs you’ve been dropping to show us what an ignorant bunch we is, but it still don’t tell me how to identify one of them nazisraelis you made such a fuss about previous. I’m still waiting to hear how to tell ‘em apart from the good folk who don’t have no thorns to prick when they’re farting out those real good thoughts about them jews who is nazisralis even though you’d never “touch” yourself when thinking about how them French liked to collaborate with the real Nazis to kill them jews when the French weren’t busy acting in a detrimental way toward indigenous populations around the world.
Now, for my real good thinking quote.
“When all else fails, blame the Jews”
“At last I affirm you I can spot neither a jew …”
“I just remembered, once I spotted a lady who happened to be jewish.”
The one great thing about insufferable pseudo-intellectual boors, is that when given a chance to impress you with their superior reasoning, they invariably can’t remember what they said from one comment to another.
I have a new real good thinking end-quote:
“Consistency is the hobgoblin of liberal minds.”
Tell us Mr Phillip Ellis Jackson, why do you hold much hatred against the jews?
You hide beneath a veil of false sarcasm to express your very own true feelings. Or is it the man that every night snatches his body and gets deep inside you, responsible for your anti-jewish statements?
"Intellectual Conservative is a contradiction, but Foolish Conservative is a pleonasm."
Mr. Guillaume:
I is jest a poor ignorant feller whose trying reel hard to understand what a “nazisraeli” is, which is a term you used to describe them jews over there. Remember that real good thinking statement you made back there in comment #3 about “The advent of Nazisrael”?
Then there’s that other real good thinking you said in comment #5 about them “rabid jews” we ignorant folk got keep wary of.
Well sir, like the simple folk I am, I is jest askin’ you to help me understand how to identify one of them rabid jews before they go nazisrael in me and make me wear a beanie or something real bad like that ‘cause they’re out to destroy indigenous populations with their aka gods that hurl bolts on their way to Damascus.
Since you — as the official real good thinker — thunk hard enough to raise these real important issues, it’s only fair of me — the dumb ignurant one — to ask you to help me identify them rabid jew nazisralis you spoke about.
Or is it only now, that the ignurace of what you done said is so obvious to ever-one, that you done switched from words like “rabid jew” to “jewish” to act like a real good thinker across the pond who speaks the language of the bard to make people think you’re not just an ordinary a racist fool with a good vocabulary?
Now for my clever end quote to show ever-one how real smart I am.
“Consistency is the hobgoblin of liberal minds.”
Just finished reviewing personality test and found I do not have any anti anybody stuff in my make up. So that must mean I am not mean
Me scewwed of hobgoblins – thanks for all the good interaction on this post.
The jews I have met and there are many are Nazi anything. Man, dis boy gotta git hiss facs strait. dem skull cap boys ain't nobodees servants – neva haff bin. luv how da man in da sky discombobulates peple whom kent tink.
Shalom – gotta love Israelis for their guts to deal with nations which/that/who want to drive them into the sea – aka, 1967.
Charis
aka 1947
Opps – meant – are not Nazis anything!
Thanks, my publisher, editor missed this.
Dale:
My only regret is that this exchange with Mr. G. didn’t take place off-line, so I could publish it as another chapter in my Looney Liberal Chronicles. But since it’s already in the public domain, I’ll just have to settle for the intrinsic satisfaction I get from everyone watching this train wreck unfold in real time.
I’m still waiting for at least one member of the Enlightened Left to begin a discussion of their real good ideas without launching into some variation of “rabid jews” promoting their “aka god” who want to go “nazisraeli” on us, and you’re all a bunch of ignorant fools if you think this is a bigoted comment.
So, in the absence of a true exchange of ideas, I think the lead you initially took is the correct one. Just look at what these clowns actually say, treat their comments as if they are serious intellectual thoughts, and then use their own words as a basis for engaging in a discussion.
You never quite know where the insanity will take you, but the ride is always illustrative.
Now to end with my Guillaume-inspired real good thinking quote to make sure everyone knows what a real smart guy I am.
“Ideas are stupid, not people. But truly stupid people will fail to see this distinction.”
