|
|
|
|
Sunset in Dowdland
by Isaiah Z. Sterrett
12 August 2004
If something can be gleaned from Bushworld: Enter At Your Own Risk, it’s that Dowd doesn’t have great affection for George W. Bush.
|
|
The funniest part of Maureen Dowd’s new book
is how funny it is. Generally one can count on a political book to
make some sort of point, to contain some kind of a theme, or to at least
document newfound evidence to support one’s views. But Dowd has managed
to form a 523-page book about nothing. She uses words like a bee uses
its stinger, but she makes no honey.
If something can be gleaned from Bushworld: Enter At Your Own Risk,
it’s that Dowd doesn’t have great affection for George W. Bush. At
least that’s what she claims. Using all the weary clichés of Democratic
blab-points, she contends that Bush has been a rotten president. “In
Bushworld,” she writes, “our troops go to war and get killed, but you never
see the bodies coming home.”
In spite of her tough talk, she appears to have a near fixation on the Bushes.
During the presidency of “41,” as she insists on calling George H.W. Bush,
she seems to have always been courting the President’s attention. One
day, she recounts, she was in Kennebunkport watching him and his son, the
future President Bush, play golf. Anxious to be noticed, she put on
a “Bob Dole for President in ’88” T-shirt and a “Jesse Jackson for President
in ‘88” hat. “I knew 41 would get the joke,” she writes. But
then, anticlimactically, “Poppy wasn’t looking and Junior gave me a scary
glare.” She was genuinely disappointed.
Occasionally Dowd does buckle-down to make an original point. But instead
of making it with data, she writes a couple of sentences, and then immediately
presses onward. To Dowd, no argument warrants more than a few dozen
syllables. And given that her book is sprinkled with words like “dauphin,”
I don’t think her terseness is based on a petit vocabulaire. She’s overly succinct because she’s unduly prepared to debate.
In a terribly condescending column about Dick Cheney, she writes that the
former Wyoming legislator “voted to the right of the NRA…” It would
be easy to read that phrase and move on, just as Dowd hopes you will.
But adding just an ounce of thought to even a dash of Dowd is always recommended.
The specific purpose of the National Rifle Association is to defend the Second
Amendment of the Constitution, through which Americans have a right “to keep
and bear arms.” Without the Second Amendment there would be no NRA.
So to say that Cheney voted “to the right of the NRA” is to say that he “voted
to the right of” the Constitution. And if she pointedly writes that
one can vote “to the right of” the Constitution, the Constitution must be
a right-leaning document. If Dowd didn’t think so, her comparison wouldn’t
make sense.
So if Dowd thinks the Constitution is conservative, and if she believes,
as everyone does, that the Constitution is the blueprint of American democracy,
she must believe that her ideology -- brazen liberalism -- goes against the
very basis of American thought.
She didn’t mention any of that. To do so would have been far too difficult.
Rather than careful thought, her writing is based largely on a bizarre fantasy
fueled by her personal love of Shakespearean drama. In an interview
with C-SPAN’s Booknotes, she said that she’d always been a bit glum
that she’d had to cover George H.W., instead of someone more mysterious like
Nixon. W., by contrast, has provided her with exactly the kind of dark
intrigue she’s always longed for.
She has worked so hard to drench herself in the muck of metaphor that she’s
forgotten to write about peace and war, freedom and terrorism, life and death.
She’d rather scribble tight similes than thoughtful opinions. I like
a good allegory as much as any Pulitzer-winner, but I’ve also taken quite
a liking to America. And sometimes, like when we’re at war because
Muslim extremists are trying to kill us, ideas are more important than poetry.
For Dowd, it’s not about the politics or the issues or the country. It’s about the fantasies of an op-ed columnist.
“All right, Mr. Sulzberger,” you can almost hear her whisper as she struts
toward Times Square, magenta hair dancing in the thick Manhattan air.
“I’m ready for my close-up.”
Isaiah
Z. Sterrett, a resident of Aptos, California, is a Lifetime Member of the
California Junior Scholarship Federation and a Sustaining Member of the Republican
National Committee.
Email Isaiah Sterrett
Send
this Article to a Friend
|
|