![](http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_x97oorE2c9c/S6ahTZCOu6I/AAAAAAAAA6Q/WhO_nWZHN4k/S220/ArizonaMiracle.jpg")
The question is why the assault on Vargas didn’t hit the national news. It appears
that part of the reason the story remains buried is because Vargas was
on the politically incorrect side of the debate.
If the name Ben Vargas sounds familiar, it’s probably because his name is quickly becoming a staple in the most engaging reverse discrimination court case to hit the Supreme Court in quite some time. As described in Ricci v. DeStefano, the city of New Haven tossed the results of a promotional firefighting exam to avoid a potential lawsuit by black firefighters. Why? It's quite simple actually. Although some black and Latino firefighters passed the promotional exam, no blacks scored high enough to qualify for an immediate promotion.
Believing that it was unfair not to promote black firefighters, the Civil Service Commission invalidated the test. Incidentally, the only Latino eligible for an immediate advancement, based upon the exams, was Ben Vargas.
It’s no secret at the New Haven Fire Department that the Ricci v. DeStefano case has created a substantial rift between black and white firefighters. Ben Vargas and 19 other firefighters (known as the New Haven 20) filed a reverse discrimination lawsuit against New Haven for tossing the exam and thereby denying them their promotion.
At the very outset, New Haven’s local NAACP and the Firebirds (New Haven’s Black Firefighters organization) sided with the city to toss the exam. When the Local 825 elected to support the New Haven 20, Gary Tinney, leader of the Firebirds, decided to sue his union on the basis of white favoritism. Thus, the Firebirds have positioned themselves against their entire department family by supporting the disenfranchisement of those who passed the exam.
Ben Vargas Assaulted and Found Unconscious
On June 2nd, 2004, the black and Hispanic caucus of New Haven conducted a meeting to discuss a lawsuit against the local union. Gary Tinney, a black firefighter on the department, had questioned Vargas' presence at the event knowing how Vargas felt about killing the promotional exams. Feeling unwelcome, Vargas asked Tinney if he wanted him to leave. Firefighter Darryl Brooks stepped in and responded "no", and welcomed him in.
During the meeting, Tinney had presented an argument that Local 825's decision to support the New Haven 20 would only benefit whites at the financial expense of all the minorities. The opposing view, presented by AFL-CIO President John Olson, was quickly dismissed as favoring the whites.
Two days later on June 4th, 2004, the internal strife of the New Haven Fire Department came to a climax when Ben Vargas was brutally attacked at a local restaurant.According to the police report, Vargas thought there might be a problem when he entered the restaurant seeing Gary Tinney and a few other black firefighters at the bar.
Vargas noted that Gary Tinney left briefly and returned with two unfamiliar black men that looked to be in their 30s. The police report states that Vargas used the bathroom about an hour later and was "sucker punched" after leaving the stall. Restaurant personnel discovered Ben Vargas lying on the bathroom floor bloody and unconscious. Later that night, Vargas was treated at the Yale New Haven hospital.
Although Vargas did not see the assailant, he claimed the attack was orchestrated by a black firefighter on his department. And even though the evidence to support Vargas’ claim isn’t firm, many firefighters on the department consider his accusation to be a matter of fact.
The real question is why the assault on Vargas didn’t hit the national news. It is reasonable to assume that if a black firefighter were violently attacked on the basis of his involvement in a civil rights court case, MSNBC and CNN would have broadcast the story everywhere. It appears that part of the reason the story remains buried is because Vargas was on the wrong side of the politically incorrect debate. And that is truly unfortunate.
First thing, the term reverse discrimination is a misnomer. Wouldn’t the reverse of discrimination be no discrimination? Hate is hate, discrimination is discrimination no matter who does it, let’s call it what it is. It’s not cute when minorities hate as liberals have been trying to sell us for thirty years. There are several things about this story that are telling. One, is why is there a black firefighters organization in the first place? Second, no sane person can defend throwing the test out. What’s the argument, “We have a right to be less qualified and rewarded any way?” Finally, is the NAACP so secure that it’s above criticism that they can joust the windmills of pretend racism and never be called to task? Race relations are the elephant in the room that nobody wants to talk about yet it permeates all aspects of our society. When our gallant media does address the issue it’s always the same theme, “Let’s discuss how bad white people are.” The culture of hate that thrives in our minority communities is palpable. The minute men were dismissed as Mexican hating white guys, the founders are dismissed as a bunch of old dead white men, talk radio listeners are just angry white guys and the tea parties where clandestine white supremacist rallies. Even the fact that Jessie Jackson, Charles Rangel and Al Sharpton can be treated by the media as anything but pathetic clowns is telling. As any reasonable person would agree all people regardless of color should be judged on their merits without grading on a curve. Although I’m powerless to do anything about it, I can ask all who see this to stop using the term reverse discrimination and correct anyone else who does. Let’s not white wash hate by backing away from the correct terms.