She-Devil and Straw Woman
by Gary Larson
19 March 2004
that matters, of course, is the "charge." Enough, you see, for
today's liberal media to sanctify with fake credibility.
of the far left, Ann Coulter dares to criticize ex-Senator Max Cleland’s
record. Contrary to slurs from liberal critics, she’s ‘questioning' no one’s
A curious mix of hate and hubris marks liberal critics’ take on Ann Coulter’s
column last month on the record of ex-Senator Max Cleland (D-GA). In knee-jerk
fashion (reflexive, you say?) some over-the-top liberals resort to an insidious
form of political warfare. They berate Coulter for “questioning” Vietnam
war hero Cleland’s patriotism. It’s a bogus charge.
Go line by line in her syndicated February column, “Cleland drops a political grenade.”
Nary a peep about anyone’s lack of patriotism. "No one ever challenged
Cleland’s patriotism,” Coulter preemptively wrote, likely foreseeing a “charge”
to come from the bash-happy left.
A few Democrats say their patriotism today is held suspect. It's a surreal
claim, more anticipatory than based on reality. Why make such a peculiar
claim? To distract from duplicitous records in the war on terrorism? To ward
off barbs about being called soft on Al-Qaeda?
In brief, here's the scheme: (1) Conjure up a phony charge. (2) Tie
it to a straw man -- in this case, a straw woman. (3) Scream bloody murder
against the “charge” you made up for the voodoo doll you created. Presto!
Ann Coulter becomes your She-Devil, object of liberals' hate, bitch goddess
out to malign a good and decent vet’s very honor by “questioning” his patriotism.
Only it’s all bunk.
To hear media pump it up, you’d think truth itself was thundering down the
mountain. They pounce on every red herring and lavish attention on every
spurious “charge.” Ergo, public attention is drawn from the Real Issues.
Indeed, that might be The Plan.
Always a lighting rod for the left’s brutish hostility, Coulter is smeared
as a straw woman. Media buy into gratuitous slurs. “Charges” are recycled
in hateful letters. One gets the impression that the “liberal” classes,
from young apoplectic party wonks to their pandering media allies, just can’t
handle simple truths. So they make up their own faux realities.
Do anything, say anything to win. Facts are immaterial. Falsely-premised
charges do nicely. Campaign strategists call the cheap shots, counting on
fawning media to recycle them. Howard Dean sums up this Machiavellian
strategy in his exit speech: “Whatever it takes…to beat Bush.” Whatever? Such as lying? Creating straw persons? Yeeaaaah!
Win-at-all-cost politicos do not endure truth-telling. It rips their
pipe dreams of the way things ought to be, and would be, if only they had
the power. Of course this trait is NOT exclusive to the political left,
which only has the resources -- read, liberal media support -- to recycle
red herrings and foist silly charges on the electorate.
The fervent left has honed their tactics to near demagogic perfection. Remember
Ken Starr as Inquisitor Torquemada? Robert Bork as “Strict Constructionist?"
Newt Gingrich as, well, as himself? Subject of gross misrepresentations,
of lies endlessly repeated, they were imbued by passionate liberals and media
with detestable values they’d never recognize, let alone espouse. Coulter
joins the august group of the put-upon-falsely-by-the-loony-left.
Likely she relishes her status in the pantheon of the hate-fest celebrities.
After all, it validates a few of her views of the left’s wretched excesses.
Straw person tactics go beyond spinning a message. They alter the message.
Straw persons are made for bashing. After unleashing their straw-made creatures,
the political Dr. Frankensteins snarl at vile “charges” they’ve created for
them. Hypocritical? Sure. Why, even mature liberals decry such
deceits when pressed to declare plain honesty.
Democrats’ Party Boss Terry McAuliffe recites a canard that Cleland was “thrown
out of office” by voters of Georgia “because Republicans called him unpatriotic.”
That’s hooey. A sham allegation, it demeans a majority of Georgia voters.
No matter. All that matters, of course, is the "charge."
Enough, you see, for today's liberal media to sanctify with fake credibility.
Cleland does nothing to disabuse the public of the “unpatriotic” notion.
