Obama Blinks

With the production of an apparent birth certificate at long last, Obama shows that he can be pushed up against the wall by an opponent willing to play rough. 

As I wrote a couple of weeks ago, I'm not a fan of Donald Trump.  But if there is one thing that his actions of late have proven, it is that he is able to do what no one else has.  He got Barack Obama to produce a document that he has maintained for years that he had already produced.  He was lying, of course.  The certification document might have been sufficient to get a driver's license in Hawaii, but the State Department would never have accepted it for issuing a passport.  What we now have available appears to be the real thing, and as I'm not a big fan of conspiracy theories, I'm not going to take it any farther. 

What is more important in the context of modern politics is that Obama labeled the interest in his birthplace silliness.  He then got on a plane to attend a taping of Oprah and more fund raising.  You tell me which is silliness; demanding that constitutional requirements be met, or appearing on a TV talk show.  Maybe he should have gone off for a round of golf, instead.  In any event, the real silliness was the failure of Mr. Transparency to do his duty three years ago, and his failure to address the nation's problems today.  After all, he is too busy promoting himself.  And critics disparage Donald Trump for self-promotion.    

Meanwhile, Trump has shown his mettle.  He got results, and turned what some folks thought would be a negative it into a positive.  It would have been easy to say "well, I was mistaken" and look contrite when the document turned up. Instead, Trump effectively pointed out that he did what no one else could; not even Hillary Clinton.  It will be interesting to see what his calls for the rest of Obama's records will result in. 

But what was it that made Trump successful?  The correct answer is probably that he was someone that the press couldn't ignore.  They could ignore Joe Farah at World Net Daily and call him a fringe kook if his name ever came up.  Any other "birthers" could be dumped into the same category; not serious journalists, and so on.  The trouble was that the issue was gaining traction.  Polls were reporting that between 25% and 30% of Americans had serious doubts about Obama's citizenship.  The traction was what made the difference.  He had no choice but to cave because another year or so of this would likely have sunk his re-election bid. 

Trump, as this incident shows is a force unto himself.  He has a knack for gaining the public's attention.  He knows how to turn a supposed loss into a win.  He could write The Art of the Deal because he understands business as well as anyone alive today.  He knows the cutthroat world of "take no prisoners" tactics.  Obama is a rank amateur at that game.  He would never have gone anywhere significant in politics if it were not for the fact that the press made him their darling.  He is a light weight, who isn't anywhere as intelligent as his promoters like us to believe.  His supposed thoughtfulness is actually a sign of confusion and indecisiveness.  The idea recently promoted that he is too intelligent to govern is rank folly.  It is an attempt to excuse his incompetence.  After all, no one but a fool thinks that you can borrow your way to prosperity. 

Rush Limbaugh had it right when he said "Barack Obama is a pop icon." He is a media creation; a supposedly transformative politician who has little or know knowledge of anything except his own supposed genius.   On the other hand, If Trump is a pop icon; at least he has a record of success that Obama cannot equal in ten lifetimes.  Trump has built businesses and buildings.  He became a public figure because of his achievements.  Obama, in contrast, doesn't really know how to do anything except read speeches attend parties and play golf or basketball.  The sound bites of him reading a children's book (chicka boom, will there be enough room?) that appeared on Laura Ingraham's morning show recently are a better reflection of his abilities than his university diplomas.  He is to borrow his own wording, the number one side show and carnival barker in the United States today, as evidenced by 1) the fact that he withheld the certificate for years encouraging speculation as to why, and 2) his continual grandstanding instead of attending to business requires one to doubt his commitment to the job he wanted; he just wasn't and isn't serious. 

But back to Trump.  His actions appear to indicate that he considers himself a serious candidate.  We will see what his intentions are when the current television season ends.  His profanity laced speech in Las Vegas shows exactly how un-presidential his personality is, but at the same time he illustrates two important points.  First, regardless of the manner in which he has done so, he has provided the model for the successful Republican candidate; no more Mr. Nice Guy.  Pushing Obama up against the wall and figuratively slapping him a few times will be more successful than John McCain's kid glove approach.  Secondly, and more importantly, Nature abhors a vacuum.  The same is true for the political environment.  Obama refuses to, and to all appearances is incapable of leading, so the public looks for someone who demonstrates the necessary qualities.  The potential Republican candidates are keeping quiet and doing essentially nothing on the national scene.  Chris Christie, who would be a natural for the job is too busy with New Jersey, so someone else has to fill the gap.  Trump is the only one doing so.. 