PS — a personal note to Mr. Guillaume:
Please don’t take this last exchange with Dale as an attempt to bate you into leaving the discussion. I know you think I have been bating you with my comments, but I’d be the first to concede that you are the acknowledged Master Bater in this conversation, and I would never try to deny you the recognition you so urgently deserve in this matter.
The kind of stuff you write — and the way you express yourself with such profundities as “the world is lay”, and “that is a ‘no no’ subject” — are priceless in their own right, matched only by the antiquated colloquialisms you toss around, like speaking the “language of the bard” and “congregation leader”. When you’re not using highly original imagery of Nazisrael, or “rabid jews” to make your point that you’re not just an anti-Semitic clown masquerading as a deep thinker, you’re talking about your ability to spot a jew at fifty paces even though you “affirm” (another great language choice) that you can’t tell the difference between jews and anyone else.
So, on a personal note, I’m asking you most sincerely to keep blessing us all (in a non-aka god sort of way) with your continued wisdom and good cheer. It’s just too good to see you go away too soon.
Now, for my closing quote.
“In an insane world, only the sane are considered insane” — Star Trek.
Mr Phillip Ellis Jackson who hates jews worries about the term “rabid jew”, but not about “mad islamist”.
This happens because he hates so much the jews, that in this case he is eager to take an adjective that was written to particularise a subgroup, as the generalisation of the whole group. On the other hand as Mr Phillip Ellis Jackson loves islam, especially in the figure of Hussein his nation leader, he is ready, in the “mad islamist” case, to acknowledge the adjective as just a particularisation of a subgroup, leaving the image of the main group untarnished.
"Intellectual Conservative is a contradiction, but Foolish Conservative is a pleonasm."
Mr. Guillaume:
It’s real good that you cum back again with more real good thinking about them rabid jew nazisraelis that you warned us all about. And I’m thankful you done spoke about them mad islamists too, just to remind us all that flying planes into the world trade center to kill innocent people is no different than building a house where someone doesn’t want it built.
Ever-one here at the Intellektul Con-servative done knows how much I fears them jews, havin’ written so much about it and all. And like you pointed out, they knows how much I loves Mr. Hussein Obama, havin’ supported him regular like I did. Why hush my grits if I didn’t jest write something on this jest a few days ago right here in the IC.
But the one thing you is so rite about is my love of islam. In fact, I loves them islam folk so much I done converted to islam two years ago.
http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2007/03/13/democrats-hate-little-children-allah-be-praised/
I know you isn’t a Democrat, but you is a Liberal, so you’d appreciate more than many what I writ before.
Listening to Liberals and Democrats is like watching a group of ten-year-olds on the school playground call someone a stinky-pants, or say that they’re ugly, or insist that their mother never really liked them. Nobody really analyzes what they say. You don’t find their teacher sniffing around little Johnny’s trousers to see if he’s actually emitting a foul odor, or sizing up little Suzie for a nose job and other plastic surgeries, or calling Tommy’s Mom to see if she does love her little boy after all.
Instead, you treat the remarks for what they actually are; silly, infantile expressions coming from a group of children who really don’t know any better, and as such can’t be held to the same standard as an adult. Contrast this with the same comment made by little Johnny/Suzie/Tommy’s teacher, and you’d see him or her put on suspension pending a full disciplinary hearing before the board of education.
And so it is that the Left can say just about anything they want — from commenting on race relations, to sexual orientation, to the war in Iraq — and no matter how egregiously stupid they act or sound the press isn’t going to call them on it. But let the “adults” (that is, Republicans and Conservatives) comment on the same subject matter, and every word, punctuation mark and/or nuance of what they say is scrutinized for content which is then used to criticize them.
So what are we to do, given this new awareness of why our side is routinely condemned for saying things that are infinitely less controversial than the bilge pouring from the mouths of so many leftists? There’s really only one answer.
Convert to Islam.
Next to Liberals and Democrats, the only group saying stupider things and getting away with it are the Islamo-fascists.
