Ever since Barry Soetero ascended to the office of President of the United States, people have wondered exactly what type of man he really is.

Barack Obama broke on the national scene on July 27th 2004 when he delivered the keynote address at the Democratic National Convention in Boston. Although only a state senator at the time; many of the movers and shakers of the DNC felt this person had real potential. The kinship they felt speaks volumes; not only regarding Barack Obama, but about progressives as well.

He was both well spoken and correctly educated; having graduated from both Columbia University and Harvard Law. His outward appearance was impeccable. He possessed all the proper connections to the Illinois Democratic Machine. And; most importantly, had such a thin record that there was literally no way to pin him down on any issue.

This was maybe his most important quality. Progressive democrats had lost two presidential elections exactly because of the records of their candidates. Both Al Gore in 2000 and John Kerry in 2004 could not be dragged across the finish line by the MSM mostly because people across the country knew what they stood for, no matter how they tried to cover it up. Here was a potential dream candidate for the left; someone who could not be tied to anything. He could champion any policy. He was almost above reproach exactly because of his thin resume’.

I’ve been observing Barry’s behavior since his campaign began, and especially since his inauguration. I’ve also had the opportunity to read several essays that discussed his character. Numerous persons have previously speculated as to whether he is merely naive; or is purposefully driven by some philosophy? Here is a partial list of the behavioral and traits I’ve witnessed in the last 22 months.

We’ve already mentioned his educational background and overall physical appearance. We can add to this his aloof nature; his seeming inability to connect with everyday people. He doesn’t seem to do well in ad lib situations, and his use of the teleprompter during his appearances is legend.

This incapacity is coupled with an overdeveloped sense of self; a grandiose nature. He’s a man who seems almost contemptuous of those who dare to question him or his policies. We observed this during the health care debate, in spades. There were countless speeches to the electorate where he tried, to no avail, to explain his vision for universal health care to the population, his glib and charming nature notwithstanding. It was as if he was saying to the American people “Alright, I’m going to go over this once again; and I’m going to speak more slowly so you can keep up this time.”

At no time during this debate or any other debate over foreign or domestic policy has he sought out any advice from the opposition. In fact, if anything, he views this authoritarian characteristic as a plus rather than a minus. His nature requires that he exercise the most detailed control over any aspect of policy or legislation and expects affirmation from those being subjugated under those policies.

He never admits to a mistake or an error and certainly would never acquiesce on a matter of policy. Look at the takeover of GM and Chrysler. He stood more than 100 years of bankruptcy law on its ear to give a more favorable position to the UAW over the secured creditors of both companies, demonized the secured creditors when they dared to complain, and found absolutely nothing wrong with such action.

His penchant for appointing czars while side-stepping the senate’s clear oversight duty of “advise and consent” speaks to the secretive nature of his administration’s true intentions. While not in direct violation of any law, such appointments in such staggering numbers can only cause one to wonder why he believes these people incapable of surviving a senate hearing.

As to the final characteristics. His progressive credentials cannot be denied. His re-distributionist policies of “social justice” require that all citizens submit, willingly or not, to his “rule” for he knows what is best for us all.

Now, let’s review the characteristics we’ve laid out in the above paragraphs;

- Possesses glibness and a superficial charm
- Has a conventional appearance
- Is contemptuous
- He does not perceive that anything is wrong with himself
- He is manipulative, authoritarian, and secretive
- Possesses a grandiose sense of self, he is narcissistic
- Is incapable of real human attachment to another
- Unable to feel remorse or guilt
- The ultimate goal is the creation of a willing victim
- Goal of enslavement of his/her victim(s)
- Seeks to exercise despotic control over every aspect of a victim’s life
- May state readily that his goal is to rule

The significance of these characteristics may be found here.

In this case, the American People are the victims. So there you have it, gentle reader. Barry Soetero suffers from ASPD. All these above described characteristics are portions of the clinical description. What’s more; no thinking person can deny that these above listed traits are not all parts of our Commander-in-Chief’s makeup. There is no cure, no combination of medications and therapy that can possibly bring this disorder under control. The above traits can only be assigned to one type of personality. Our President, Barack Obama, is a sociopath.