We must face the fact that we are not in some kind of “War on Terror”. We are in nothing less than an ISLAMIC WORLD WAR.

And we must understand that 9/11 was not a ‘terrorist attack’. 9/11 was a military attack, an Islamic blitzkrieg targeting our financial, military and political centers.

It is not us against them, and never has been. It is them against us, Dar al-Islam against Dar al-Harb in a holy war for global domination. Let’s look at the facts:

Islam against:
- the Catholics in the Philippines
- the Buddhists in Thailand
- the Hindus & Sikhs in India
- the Zoroastrians and Baha’i in Iran
- the Chaldean Christians in Iraq
- the Jews in Israel and Yemen
- the Coptic Christians in Egypt
- the Christians and animists in Sudan
- the Christians in Nigeria
- American embassies in Kenya and Tanzania
- the atheists in Europe
- train commuters in Spain
- tube commuters in London
- airports in Scotland
- Dutch politicians like Geert Wilders & Ayyan Hirsi Ali (death fatwa)
- Dutch cartoonists (death fatwa)
- Novelists like Salman Rushdie (death fatwa)
- Journalists like Daniel Pearl (decapitated)
- Nick Berg, Paul Johnson, Kim Sung-il, Piotr Stanczyk (decapitated)
- Jewish centers in Buenas Aries, Caracas, Toronto, Seattle and Mumbai (attacked)
- office workers in the World Trade Center (attacked twice)
- defense workers in the Pentagon
- soldiers at Ft. Hood (slaughtered)
- military recruiters in Little Rock (slaughtered)
- cafe patrons in Bali (blown up twice)
And on, and on, and on…….

THE ISLAMIC WORLD WAR. Here. Now. On every continent except Antarctica, against everyone and everything non-Islamic.

THE ISLAMIC WORLD WAR. It’s real.

~The Infidel Alliance

Now that we have an understanding about the reason Islam is so violent (MUHAMMED), we should understand what the prime objective of Islam is, as found in 2 different Islamic texts:

Muslim (1:33) – the Messenger of Allah, Muhammed, said: “I have been commanded to fight against people till they testify that there is no god but Allah, that Muhammad is the messenger of Allah”

Bukhari (8:387) – Allah’s Apostle Muhammed said, “I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: None has the right to be worshipped but Allah”

Pretty clear. Muhammeds prime directive was to forcibly convert, subjugate or kill all non-Muslims in all non-Islamic lands. This is JIHAD….HOLY WAR…and it has been raging non-stop for 1,400 years.

This is the reason why the Cathedral of Saint Sophia in Constantinople (the seat of eastern Christianity) was turned into a mosque in what is now Turkish Istanbul.

This is why India and her Hindus and Sikhs suffered centuries upon centuries of Islamic assault.

This is why the Zoroastrians were all but exterminated in Persian (now the Islamic Republic of Iran).

This is why the Jews, the first victims of Muhammed, have suffered for centuries under Islamic oppression.

This is why the ancient Buddhists were wiped out of Afgahanistan.

THE ISLAMIC WORLD WAR – this is where it began.

~ The Infidel Alliance

The Koran fetes Muhammed as “an exellent model of conduct”, and Islamic tradition upholds Muhammed as “al-insan al-kamil” or “the perfect man”, but was he?

As can be easily discovered in the Islamic holy texts, the Koran, Ahadith, Sunnah and Sira, Muhammed was far from a perfect man or an excellent model of conduct.

In reality, Muhammed was a sadistic sociopath, a murderer, a mutilator, a decapitator, an amputator, a torturer, a slaver, a human trafficker, a kidnapper, a looter and a thief, a perfidious liar, a rapist, a sex slaver, a sexual deviant, a promiscuous sexual glutton, a child rapist, a genocidist, and a self proclaimed terrorist motivated by lust, greed and power.

By any objective standard, Muhammed was one of the most vile examples of a man to have ever lived. He was simply a successful Charles Manson, who, like Manson, should be reviled, not revered.

Just look at these two passages from the Koran and the Ahadith:
Koran (8:12) – “I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them”

Bukhari (52:220) – Allah’s Apostle Muhammed said… ‘I have been made victorious with terror’

Muhammed….the ‘holy prophet’…..the man who set the moral compass for Islam and all Muslims. Is there any doubt as to why Islam is so violent?

~The Infidel Alliance

Before we do that, we must first inquire into the meaning, or, rather, meanings, of “religion.” I am not even convinced it qualifies as a religion.