Picking a presidential candidate by default is not a good idea.  Yet, until someone else shows some spine a large portion of the public will continue to follow the person who does.  If Conservatives are fortunate we will see some new possibilities emerge.  If not, we will have to expect recycled icons of the past who will likely be unsuccessful because they will continue to follow in McCain's footsteps. 

Share

6 comments to Obama Blinks

  • Gestell

    As I’ve said elsewhere on IC today, I think your side has scored a tremendous victory in forcing Obama to release what birthers already regard as an irrelevant document. Now is the time for a judicious mixture of high policy wonkery and down low sleaze. Conservatives might win on economic policy, the deficit, and Obama’s bizarre foreign policy, but you need to keep up the pressure by not letting go of the birther issue. Trump can continue to be useful. He’s imaginative, crude, and energetic,just what your side really needs. There must be at least some whiff of scandal connected with Obama that he could exploit. If you can’t find one, make one up. Look how well you guys have done with the birther issue.

  • Jack

    What does the Birther in Chief hope to accomplish here? Does he think Obama will be impeached and removed from office? Democrats would never allow that, but what if it did happen? Guess who we get for President? JOE BIDEN! Trump might think that he has Obama on the ropes over this, but in my book Trump is a fool. It’s more likely Trump will end up being Obama’s Ross Perot.

  • ruminator

    Osama bin Laden gone – YAY!

  • Bill Wavering

    Consensus here is that Barack Obama is an empty suit. Barack Obama actually consistently earns the title of the least intelligent person in the room and earns such merely by entering said room.

    As I’ve said here before; we could throw darts at a phone book and get a better Commander-in-Chief than we have now. Everyone so far, has downplayed Trump’s qualifications and his methods. I’ll grant you, grandstanding is grandstanding, but all of us have used ‘colorful’ language. We cringe when politicians are shown to be as ‘real’ as we are when they are caught by inadvertently open mikes using salty tongue.

    I find it rather refreshing. There isn’t a one of us that’s not hoped that a president would tell the Chinese, the Arabs, or his political opponents to ‘get bent’!

    We constantly exchange posts here at IC wondering when our elected officials will beginning applying market principles to government; i.e. companies fail (no bailouts) people fail (limit entitlements to the shiftless) and no other country on the planet has our best interest at heart (the Chinese, the Middle East, the EU, Central America, Mexico, take your pick).

    In the past, we’ve had presidents that were former governors, senators, congressmen, and generals. I cannot recall when the last time was (if there ever was) a president that was a businessman. I could personally get behind a president that was willing to look the Chinese in the eye and say; “If you don’t stop playing currency games, I’ll price your imports so high and drop corporate taxes so low that jobs will come flocking back to our shores.” I would like to hear a president say; “We’ll open government lands to oil and gas exploration so American companies can give jobs to American citizens. Attention OPEC the new price of a barrel of oil is a loaf of bread. Don’t like it; eat sand.”

  • Gestell

    Re: Jack’s comment.
    I’ve never been able to figure out why conservatives in Congress do not move forward to impeach Obama. Such a move would focus attention on the conservative agenda and help to rally conservatives around the country. And it would be an action that fits what conservatives believe to be true about Obama. Every day conservatives attack him as a tyrant, a destroyer of his country, an enemy of everything Americans hold dear. He is characterized by labels hitherto usually applied to Hitler or the leaders of the Soviet Union. So why not be consistent? Get the impeachment process going, publicize your views even more, and see if you can remove him from office? Bill will say that the election of 2012 will do this, but conservative crisis rhetoric is such that it’s clear he should go sooner.

    So, what are you guys waiting for? The Rapture?

  • Bill Wavering

    Professor,

    In a word; impeachment is useless. The reason is that with 57 kool-aide drinking liberals in the Senate it couldn’t happen. Although I can understand why you would favor such a move as then he may gain a ‘sympathy’ vote.

    Personally; I’d much rather see Obama attempt to defend his record on domestic and foreign policy all through the 2012 season. $4 gas, 9% unemployment, trillions in deficit spending, one-size fits all health care, asking Israel to return to the indefensible 1967 borders. I intend to relish the upcoming debates where the Messiah spends all of his time repeating; “It’s all Bush’s fault.” over and over and over and over again. Even you yourself have admitted that he makes it awful hard to be a democrat. I not only want to see him try to defend his hubristic, infantile, simple-minded agenda but I want you to watch him do it as well.

Leave a Reply

IC Writers

Articles Archived by Topic