So, to make myself immune from criticism for anything I say, I’ve decided to temporarily convert to the Religion of Peace. From now on, if you don’t accept every word I write, I will issue a Phil-twah (my version of the fatwah) against you. I will call upon my Islamic brethren to defend the honor of my faith and scare you into ignoring the consequences of anything I do or say.
If you think this is a particularly stupid idea, I strongly suggest that you keep your opinion to yourself. I’m not some ridiculous Christian anymore whose faith you can insult with bogus documentaries on Jesus’ lost tomb or some DaVinci Code mockery. I’ve joined the fastest growing religion on the planet that just happens to elevate men above women — who have no rights other than those men grant them, not that the feminists in the United States seem to mind, since defeating George Bush and the evil Republican/Conservatives is clearly a more pressing issue.
In short, my stupidity is now on par with other protected classes, and the rules of modern conversation not only require you to acknowledge this, but to embrace it as a good and progressive thing. So if you do want to comment on what I’ve said, I expect complete agreement.
Remember, there’s no “turn the other cheek” in the Religion of Peace, any more than there is the expectation of accountability in the comments made by a Liberal or Democrat.
Phillip Bin-Ellis Jackson
I am glad that you ended your missive with a customary quote to show us all how deep and insightful you are. You are such an inspiration to all of us, I’ve searched again for the right thoughts to compliment what you said.
“A man has got to believe in something. I believe I’ll have another beer”.
Mr Phillip Ellis Jackson,
it was interesting to read your child/adult comparison, since it is you who in our post exchange prefers to comment on my person (ad-hominem attacks and fallacies), my writing style, etc, rather than on the main topic that should be under discussion. Can’t you see that this kind o behaviour detracts you more, than me, especially, because, as I have recently learnt, you are an official writer of this website.
Having said that, it may come to your surprise, that I cannot agree more with the perception expressed in the precedent post about islam, and the advantages one attracts on a PC society, by claiming to be an adept of such faith. I would just extend this perception of “how good” it is to be an islamist, on “how good” it is to be an adept of any faith, in particular, if these adepts are oversensitive about being discriminated and persecuted.
This time I will add an extra quote:
everybody happy?
WE-WE-WE
& to hell with the chappy
who doesn’t agree (ee cummings)
"Intellectual Conservative is a contradiction, but Foolish Conservative is a pleonasm."
Well don’t that take it all!
Mr. Guillaume, the best real good thinker we’ve ever had on this website, has named me the “official writer” of this website. It’s a real honor sir, that I will wear proudly knowing that a good thinker like you has thunk that someone like me can be an “official writer” of a website which is open to all people who want to write about what they think. Of course, you gotta actually use your real full name when you do, unless you just want to be the unofficial real good thinker who only comments on what other people write, and can hide behind your anonymity while saying things like “rabid jews” and “nazisraelis” while condemning the people who point out the fact that this makes you look like a fool and a bigot.
And Mr. G. is even more generous with his time — when he’s not busy warning us about them rabid jews who is nazisraelis — to give me some real friendly advice about not “detracting” from my arguments with ad-hominem attacks … you know, like talking about rabid jews and nazisraelis jest ‘cause you don’t like what they stand for and believe in aka god.
So I thank you kindly again for that, and your little poem about cumming (which seems to be a constant concern of yours going back to your early masturbatory and onanistic commentary), but it still don’t answer the question I asked based on your original comments.
Just how do we identify one of them rabid jews before they go nazisraeli on us, since you’re the one who raised the issue in the first place?
“I love you”
“You love me”
“We’re a happy fam-i-ly”
— Barney the Dinosaur theme song.
Now for my real good thinking quote:
“When all else fails, blame the Jews”
Psst:
Notice how I didn't need to point out the spelling error in "kind o behaviour" like Mr. G. did jest to show ever-one how really smart I is?
Hey boys and girls, I’ve got a new game for all of us to play. It’s based on Mr. Guillaume’s complaint that some people “comment in our post exchange on my [Mr. G.’s] person (ad-hominem attacks and fallacies), my writing style, etc.?