Re: “In referring to Islam as a ‘religion of peace,’ is the objector suggesting that Muslims are pacifists, or that the punishments they dispense for the violators of their laws are essentially reasonable, humane, and just? Is Islam a ‘religion of peace’ because it’s assumed Muslims don’t initiate wars?”

An astute observation! In my debates with Muslims, I have notice that they might use the same vocabulary as we in the West, but it has an entirely foreign meaning.

The Old Testament: Psalms Chapter 28, verse 4 says;” Give them according to their deeds, and according to the wickedness of their endeavors: give them after the work of their hands; render to them their desert.”

In this above passage I believe it says we should judge people by their deeds. Therefore we should judge Muslim Fundamentalists by their ‘deeds’.

Hiding behind civilians in order to engage troops. Placing rocket launchers in Palestinian school yards along the Israeli boarder. Sending suicide bombers into markets, mosques, and hospitals. Capturing civilian news reporters and video taping their beheading in order to place the pictures on the internet. Killing their own female family members for perceived ‘dishonors’. Let’s not forget the repeated deliberate targeting of civilians in case after case.

I think Ann Coulter said it best when she wrote; “We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity. We weren’t punctilious about locating and punishing only Hitler and his top officers. We carpet-bombed German cities; we killed civilians. That’s war. And this is war.”

In both cases, these are rough physical environments. It is difficult to earn a living in those environments. For the Irish, the best land was in the hands of the English. The Irish retained ownership of the played-out, small patches of rocky land – hard to raise a family on that. For the Muslim, the best land is near the water sources – which are generally in the hands of a few. Most of the people barely manage to survive.

So the environment encourages the development of a national character that is insular, suspicious, unwilling to work with outsiders, and sufficiently hard-up that justice is brutal (the culture can’t afford leniency).

Over time, all others who don’t share the culture come to be regarded as “the enemy”.

A cursory glance at Middle Eastern history reveals that not only have Muslims been ‘at war’ with Christians for millennia, but that there has also been a long documented trail of violence between the rival sects of the ‘Religion of Peace’. The warring between Irish Catholics and Protestants is an example albeit a poor one. At the height of their anger with each other, they looked like amateurs when compared with the slaughter Islamic Fundamentalists have been foisting on each other for the last 1,200 years.

This is the cusp of the issue whenever the West tries to deal with the Middle East. We deliberately continue to mis-diagnose exactly who we are dealing with. These people have, for over a thousand years, earned admiration among their peers by being more ruthlessly violent than their neighbors. High station is earned at the point of a sword.

For the balance of the last thousand years their propensity for such ‘goings-on’ were of little import. As long as the weapons and the feuds remained ‘personal’ we could afford to shake our heads and ’tisk-tisk’ at our cocktail parties concluding that nothing could be done.

Unfortunately for us, Islam (which by the way is literally translated as ‘Submission’) went national over a generation ago. Fundamentalists began to preach jihad against the ‘Great and Lesser Satans’ of the West. These Middle Eastern people really hold a grudge. They had never forgotten their defeats at the hands of the British generations ago. You can ask a Muslim; “Why did you kill that man?” and he will reply; “Because 60 years ago, his Father’s Father’s Father disrespected my Father’s Father’s Father.” These people make the Hatfields & McCoys look like pikers! At the same moment the sword morphed into the IED, the machine gun, and the C-4 vest.

Now take into account that the more the Western Nations develop into ‘cradle-to-grave’ entitlement states, the more birth rates decline in these Western democracies. Someone has to do the work. So the increasingly older populations of these nations import labor from places that have excess population, and the overwhelming majority of these nations are also overwhelmingly Muslim.

Muslims don’t assimilate into their new populations. Rather they demand the new populations ‘assimilate’ to them. If a Jew marries a Catholic they may both retain their respective religious beliefs. If A Catholic marries a Muslim, someone is converting and I’ll just bet it’s not the Muslim.

All these point to an almost unsolvable problem. We attempt to negotiate with people who deliberately eschew negotiation, believing it stems from weakness. Reference the negotiations between the West and Iran, or the negotiations between the Palestinians and the Jews. In both cases, negotiations are long and drawn out. Once a concession is won by the Islamic side, it becomes the new ‘floor’ for further concessions; with violence, either real or imagined, as the threat if further concessions are not forthcoming. What we cannot grasp is that to even offer to negotiate is seen as a sign of weakness by these people, and they despise the weak.

In times past, Muslims have been defeated. Their surrenders aren’t even permanent. They will pretend to acquiesce, and bide their time until they believe they, once more, have the capacity to fight and will then immediately renew hostilities.

So, given all this, what is the answer? The choice they provide is clear; assimilate or die. The choice we must make is kill or be killed. I choose kill.