|
|
|
|
Iran's Growing Nuclear Threat
by Joe Mariani
15 June 2004
After
months of playing hide-and-seek with the International Atomic Energy Agency,
Iran has taken a hard-line stance against any restrictions on its nuclear
program.
|
|
For years, the Iranian
government has been playing games with the world about its nuclear program,
claiming it was only interested in peaceful nuclear development. That lie
is about to be disproved in the most terrible way possible -- by the emergence
of Iran as a nuclear power.
For reference, ordinary natural uranium has an atomic weight of 238. Only
.72 percent of naturally-occurring uranium consists of an unstable isotope
with a weight of 235. Various complex methods can be used to separate the
lighter uranium from the mix; the most common is by gas centrifuge, of the
sort that was found buried under a rosebush in Iraq. Highly-enriched uranium
(HEU) contains more than 20 percent Uranium-235. Weapons-grade HEU consists
of more than 90 percent pure U-235. A power-generating reactor can be fueled
with lower grades of uranium; there is no need for HEU unless you want a
sustained nuclear fission reaction -- in other words, a nuclear bomb.
After months of playing hide-and-seek with the International Atomic Energy
Agency, Iran has taken a hard-line stance against any restrictions on its
nuclear program. Foreign Minister Kamal Kharrazi said, "Iran has a high technical
capability and has to be recognized by the international community as a member
of the nuclear club. This is an irreversible path." The "nuclear club" consists
of those countries that admit to having nuclear weapons -- the US, the UK,
France, Russia, China, and most recently Pakistan and India. North Korea
claims to have working nuclear weapons, but has not yet openly tested one,
and Israel is suspected of having them. Libya was close to achieving nuclear
capability, but Moammar Ghaddafi wisely gave up his ambitions in that direction
after the US-led coalition removed Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq in March
2003. Though Iran claimed to have halted its uranium enrichment program,
inspectors from the IAEA have repeatedly found traces of highly-enriched
uranium at multiple sites in Iran.
Iran has been caught in lies regarding its nuclear weapons programs before,
and has covered up very badly. When IAEA inspectors tried in May 2004 to
visit suspicious sites they had seen only months earlier, they found that
the sites themselves had vanished. The buildings that the inspectors believed
contained working enrichment facilities were gone, and in their place were
freshly-planted flowerbeds. The Iranians pretended that no buildings had
ever been there, even when shown aerial and satellite photographs of the
missing buildings. Now, they refuse to keep up even a weak pretense. What
else could it mean but the imminence of their nuclear ambition being fulfilled?
A radical fundamentalist government which sponsors global terrorism gaining
nuclear capability is a horror that cannot be allowed to happen. If terrorists
are willing to blow themselves up in cars packed with explosives or strap
on "bomb belts" in order to kill innocent civilians in restaurants and buses,
why would they balk at using nuclear weapons in the same way? If they believe
they will be rewarded in the afterlife for killing a few children on a schoolbus,
what reward do they think they'll receive for wiping an entire city off the
map? It's no longer a matter of if, but when. If we allow Tehran to create
nuclear weapons, how long will it be before we wake up to find that a nuclear
bomb has destroyed a major city like Tel Aviv, Baghdad, Paris, New York,
London or Washington DC? Every place on Earth that terrorists have struck,
they would have attacked with nuclear weapons if it had been possible. Next
time, it might be.
What can be done to stop this threat? If we think we have the time
-- and that depends entirely on our intelligence services, which have not
exactly had a good track record in the Middle East -- we can attempt to impose
sanctions. Most of Iran's oil exports are shipped through the Straits of
Hormuz, which can be blockaded with just a small percentage of America's
naval force. With the bulk of its oil income halted, the Iranian economy
would collapse, but not overnight. Will we have the determination to keep
up the blockade long enough? Other oil-exporting nations would undoubtedly
halt their exports to any participating nations, and gas and oil prices would
rise higher than ever before. (One has to wonder whether this is why President
Bush refuses to release oil from the nation's emergency reserve.) The only
other option is to strike Iran's suspected nuclear facilities before they
can enrich enough uranium to build a weapon, although knowing their locations
depends on our intelligence services as well.
The only certainty either way is that the "mainstream" media, Democrats and
Liberals would vilify President Bush even more than they already do, if that's
even possible. One really has to wonder whose side they're on. Of course,
they wouldn't be too kind to him if whole cities began to disappear, either.
Joe
Mariani was born and raised in New Jersey. He lives in Pennsylvania, where
the gun laws are less restrictive and taxes are lower. His essays and
links to articles are available at http://guardian.blogdrive.com.
Email Joe Mariani
Send
this Article to a Friend
|
|