I’m going to give you 5 excerpts from the first 7 comments to this post, before I arrived on the scene. See if you can guess who made these statements. Here they are:
1. “How do you expect us to give you any credits when your one in every two words you write is an adjective?” (Comment 1)
2. “The advent of Nazisrael may be an "amazing national phenomina" (sic) only the anals of your family.” (Comment 3) [Note: it’s annals, not anals, but I wouldn’t think of pointing that out after Mr. G let the typo on “phenomena” go by without comment.]
3. “… you seem to be a religious fanatic … “(Comment 5)
4. “… you are not the good fellow you think you are!” (Comment 5)
5. “… it seems to me that your sentences are written in an order that is not English, or, maybe, just lack punctuation marks (commas, semicolons, etc), let alone the many spelling errors that I will condescend as only typing mistakes.” (Comment 7)
Now remember Comment 27 from me, the “official writer” of this website:
“The one great thing about insufferable pseudo-intellectual boors, is that when given a chance to impress you with their superior reasoning, they invariably can’t remember what they said from one comment to another.”
I said I hoped that Mr. Guillaume (or, “Mr. Bill” as the English translation goes; talk about a self-fulfilling prophesy), would hang around a bit longer. Nothing quite illustrates the selective outrage and moral bankruptcy of the Left like their own words.
Now for my real smart ending quote:
“Irony is lost on the ironic. But more irony is lost on the truly moronic”.
Phillip Ellis Jackson,
the meaning and context of the terms "mad islamist" and “rabid jew” have already been explained in previous posts They are recognised the same way one recognises a fanatic fundamentalist christian: as someone who thinks that his or her own beliefs are universal, and that everyone should abide by them. In the case of rabid jews they want all of us to abide by the promise that their supposed god of their beliefs have supposedly made to a people that they suppose to be their ancestors, whose rights they suppose to have inherited.
A nazisraeli or nazionist is someone who follows the nationalistic, colonial and fascist doctrine created by the end of XIX century in europe, by europeans, esp. german and austrians, whose primary expressions can be found in german books like “altneuland” and “der judenstaat”.
"Intellectual Conservative is a contradiction, but Foolish Conservative is a pleonasm."
Phillip Ellis Jackson,
in post #3, listed 2 in your last message, it is written:
… your historical knowledge is poor to say the least. The advent of Nazisrael may be an "amazing national phenomina" (sic) only the anals of your family.
Notice the (sic) after “national phenomina” to indicate that it was intentionally so written to reproduce the original text of the writer of post #2. The word anals is spelled correctly to indicate the only place where the previous poster could find support for his argument. I admit that there is a typo mistake since the last part of sentence should be: only IN the anals …
"Intellectual Conservative is a contradiction, but Foolish Conservative is a pleonasm."
Phillip Ellis Jackson,
in post #25, referred in post #27,it is said that I spotted a lady with water washable ink. It was only by chance that she happened to be jewish.
I still confirm that I can spot neither a mad islamist nor a rabid jew.
"Intellectual Conservative is a contradiction, but Foolish Conservative is a pleonasm."
Mr. Guillaume:
I realise/realize that I is just an ignorant con-servative who needs a real good thinker to explain thing to me, but you done used the words first without no explanation of what they means.
I looked real hard in my dikshunary for “rabid jew” but didn’t find no definition there. And I looked even harder for “nazisrael” but no such word seems to exist.
So it appears to a simple folk like me that you’re just tossing out words in ad-hominem attacks against people you don’t like too much. I is just tryin’ to help out all them folks who is so much dumber than you recognize/recognise one of them “rabid jews” so they don’t get bit and need no shots, and find out where the swastika’s are in Israel-land so I can find where them nazisraelis are hiding out, since you said you don’t like to smear an entire race of people with one stroke. After all, it was you who introduced these terms into our discussion, not me.
Of course, if someone points out the ignorance and hate-filled bias of using a term “nazisraeli”, it’s only understandable that the person who made such a dumb comment would now try to get back to some real good thinking again and say “A nazisraeli or nazionist”, like both words is the same when they really isn’t (you know, like saying “alienation” and “alien nation”, and pretending they’s both the same thing because they use the same kind of words).