Instead he dutifully picks up the Party line. On the campaign trail,
John Kerry and Cleland now adopt, for the political stage, the Big Lie they
know to be one -- i.e., that their patriotism is “questioned.” That’s scripted
stuff of DNC talking points made for media-peddling and for the otherwise
gullible. (Again, P.T. Barnum got it largely right. How terrifying is that?)
A signed commentary in the editorially leftist Minneapolis (MN) Star Tribune
illustrates the straw person gambit. [“For ‘gutter politics,’ look
to the Bush camp,” by Deputy Editor Jim Boyd, Feb. 20, 2004.] Boyd bashes
Coulter’s column without even a nod to the truth, buying the lie about "questioning"
Cleland’s patriotism. Okay, so he’s 100% biased.
Piling on, Boyd insists “blond guided missile” Coulter was “unleashed” by
“Republicans” (VRWC?) to discredit Cleland. Surely he jests. Nope. The daffy
deputy editor is quite serious about moving that Party line. He fails
to see Ann Coulter as her own woman -- strong, conservative, the very worst
kind of all? -- reporting to no one but herself.
So what’s Boyd’s beef? Likely this, from her column: “He [Cleland]
should stop allowing Democrats to portray him as a war hero who lost his
limbs taking enemy fire on the battlefield of Vietnam.” The turn of phrase
“on the battlefield” gets daft left-liberals such as Boyd all lathered up,
their undies tied up in bundles. Off they go, half-cocked, wildly hip-shooting,
losing all perspective.
(For the record: Cleland’s injury was not the result of enemy fire, but a
horrendous accident. He picked up a loose, live hand grenade in a staging
area in Vietnam. He barely escaped with his life while becoming a triple
amputee for his unquestioned heroism.)
Says Coulter: “Voters in Georgia may have given [Cleland] a pass to Congress
as a Vietnam veteran, but he didn’t get a lifetime pass.” Touché! Cleland’s record, no lack of patriotism, separated him from another term as a lifetime U.S. Senator, she suggests.
Boyd labels Coulter “a political operative.” But she’s a mere columnist,
a pundit. (Shoe-on-the-other-foot dept.: Is smug, snippy Maureen Dowd a covert
political operative? Does Michael Moore speak for all Democrats?)
Come on. Let's get real. Coulter is no “shill” for “for the Bush
White House.” Or part of a conspiracy. How paranoid can the ultraliberal
Editor Boyd’s biggest laugh line is possibly unintentional, and quite ironic: “Democrats are capable of some [sic!] of this, too.” Oh, really? Who would have guessed it?
Here's one example: Look only to Boyd himself equating President Bush’s
war policies to those of the most reviled man in history, Adolph Hitler.
In a 2002 column, Boyd quite agrees with a German cabinet minister’s remark
laying on the Nazi line on the U.S. president. How’s that for dirty
God-awful punditry? Can’t get more gutter-style “capable” than this lowest
of all blows from the wild-eyed left.
Political foul play is what far left-liberals say, at least, they abhor.
(Gosh, so they're both hypocritical and malicious?) Myopic individuals,
many on the hard left don’t “get it,” likely never to join their responsible
liberal colleagues seeing flaws in false premises. Seeing motes in
others’ eyes, they see no beams in their own. Call it a political blind
spot, often inbred, more likely the result of their collegiate indoctrinations.
Oh well. That's life in biased times.
Making straw persons to malign is a phenomenon conservatives and libertarians
now come to expect -- not only in adversaries’ Party organs, but also in
“mainstream” media. The two morph into a truth-defying, single-minded
voice, akin to the prosaic output of Oceania’s Ministry of Truth, in
Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four. Our hero Winston Smith wailed:
“Until they [proles] become conscious they will never rebel…” against the
Party line. Or question it. ‘Tis a pity, such intellectual myopia.
Larson is a retired association CEO and former business magazine editor residing
in Minnesota. He is not the cartoonist of the same name. Larson
is a graduate of the University of Minnesota’s School of Journalism and Mass
Email Gary Larson
this Article to a Friend