UN Wants Control of the Seas with US Senate’s Help
by Tom DeWeese
29 March 2004
The Law of the Sea Treaty has again reared its ugly head and now stands
on the verge of passage in the Senate under the forceful hand of Republican
Senator Richard Lugar.
Soon after taking
office in January 1981, President Ronald Reagan and several of his key advisors
were working through a mound of policy matters that had spilled over from
the Carter Administration. One of those issues concerned the signing of the
United Nation’s new Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST).
As the advisors talked among themselves debating whether the administration
should sign the treaty as it stood or demand changes, the President sat by
silently and listened. With the debate raging, suddenly the President’s voice
was heard to say, “Isn’t that what it was all about?”
Debate stopped as everyone looked over to the President. “What, sir?” Reagan
then repeated his statement. “Isn’t that what it was all about – the election?
Doesn’t it mean that we don’t have to sign these things?”
The group realized that President Reagan had just cut through all of the
debate and stated the real issue. His administration had been elected to
defend American sovereignty and independence, and that changes in a bad treaty
didn’t have to be negotiated. He could just refuse to sign and kill it right
then and there. Ronald Reagan understood that he was the President of the
United States and not a captive of someone else’s power grab.
And the Law of the Sea Treaty remained justifiably dead for the next 12 years
until Bill Clinton pulled it out of the trash bin, dusted it off and signed
it. Then, in the spirit of Reagan, a courageous Senator Jesse Helms, chairman
of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, bottled it up until the Clintonistas
were driven from power.
But today there is no Ronald Reagan and no Jesse Helms, and so the Law of
the Sea Treaty has again reared its ugly head and now stands on the verge
of passage in the Senate under the forceful hand of Republican Senator Richard
Lugar, the current Chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee. Worse, Lugar
is aided in his quest by a hapless Bush Administration.
After unanimously passing the Treaty out of committee, the pressure is on
to give it “unanimous consent,” meaning there will be no official vote to
ratify the treaty; no record of support or opposition; no one to blame when
it’s over. The treaty will just become the law of the land – no muss, no
fuss. Business as usual. Senators like to hide from the people that way.
It makes life so much easier for them.
For the record, here are just a few of the reasons why Ronald Reagan, Jesse
Helms and those loyal to the American ideal believe the United States should
never be a party to the Law of the Sea Treaty.
Freedom of the seas has been the guiding principle recognized by sovereign
nations since ancient times. It means all nations recognize that ships, government
owned or private, are free to sail the seas wherever they like, carrying
their cargoes to ports of call for free trade among nations. Freedom of the
seas also means the right to mine and fish the resources of the seas, unhindered.
Nations have traditionally claimed a slim line along their coasts as sovereign
territory for protection of national interests and defense. Three miles out
from shore has been the traditional limit recognized by nations. That distance
used to represent the range of a cannon on shore. Any waters outside such
limited claims have been understood to be free of control. The rights of
individuals and private companies to use the seas for pleasure and commerce
has been unquestioned.
That’s all about to change. In the name of “social equity,” a euphemism for
“redistribution of the wealth,” the UN’s Law of the Sea Treaty will replace
the freedom of the seas concept with central control from an international
body, specifically the United Nations. Under UN control a new supranational
agency has been created called the Seabed Authority.
The Seabed Authority is organized identically to the UN General Assembly
using the one nation, one vote model. That means that numerous, tiny Third
World nations can organize a block of votes hostile to the United States
and other industrial nations. Such a setup has created an unworkable situation
in the General Assembly and it’s why that body achieves very little of worthwhile
substance. Now, the same gridlock expects to rule the seas of the world.
The Seabed Authority will have the power to regulate all the seas – roughly
seven-tenths of the world’s surface area. It will have the sole power to
issue permits for fishing and mining and drilling operations under the surface.
It can fix prices of sea products and impose quotas on how much is produced.
It can levy international taxes and impose production quotas on deep-sea
mining and oil production; control ocean research and exploration; and create
a multinational court to enforce its dictates. Don’t be surprised to see
Seabed Authority ships plying the waters, stalking ships, and mining and
drilling operations it deems in violation of its authority.