I’m guessing that in the end you’re just spoutin’ off rather than thinking real good cause now you want to have kind of a real discussion of sorts without recognizing/recognising the utter stupidity of your previous comments, ‘specially when you say that someone is “rabid’ if they believe that “his or her own beliefs are universal, and that everyone should abide by them.” You know, kind of like a feller who would reduce a belief in aka god to hurling lightning bolts and saying thins like “If you need to be bribed with paradise, with or without young virgins awaiting for you, to endeavour into justice and good deeds, then, maybe, you are not the good fellow you think you are!” — as if that’s what religion is and think everyone else should believe this too.
And speaking about that there nazisrael you made comment of, I don’t quite recollect the United Nations saying these folks could set up shop there because aka god or even thegawd” told ‘em they had inherited the land. ‘Course, I’m sure you didn’t mean to imply such a stupid thing when you went spoutin’ off about people who hold real strong feelings, ‘cause that might seem a bit, you know, hypocritical based on the way you tend to structure your own thoughts.
Time now for my Mr. Guillaume-inspired closing quote:
“When all else fails, blame the Jews”
>in post #25, referred in post #27,it is said that I spotted a lady with water washable ink. It was only by chance that she happened to be jewish. I still confirm that I can spot neither a mad islamist nor a rabid jew.
*** So how then did you know she was a jew if you can’t spot one, since you again have introduced this subject. Was she wearing a Star of David on her coat, or standing on a street corner shouting “hey everyone, look at me. I’m a jew”? Or was it something more subtitle like the shape of her nose, or how she smelled? I hear them “rabid jews” can get pretty rank. Or, were you just lying about the whole thing about spotting a jew you couldn’t really spot?
It’s not often we get a real good thinker like you who visits our website and alerts us to the threat of rabid jews, mad islamists and dangerous people who believe in aka god, so I want to take full advantage of your brilliance and powers of perception to hone my own meager analytical skills.
You raised the issue. You used the words. You own the stupidity. Now man up and answer the questions.
Now for my real good thinking quote:
“Ideas are stupid, not people. But truly stupid people will fail to see this distinction.”
[This is the most fun I've had since the real Nazis showed up a couple of years ago telling us all about them jews and a-rabs and mesikans who was acting all improper, and how we should understand that they was real good thinkers too just like Mr. G.]
Phillip Ellis Jackson,
Now after your long discourse on bias and terminology can you answer my question posed very long ago?
Do you (not the UN) think that the will of god is a sufficient justification for any earthly matter, as for example the right for a foreign people to establish a state in foreign land detrimentally to its indigenous population?
"Intellectual Conservative is a contradiction, but Foolish Conservative is a pleonasm."
This is great!
I point out what a hypocrite Mr. G. is for his complaint about “ad-hominem attacks” against him, and he responds by disputing the spelling of annals.
This clown has no clue what he’s doing.
“You can lead a person to knowledge, but you can't make them think.”
Mr. G.
I said that I wasn't going to discuss the sorry history of French colonialism and your personal moral relativism until you told us how to identify “rabid jews.” And “nazisraelis” Your sophistic explanation is a dodge, not an explanation. You made the charge, you used the words, you own the stupidity. Now man up and tell us how to really spot one, or just admit what we already know. That you’re just a pseudo-intellectual with a good vocabulary.
“Gross stupidity is a designation that must be earned by a person, not simply assigned out of frustration.”
Phillip Ellis Jackson,
ref to post #25: I knew she was jewish because, (read and be amazed) she told me so! I spotted her literally, i.e. painted her coloured spots with water washable ink.
ref to post #3: I mean anals (literally) not annals.
"Intellectual Conservative is a contradiction, but Foolish Conservative is a pleonasm."
Phillip Ellis Jackson,
is your behaviour what ds calls “graduate up to a garden rake”?
What are you afraid of? Disclosing your true self?
"Intellectual Conservative is a contradiction, but Foolish Conservative is a pleonasm."