… Once an official or professional shows that he shares the manners, the tastes, the interests of the [ruling] class, gives lip service to its ideals and shibboleths, and is willing to accommodate the interests of its senior members, he can move profitably among our establishment’s parts.

If, for example, you are Laurence Tribe in 1984, Harvard professor of law, Leftist pillar of the establishment, you can “write” your magnum opus by using the products of your student assistant, Ron Klain. A decade later, after Klain admits to having written some parts of the book, and the other parts are found to be verbatim or paraphrases of a book published in 1974, you can claim [perhaps correctly] that your plagiarism was “inadvertent,” and you can count on the Law School’s dean, Elena Kagan, to appoint a committee including former and future Harvard president Derek Bok that issues a secret report that “closes” the incident. Incidentally, Kagan ends up a justice of the Supreme Court. Not one of these people did their jobs: the professor did not write the book himself, the assistant plagiarized instead of researching, the dean and the committee did not hold the professor accountable, and all ended up rewarded. By contrast, for example, learned papers and distinguished careers in climatology at MIT [Richard Lindzen] or University of VA [S. Fred Singer] are not enough for their questions about “global warming” to be taken seriously. For our ruling class, identity always trumps.

http://spectator.org/archives/2010/07/16/americas-ruling-class-and-the

It would be a matter of simple wordsmithing and changing the names in the above to describe Rangle’s situation and determine its most likely outcome.