The Seabed Authority can force governments and private companies to file
for permits and impose fees and it can delay production for years. Yet, in
the end, after charging up to a million dollars for permit fees, there is
nothing in the Treaty that requires the Authority to EVER issue even a single
permit. In addition, the provisions establishing the Authority gives it the
power to set up its own mining and drilling activities, and compete right
next to private efforts. That provision alone should set off alarm bells
concerning the fairness of permit decisions.
The revenues raised by the Seabed Authority make it a powerful force that
will likely be controlled by the Third World block. This new wealth and power
may lead to the establishment of a cartel of sorts where the Third World
nations could control all assets of the seas for their own interests, leaving
developed nations at their mercy.
Under the Law of the Sea Treaty, U.S. national defense interests would be
dangerously threatened as several provisions of the treaty would prevent
inspection or boarding of suspected terrorist ships. When the U.S. invaded
Afghanistan after the 9-11 terrorist attacks, several ships controlled by
al Qaeda were seen fleeing the area and were chased down and boarded by U.S.
war ships. Equipment, weapons and the terrorists who owned them were apprehended.
Yet the treaty offers still more of a threat to our national interests. It
demands that nations share information with all others concerning sea exploration.
This provision constitutes a mandatory technology transfer and can include
military secrets such as submarine detection techniques.
The most dangerous aspect of the treaty has nothing to do with the seas,
however. Rather, the danger lies with the United Nations gaining the authority
to impose taxes through the Seabed Authority. The UN is basically a club.
It has private members who pay voluntary dues. Only governments have the
power to tax, operate a court system or field armies. If the UN gains the
power to tax through the Law of the Sea Treaty, the cat is out of the bag.
There can then be no stopping any of hundreds of taxing schemes now floating
around the UN. The UN has already established its own criminal court. Given
the ability to tax, it will be two thirds on the way to becoming the global
government of its dreams.
The Law of the Sea Treaty is clearly a massive threat to the sovereignty
and independence of the United States and our private companies operating
internationally. Is it any wonder why Senator Lugar is putting pressure on
Senate Majority Leader Frist to push the treaty through without debate and
without a recorded vote. He wants none of these facts to get a public airing.
The treaty has been reborn because a massive lobbying effort has been waged
by those who seek UN global governance. Environmental groups stand to gain
incredible power to block oil drilling and mining. International corporations
think it will be easier to deal with one central power than with multiple
foreign countries. Several oil and mineral companies think they can use the
treaty to gain their own form of power and cut their competition. They play
to get theirs at the expense of everyone else. It’s an old game played on
Capitol Hill. All of them will find in the end that they’ve played a costly
The fight over the Law of the Sea Treaty is really an ancient one between
those who believe in the concepts of private property and free markets and
those who can’t conceive of anything not being controlled by government.
The seas have been free for the entire history of mankind, except when controlled
by a dictator. We’ve fought pirates and Hitler to keep them open. Why would
we now surrender that freedom to mindless, faceless bureaucrats who covet
power and care nothing for our rights?
The actions of Senator Lugar and his cohorts defy comprehension by reasonable
Americans. Yet so far, Americans have remained silent while the Law of the
Sea Treaty is being slipped through to stealth ratification. Our senators
are sending the message that they don’t need you in the process. They don’t
feel the need to hear from you. Instead, they want to cater to the wants
of a powerful lobby.
Will we let them get away with it? Will we see this massive piece of our
liberty drown in the seas while we do nothing – again? A massive outcry of
NO now will stop it. It just requires one phone call to your United States
Senator. Here’s the number: 202-224-3121. Call it and stop the Law of the
Sea Treaty and keep the seas of the world open and free – as they’ve always
Tom DeWeese is publisher and editor of The DeWeese Report and president of the American Policy Center, a grassroots, activist think tank headquartered in Warrenton, VA.
Email Tom DeWeese
this Article to a Friend