|
|
|
|
Dems Call Off the Dogs
by Lisa Fabrizio
27 July 2004
You have to give Kerry’s handlers credit for toning done the hateful rhetoric
and putting a happy face on their showcase.
|
|
So the first day
of the Democratic convention is in the can, but what to make of it? The show
opened with Terry McAuliffe wielding a gavel and trying to look legitimate
in front of an embarrassingly empty hall and one almost got the sense that
in between speakers he was outside dragging people to the floor.
After watching the opening afternoon’s slate it was easy to see why so many
delegates avoided the main hall. Speaker after speaker either bordered on
the somnambulant or shouted as if they needed to be heard over the dozens
in the audience -- the echoes were deafening.
One highlight of the early opening session had to be McAuliffe’s hilarious attempt at introducing Bill Richardson en Espanol.
Another was the queasy feeling one got while watching various and sundry
sons and daughters of ‘sharecroppers’ preaching class warfare while simultaneously
shilling for two rich white men.
As for the evening’s featured luminaries, it is interesting to recall that
John Kerry was not their first choice. Both Al Gore and Jimmy Carter supported
Howard Dean while the Clintons gave tacit support to Wesley Clark.
At the podium, perpetual victim Gore was quick to launch an attempt at self-deprecation
in addressing his 2000 defeat, an event more easily understood when witnessing
his oratory stylings. Later on, President Carter demonstrated once again
why the term ‘misery index’ will be eternally associated with his name.
Bill and Hill performed as one would expect, which is to say that she played
the bride while he outright lied. Still, he is the megastar of the party,
and the looks of worship on the conventioneers’ faces and the palatable heartbreak
that the 22nd Amendment forbids his return to the White House suggest that
the highlight of the convention has passed.
Scattered around the night’s speeches were filmed, feel-good testimonials,
endorsements from ‘regular’ Americans around the country and some really
bad dancing on the Fleet Center floor. Also included was a depressing “Remembrance
of 9/11” which oddly omitted any reference to the perpetrators of that attack.
The only notable mention of homeland security was Bill’s support of Kerry’s
plan to defend against future attacks by increasing funding for ‘first responders.’
The left doesn’t believe in pre-emptive strikes but they’ll sure be ready
when it comes to treating the wounded. Democrats apparently feel that the
best offense is a good defense.
Most of the talking-points expressed to this point generate more questions
than answers. Many of the participants railed at the evils of job outsourcing.
Why not challenge Teresa Heinz Kerry, whose company has 57 foreign plants?
Why not ask which party supports the three things that force companies to
flee overseas: high taxes, suffocating regulation and excessive union demands?
Others complained about our dependence on foreign oil and high healthcare
costs. Again, which party refuses to allow domestic and offshore drilling?
Which supports such severe standards on our own oil that we cannot use it
and must sell it to other countries? Which is it that opposes medical tort
reform that would reduce malpractice suits, and counts trial lawyers among
its biggest donors?
Probably the most popular rant was that President Bush has alienated our
allies and launched a ‘unilateral,’ pre-emptive war. Why don’t Democrats
understand the meaning of the word unilateral? Why are they insulting the
many countries who have stood strong with us? Do they not remember the fourteen
months the President spent pleading his case before the U.N., after which
that worthless body refused to act on the “serious consequences” it threatened
in the unanimously passed Resolution 1441?
Most puzzling, though, is the notion that the president of the United States
of America should somehow be ready, willing and able to unite and rule ‘the
world.’ Which poll shows that our enemies’ view of America is of even miniscule
importance to voters? What makes the left think that Joe Six-pack gives a
damn about old Europe’s opinion of us? And why on Earth would Democrats suppose
that we Yanks feel that the ability to speak French is an asset?
Still, you have to give Kerry’s handlers credit for toning done the hateful
rhetoric and putting a happy face on their showcase, even though it is a
tad disappointing. But after seven straight hours of watching the donkeys
struggle to call off the dogs, my last question is: When does Dennis Kucinich
go on?
Lisa Fabrizio is a freelance columnist from Stamford, Connecticut.
Email Lisa Fabrizio
Send
this Article to a Friend
|
|