Nothing gets liberals more excited than the prospect of global government.
Liberal-progressives' drive to integrate the United States into a world government, a new socialist international under the UN, is a carefully concealed element in the man-made global warming scam. Needless to say, Al Gore and other self-anointed intellectuals envision themselves in positions of great personal power in the forthcoming socialist world government.
Anarchist Mikhail Bakunin, opposing Marxian collectivism in 1872, described what life was to be under such men:
The government will not content itself with administering and governing the masses politically, as all governments do today. It will administer the masses economically, concentrating in the hands of the State the production and division of wealth, the cultivation of land . . . All that will demand the reign of scientific intelligence, the most aristocratic, despotic, arrogant, and elitist of all regimes. There will be a new class, a new hierarchy . . . the world will be divided into a minority ruling in the name of knowledge, and an immense ignorant majority. And then, woe unto the mass of ignorant ones!
Mr. Gore recently acknowledged that global governance is a goal of his monomania:
Gore: U.S. Climate Bill Will Help Bring About "Global Governance"
Gore touted the Congressional climate bill, claiming it "will dramatically increase the prospects for success" in combating what he sees as the "crisis" of man-made global warming.
"But it is the awareness itself that will drive the change and one of the ways it will drive the change is through global governance and global agreements."
Gore's call for "global governance" echoes former French President Jacques Chirac's call in 2000.
On November 20, 2000, then French President Chirac said during a speech at The Hague that the UN's Kyoto Protocol represented "the first component of an authentic global governance.
As I noted in "Senator Obama, Citizen of the World":
The particular relevance of M. Revel's 1970 analysis, with respect to Senator Obama's public relations tour of the Middle East and Europe, has to do with the Senator's speech in Berlin. To roars of approval from the socialist throng in the Tiergarten, he declared:
"I come to Berlin as so many of my countrymen have come before. Tonight, I speak to you not as a candidate for President, but as a citizen — a proud citizen of the United States, and a fellow citizen of the world."
Citizen of the world is liberal-progressive-socialist code for world government, the fundamental socialist goal impelling the 1960s student anarchism. This became the foundation for Senator Obama's cultural and political doctrine. Underlying Senator Obama's continual refrain of change is M. Revel's 1970 expectation:
With respect to the second world revolution [originating during the 1960s in the United States], it is clear that it can have only one goal, on which all other goals, however numerous, must depend. And that single goal is the establishment of world government . . . On that, depends all else, including the establishment of economic equality and the abolition of social classes . . .
In other words, bringing us together and transcending racial barriers is to be accomplished by moving toward world government.
Well, I think we all knew this was in the agenda all along. Anyone who thought differently certainly had more than half their brain tied behind their back, or wasn't reading the closed captions for the thinking impaired.
With any luck this kind of revelation will move more people to the right side of the aisle.
Steven,
You are grossly underestimating the capcity of people to resist admitting having made poor choices. I don't see this will cause actual desertions as much as firing up conservatives and near-conservatives who sat out the last round and, concurrently, deflating some liberals and near-liberals who will now sit down and keep mum for a while without ever actual mentioning the miscalculation or changing sides. The silence will only last as long as it takes Democrats (and the media spin-meisters) to shift blame back onto Republicans (and I don't doubt Republicrats won't give them an opening), and by desperately shifting the focus onto entirely different issues. The challenge for us is to keep them from changing the focus.
I'm with you 100% on this one Bob. The Republicans are all too willing to lay themselves wide open whenever the opportunity presents itself. The only question is when they will do so.