It is a far cry from what our founders envisioned and government meant to protect the rights of citizens. Today we indeed instead have governments, big and small, that control our lives so much that any interruption in government interrupts our lives.
No, I do not ask the question without knowing the answer. Government is too big when the lack of government actually prevents people from living their lives. Our founding fathers wanted government to be there to protect people from encroachments to their lives, liberties and pursuits of happiness. When government instead turns from protector of these rights to an arbiter of how we must go about enjoying them is when things go all wonky.
Case and point; The Ugly Mug. This establishment is a bar in Minnesota near the Twin's baseball stadium. But it has a problem. What problem you ask? Well, The Ugly Mug is running out of beer.
Why is it running out of beer? Does it not have the money to purchase beer? Is there no beer to be purchased? Not quite. The Ugly Mug is running out of beer because the government in Minnesota is shut down. And because the government is shutdown they cannot renew their state liquor purchasing card which the state requires for them to purchase beer.
Now with the government at an impasse over spending and budgets since July 1st, the business is unable to continue with its business. Although recent reports as of this article are that Gov. Mark Dayton is finally backing away from his hardcore stance of demanding more liberalism and progress is finally being made. Hallelujah! Guess without booze even liberals were able to see clearly.
Pretty screwed up right? But this is unfortunately not all that uncommon from sea to shining sea here in America. From coast to coast governments and across the fruited plains from the federal monstrosity in Washington on down there are so many onerous regulations that the lack of government actually prohibits people from living their daily lives.
It is a far cry from what our founders envisioned and government meant to protect the rights of citizens. Today we indeed instead have governments, big and small, that control our lives so much that any interruption in government interrupts our lives.
Seriously, is there any legitimate reason why a bar cannot buy alcohol just because the government has decided to take a hiatus while liberals throw a little temper tantrum over not being allowed to spend money they do not have? Not really. That is, unless you are a bureaucrat trying to justify your meaningless life as a government employee and siphoning off a publicly funded salary because you have no skills to offer the private sector.
Its not just bars like The Ugly Mug that suffer from government's intrusion into realms it never belonged in the first place. Every time a government somewhere shuts down we hear stories that just make you have to wonder. The most common seems to be about travelers arriving at public parks for long planned vacations only to be turned away by a park ranger who no one ever recalled seeing ever before and shuttered gates.
Really? It's a park for crying out loud! It is a bunch of trees and grassy fields and dirt trails with the occasional woodland creature dropping piles excreta. But when the government bureaucrats decide it is time to remind the people who is really in charge what happens? These places get boarded up and put off limits, that's what.
Oh sure, there are hackneyed excuses as to why this is from public safety and the lack of park officials to watch over folks to the claim that no one is around to clean up and prepare campsites for visitors. But really, these are all just lame attempts to put a spin on why the public is being inconvenienced by government babies not getting their way.
Government should not be an impediment to people pursuing their happiness. And by the same token lack of government should not prohibit businesses from doing business. That is how we arrive at the simple concept of limited government. It is what is best for all.
But government has gone well beyond those bounds. And government would not have it any other way.
J.J. Jackson is right on target with this essay. Look at the Prevaricator-in-Chief’s answer to a CBS Anchor’s question on July 12th. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/07/12/obama-social-security-checks-debt-ceiling_n_895831.html He not only threatened the checks of seasoned citizens, but the checks of military men and women as well. Conspicuous by absence were welfare checks, unemployment checks, and ethanol subsidy payments.
President Obama is no better than a small-town precinct captain that threatens to lay off police and firefighters if the public fails to vote for a tax increase. He’ll threaten the people he cares for least, seniors and military personnel. However you can bet your savings, or what’s left of it, that those checks to his homeys in the hood will go out on time.
This administration has steadfastly refused to place ANY plan for specific immediate spending cuts on the table while demanding that their political opponents detail the taxes that will be raised in order to enhance revenue.
Like Wimpy in the old Popeye the Sailor cartoons; they will gladly promise ephemeral cuts in the out years; cuts that, by the way, have a nasty habit of never happening, for immediate revenue enhancement and a blank check for another $2.4 trillion in debt today.
The major reason the Barack Obama wants a ‘large’ deal is that he plans on spending every penny of the new debt limit on ‘investment’ projects for public and corporate union buddies to get re-elected. He needs this ‘spreadin’ around’ money over and above his own campaign war chest; because of his dismal performance, so far, in office.